The effect of context on the processing of type-shifting verbs

Brain and Language

Volumn 90, Issue 1-3, 2004, Pages 249-261

  De Almeida, Roberto G ^a  

^a Gina Cody School of Engineering and Computer Science   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; COMPREHENSION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LANGUAGE; READING; SEMANTICS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

COGNITION; HUMANS; READING; SEMANTICS;

EID: 2542452765     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00438-3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Cohen J., MacWhinney B., Flatt M., Provost J. PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers. 25:1993;257-271
2. de Almeida, R. G. (1999a). The representation of lexical concepts: A psycholinguistic inquiry. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
3. de Almeida R.G. What do category-specific semantic deficits tell us about the representation of lexical concepts? Brain and Language. 68:1999;241-248
4. Fodor J.A. Concepts: Where cognitive science went wrong. 1998;Oxford University Press, New York
5. Fodor, J. A., & Lepore, E. (1998). The emptiness of the lexicon: Critical reflections on J. Pustejovsky's 'The Generative Lexicon'. Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 269-288
6. Jackendoff R. Semantic structures. 1990;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
7. Jackendoff R. The architecture of the language faculty. 1997;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
8. Katz J.J., Fodor J.A. The structure of a semantic theory. Fodor J.A., Katz J.J. The structure of language. 1964;479-519 Prentice-Hall, Englewood, Cliffs, NJ
9. Lakoff G. Toward generative semantics. McCawley J.D. Notes from the linguistic underground. 1976;43-61 Academic Press, New York
10. Lascarides A., Copestake A. Pragmatics and word meaning. Journal of Linguistics. 34:1998;387-414
11. Libben G. Semantic transparency in the processing of compounds: consequences for representation, processing, and impairment. Brain and Language. 61:1998;30-44
12. Mauner G., Koenig J.-P. Lexical encoding of event participant information. Brain and Language. 68:1999;178-184
13. McCawley J.D. Lexical insertion in a transformational grammar without deep structure. Grammar and meaning. 1972;155-166 Academic Press, New York
14. McElree B., Traxler M., Pickering M., Seely R., Jackendoff R. Reading time evidence for enriched composition. Cognition. 78:2001;B17-B25
15. Partee B. Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. Groenendikj D., de Jongh D., Stokhof M. Studies in discourse representation theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers. 1987;115-143 Foris, Dordrecht
16. Pinango M.M., Zurif E., Jackendoff R. Real-time processing implications of enriched composition at the syntax-semantics interface. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 28:1999;395-414
17. Pitt D., Katz J.J. The compositionality of idioms. Language. 76:2000;409-432
18. Pustejovsky J. The generative lexicon. 1995;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
19. Rappaport Hovav M., Levin B. Building verb meanings. Butt M., Geuder W. The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors. 1998;Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford
20. Rice, S. (1988). Unlikely lexical entries. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society
21. Traxler J., McElree B., Pickering M. Coercion in sentence processing: Evidence from eye-movements and self-paced reading. Journal of Memory and Language. 47:2002;530-547