Reception thresholds for sentences in bilingual (Spanish/English) and monolingual (English) listeners

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 88-98

  von Hapsburg, Deborah ^a   Champlin, Craig A ^b   Shetty, Suparna R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Bilingual; Speech perception; Speech reception threshold

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MULTILINGUALISM; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLD TEST;

EID: 2542453078     PISSN: 10500545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.15.1.9     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bergman, M. (1980). Aging and the Perception of Speech. Baltimore: University Park.
2. Buus S, Florentine M, Scharf B, Canevet G. (1986). Native French listeners' perception of American-English in noise. Proceedings of Inter-Noise '86 895-898.
3. Dornic S. (1980). Information processing and language dominance. Int Rev Appl Psychol 29:119-140.
4. Flege JE. (1999). Age of learning and second language speech. In: Birdsong D, ed. Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 101-131.
5. Grosjean F. (1997). Processing mixed language: Issues, findings, and models. In: De Groot AMB, Kroll JF, eds. Tutorials in Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 225-251.
6. Grosjean F. (1989). Neurolinguists, beware! the bilingual is not two monolinguals in one person. Brain Lang 36:3-15.
7. Grosjean F. (1998). Studying bilinguals: Methodological and conceptual issues. Biling Lang Cogn 1:131-149.
8. Hanks WD, Johnson GD. (1998). HINT list equivalency using older listeners. J Speech Lang Hear Res 41:1335-1340.
9. Hernandez AE, Bates EA, Avila LX. (1994). On-line sentence interpretation in Spanish-English bilinguals: What does it mean to be "in between"? Appl Psycholinguist 15:417-446.
10. Kalikow DN, Stevens KN, Elliot LL. (1977). Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. J Acoust Soc Am 61:1337-1351.
11. Koch DB, Nilsson MJ, Soli SD. (n.d.). Using the HINT Test on compact disk - manual two. Eden Prairie MN: House Ear Institute, Licensed to Starkey Laboratories.
12. Kreul EJ, Nixon JC, Kryter KD, Bell DW, Lang JS, Schubert ED. (1968). A proposed clinical test of speech discrimination. J Speech Lang Hear Res 11:536-552.
13. Mayo LH, Florentine M, Buus S. (1997). Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res 40:686-693.
14. Moore LS. (1995). Performance of Adults with Normal Hearing on the Synthetic Sentence Identification Tests in English and Spanish. Master's thesis, University of Texas, Austin.
15. Nilsson MJ, Gelnett D, Sullivan J, Soli SD, Goldberg RL. (1992). Norms for the Hearing In Noise Test: The influence of spatial separation, hearing loss, and English language experience on speech reception thresholds. J Acoust Soc Am 92:2385.
16. Ortiz A. (1995). Teacher Observation Student Oral Language Observation Matrix. Classroom supplement. Sacramento, CA: California State Department of Education.
17. Saunders GH, Haggard MP. (1989). The clinical assessment of obscure auditory dysfunction-1. Auditory and psychological factors.Ear Hear 10:200-208.
18. Saunders GH, Haggard MP. (1992). The clinical assessment of "obscure auditory dysfunction" (OAD) 2. Case control analysis of determining factors. Ear Hear 13:241-254.
19. Saunders GH, Field DL, Haggard MR (1992). A clinical test battery for obscure auditory dysfunction (OAD): Development, selection and use of tests. Br J Audiol 26:33-42.
20. Soares C, Grosjean F. (1984). Bilinguals in a monolingual and bilingual speech mode: The effect on lexical access. Mem Cogn 12:380-386.
21. Takata Y, Nabelek AK. (1990). English consonant recognition in noise and in reverberation by Japanese and American listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 88:663-666.
22. Valdes G, Figueroa RA. (1994). Bilingualism and Testing: A Special Case of Bias. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
23. von Hapsburg D, Peña E. (2002). Understanding bilingualism and its impact on speech audiometry. J Speech Lang Hear Res 45:202-213.
24. Weber-Fox C, Neville H. (1992). Maturational constraints on cerebral specialization for language processing: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilingual speakers. Neurosci Abstr 18:335.
25. Weber-Fox C, Neville H. (1999). Functional Neural Subsystems are Differentially affected by delays in second language immersion: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilinguals. In: Birdsong D, ed. Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 23-38.