Muscles of the pes of hylid frogs

Journal of Morphology

Volumn 260, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 209-233

  Burton, Thomas C ^a  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Anura; Hylidae; Myology; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FROG; HINDLIMB; HISTOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; SKELETAL MUSCLE;

ANIMALS; HINDLIMB; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PHYLOGENY; RANIDAE;

ALLOPHRYNE; ANURA; CENTROLENIDAE; HYLA; HYLIDAE; HYLOIDEA;

EID: 2542453788     PISSN: 03622525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10204     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Andersen ML. 1978. The comparative myology and osteology of the carpus and tarsus of selected anurans. PhD dissertation. Lawrence: University of Kansas.
2. Austin JD, Lougheed SC, Tanner K, Chek AA, Bogart JP, Boag PT. 2002. A molecular perspective on the evolutionary affinities of an enigmatic neotropical frog Allophryne ruthveni. Zool J Linn Soc 134:335-346
3. Bigalke R. 1926. Myologie der Erdkröte. Zeitsch ges Anat 82:286-353.
4. Bremer K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42:795-803.
5. Bremer K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10:295-304.
6. Bock WJ, Shear CR. 1972. A staining method for gross dissection of vertebrate muscles. Anat Anz 130:222-227.
7. Burton TC. 1986. A reassessment of the Papuan subfamily Asterophryinae (Anura: Microhylidae). Rec S Aust Mus 19:405-450.
8. Burton TC. 1996. Adaptation and phylogeny in the hand muscles of Australo-Papuan hylid frogs (Anura: Hylidae: Pelodryadinae). Aust J Zool 44:611-623.
9. Burton TC. 1998a. Variation in the hand and superficial throat musculature of neotropical leptodactylid frogs. Herpetologica 54:53-72.
10. Burton TC. 1998b. Are the distal extensor muscles of the fingers of frogs adaptations to arboreality? J Herpetol 32:611-617.
11. Burton TC. 1998c. Pointing the way: the distribution and evolution of some characters of the finger muscles of frogs. Am Mus Novitat 3229:1-13.
12. Burton TC. 2001. Variation in the foot muscles of frogs of the family Myobatrachidae. Aust J Zool 49:1-21.
13. da Silva HR. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships of the family Hylidae with emphasis on the relationships within the subfamily Hylinae (Amphibia: Anura). PhD dissertation. Lawrence: University of Kansas.
14. Duellman WE. 1970. Hylid frogs of Middle America. Monogr Mus Nat Hist Univ Kansas 1-2:1-753.
15. Duellman WE. 2001. Hylid frogs of Middle America, 2nd ed. Ithaca, NY: Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles.
16. Dunlap DG. 1960. The comparative myology of the pelvic appendage in the Salientia. J Morphol 106:1-76.
17. Egan D. 1995. The comparative osteology and myology of the carpus of the Australian Leptodactylidae. Honours dissertation. Department of Zoology: University of Adelaide.
18. Fabrezi M. 1992. El carpo de los anuros. Alytes 10:1-29.
19. Fabrezi M, Langone JA. 2000. Los caracteres morphológicos del controvertido Neobatrachia arborícola Allophryne ruthveni Gaige, 1926. Cuadernos Herpetol 14:47-59.
20. Faivovich J. 2002. A cladistic analysis of Scinax (Anura: Hylidae). Cladistics 18:367-393.
21. Frost DR. 2002. Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. Available from http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html
22. Funkhouser A. 1957. A review of the neotropical tree-frogs of the genus Phyllomedusa. Occas Pap Nat Hist Mus Stanford Univ 5:1-90.
23. Gaupp E. 1896. A. Ecker's und R. Wiedersheim's Anatomie des Frosches, 2 vols. Brauschweig: Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn.
24. Goloboff PA. 1999. Analyzing large data sets in reasonable times: solutions for composite optima. Cladistics 15:415-428.
25. Hedges SB. 1996. The origin of the West Indies ampibians and reptiles. In: Powell R, Henderson RW, editors. Contributions to West Indian herpetology: a tribute to Albert Schwartz. Ithaca, NY: Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. p 95-128.
26. Hutchinson MN, Maxson LR. 1987. Phylogenetic relationships among Australian tree frogs (Anura: Hylidae: Pelodryadinae): an immunological approach. Aust J Zool 35:61-74.
27. Laurent RF. 1979. Esquisse d'une phylogenèse des anoures. Bull Soc Zool France 104:397-422.
28. Liem SS. 1970. The morphology, systematics and evolution of the Old World tree frogs (Rhacophoridae and Hyperoliidae). Field Zool 57:1-145.
29. Lynch JD. 1971. Evolutionary relationships, osteology, and zoogeography of leptodactyloid frogs. Mise Publ Mus Nat Hist Univ Kansas 53:1-238.
30. Mendelson JR III, da Silva HR, Maglia AM. 2000. Phylogenetic relations among marsupial frog genera (Anura: Hylidae: Hemiphractinae) based on evidence from morphology and natural history. Zool J Linn Soc 128:125-148.
31. Nixon KC. 1999. The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics 15:407-414.
32. Perrin A. 1892. Contribution a l'etude de la myologie comparee: Membre posterieur chez certain nombre de Batrachiens et de Sauriens. Bull Sci France Belg 24:373-552.
33. Ruvinsky I, Maxson LR. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships among bufonoid frogs (Anura: Neobatrachia) informed by mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol Phyl Evol 5:533-547.
34. Savage JM. 1973. The geographic distribution of frogs: patterns and predictions. In: Vial JL, editor. Evolutionary biology of the amphibians. Columbia: University of Missouri Press. p 351-445.
35. Savage JM. 2002. The hylid frogs of Middle America. Copeia 2002:545-552.
36. Trueb L, Tyler MJ. 1974. Systematics and evolution of the Greater Antillean hylid frogs. Univ Kansas Occas Pap Mus Nat Hist 24:1-60.
37. Tyler MJ, Davies M. 1978. Species-groups within the Australopapuan hylid frog genus Litoria Tschudi. Aust J Zool Suppl Series No. 63.