Recent advances in laryngeal sensorimotor control for voice, speech and swallowing

Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 160-165

  Ludlow, Christy L ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE   (United States)

Author keywords

Dysphagia; Laryngeal adductor response; Nerve injury; Neuroprosthesis; Recurrent laryngeal nerve; Thyroidectomy

Indexed keywords

BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN STEM; DYSPHAGIA; HUMAN; LARYNGEAL NERVE; LARYNX MUSCLE; MONKEY; MOTOR CONTROL; NERVE RECONSTRUCTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECURRENT LARYNGEAL NERVE; REVIEW; SPEECH; SWALLOWING; THYROIDECTOMY; TISSUE ENGINEERING; VOCAL CORD; VOICE;

ANIMALS; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN STEM; CEREBRAL CORTEX; DEGLUTITION; HUMANS; LARYNGEAL MUSCLES; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR NEURONS; NERVE NET; RECEPTORS, SENSORY; RECURRENT LARYNGEAL NERVE; SPEECH; VOCAL CORD PARALYSIS; VOICE;

EID: 2542442011     PISSN: 10689508     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.moo.0000120302.58882.13     Document Type: Review

References (73)

1. Desaki J, Yamagata T, Kawakita S: The distribution of ganglion cells in the posterior cricoarytenoid muscle of the normal adult rat. A light and electron microscopic study. Arch Histol Cytol 2003, 66:27-36. The authors suggest that the ganglion cells provide smooth muscle control to the arterioles within the muscle.
2. Desaki J, Kawakita S, Yamagata T: Existence of a muscle spindle on the posterior cricoarytenoid muscle of the guinea pig. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo) 1997, 46:257-261.
3. Desaki J, Kawakita S, Yamagata T, et al.: A novel muscle spindle containing muscle fibres devoid of sensory innervation in the posterior cricoarytenoid muscle of the normal adult guinea pig. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo) 1998, 47:81-85.
4. Enomoto K, Takahashi R, Katada A, et al.: The augmentation of intrinsic laryngeal muscle activity by air-jet stimulation of the nasal cavity in decerebrate cats. Neurosci Res 1998, 31:137-146.
5. Kunibe I, Nonaka S, Katada A, et al.: The neuronal circuit of augmenting effects on intrinsic laryngeal muscle activities induced by nasal air-jet stimulation in decerebrate cats. Brain Res 2003, 978:83-90. The description of changes in laryngeal muscle activity in response to increased nasal flow was previously described. In this paper, the location of neurons in the brainstem that were active for controlling laryngeal muscle activity were recorded.
6. Van Der Velde L, Curran AK, Filiano JJ, et al.: Prolongation of the laryngeal chemoreflex after inhibition of the rostral ventral medulla in piglets: a role in sudden infant death syndrome? J Appl Physiol 2003, 94:1883-1895. This paper identifies the location of neurons that seem to suppress the laryngeal adductor reflex in response to stimuli in the larynx. Further characterization of inputs and neurotransmitters involved in the firing of these neurons may have potential for identifying mechanisms for controlling laryngeal reflexes and respiration.
7. Sun OJ, Berkowitz RG, Goodchild AK, et al.: Substance P inputs to laryngeal motoneurons in the rat. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2003, 137:11-18. Substance P was found to have only a modest role in the control of laryngeal motor neuron drive.
8. Smith JC, Morrison DE, Ellenberger HH, et al.: Brainstem projections to the major respiratory neuron populations in the medulla of the cat. J Comp Neurol 1989, 281:69-96.
9. Jean A: Brain stem control of swallowing: neuronal network and cellular mechanisms. Physiol Rev 2001, 81:929-969.
10. Kim YH, Sasaki CT: Glottic closing force in an anesthetized, awake pig model: biomechanical effects on the laryngeal closure reflex resulting from altered central facilitation. Acta Otolaryngol 2001, 121:310-314.
11. Sasaki CT, Ho S, Kim YH: Critical role of central facilitation in the glottic closure reflex. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2001, 110:401-405.
12. Sasaki CT, Jassin B, Kim YH, et al.: Central facilitation of the glottic closure reflex in humans. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2003, 112:293-297. This paper determines how anesthesia level affects the degree to which the laryngeal adductor reflex is elicited by superior laryngeal nerve stimulation. The laryngeal adductor reflex becomes life-threatening when there is bilateral vocal fold closure causing airway obstruction, At 1.0 minimal alveolar concentration, the contralateral vocal fold did not close and unilateral vocal fold closure was weakened, reducing the possibility of airway closure. The results provide an understanding of the anesthetic effects on laryngospasm during extubation and may explain why airway protection is reduced after prolonged sedation.
13. Kuypers HGJM: Cortico-bulbar connections to the pons and lower brainstem in man. An anatomical study. Brain 1958, 81:364-388.
14. Kuypers HGJM: An anatomical analysis of cortico-bulbar connections to the pons and lower brainstem in the cat. J Anat (Lond) 1958, 92:198-218.
15. Kuypers HGHM: Some projections from the peri-central cortex to the pons and lower brainstem in monkey and chimpanzee. J Comp Neurol 1958, 110:221-255.
16. Simonyan K, Jurgens U: Efferent subcortical projections of the laryngeal motor cortex in the rhesus monkey. Brain Res 2003, 974:43-59. This is a careful study of the cortical to subcortical efferent connections in the rhesus monkey. Using electrical stimulation, the authors identified the cortical region producing vocal fold closure. They injected an anterograde tracer that could be used to identify all those subcortical regions labeled by the tracer. The authors confirmed the fact that there are no direct connections to the laryngeal motor neurons in the brainstem from the cortex. The results suggest that only humans have fine direct cortical control of the laryngeal motor neurons, which may provide the necessary, fine rapid control of the laryngeal muscles needed for speech. A previous study by the same authors examined cortical to cortical connections in the same species.
17. Aviv JE, Martin JH, Keen MS, et al.: Air pulse quantification of supraglottic and pharyngeal sensation: a new technique. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993, 102:777-780,
18. Aviv JE: Effects of aging on sensitivity of the pharyngeal and supraglottic areas. Am J Med 1997, 103:74S-76S.
19. Aviv JE: Sensory discrimination in the larynx and hypopharynx. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997, 116:331-334.
20. Aviv JE, Kim T, Thomson JE, et al.: Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST) in healthy controls. Dysphagia 1998, 13:87-92.
21. Aviv JE, Kim T, Sacco RL, et al.: FEESST: a new bedside endoscopic test of the motor and sensory components of swallowing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1998, 107:378-387.
22. Aviv JE, Martin JH, Kim T, et al.: Laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination testing and the laryngeal adductor reflex. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999, 108:725-730.
23. Cohen MA, Setzen M, Perlman PW, et al.: The safety of flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing in an outpatient otolaryngology setting. Laryngoscope 2003, 113:21-24. This is a replication of previous studies that introduced this technique, but it is reported here in a large series of patients. The authors report good patient acceptance of the fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing procedure when administered without nasal anesthesia.
24. Johnson PE, Belafsky PC, Postma GN: Topical nasal anesthesia for transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy: a prospective, double-blind, cross-over study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003, 128:452-454. The results in this well-done study were somewhat surprising in that intranasal anesthesia did not alter sensory thresholds. The results indicate that nasal anesthesia can be used without invalidating fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing results.
25. Johnson PE, Belafsky PC, Postma GN: Topical nasal anesthesia and laryngopharyngeal sensory testing: a prospective, double-blind crossover study. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2003, 112:14-16. The use of cocaine resulted in significant improvements in comfort during the examination.
26. Bhabu P, Poletto C, Mann E, et al.: Thyroarytenoid muscle responses to air pressure stimulation of the laryngeal mucosa in humans. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2003, 112:834-840. The laryngeal adductor response to air-puff stimulation is later and bilateral in contrast with early unilateral responses that usually occur with electrical stimulation of the superior laryngeal nerve. The occurrence of the adductor response corresponds well with patients' reports of sensation and provided the same sensory thresholds.
27. Ludlow CL, VanPelt F, Koda J: Characteristics of late responses to superior laryngeal nerve stimulation in humans. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1992, 101:127-134.
28. Sasaki CT, Suzuki M: Laryngeal reflexes in cat, dog and man. Arch Otolaryngol 1976, 102:400-402.
29. Aviv JE, Martin JH, Sacco RL, et al.: Supraglottic and pharyngeal sensory abnormalities in stroke patients with dysphagia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996, 105:92-97.
30. Aviv JE, Sacco RL, Mohr JP, et al.: Laryngopharyngeal sensory testing with modified barium swallow as predictors of aspiration pneumonia after stroke. Laryngoscope 1997, 107:1254-1260.
31. Aviv JE, Sacco RL, Thomson J, et al.: Silent laryngopharyngeal sensory deficits after stroke. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1997, 106:87-93.
32. Jafari S, Prince RA, Kim DY, et al.: Sensory regulation of swallowing and airway protection: a role for the internal superior laryngeal nerve in humans. J Physiol 2003, 550:287-304. This was a study in normal volunteers examining the effects of a bilateral block of the superior laryngeal nerve using bupivacaine in the paraglottic compartment. The effects of laryngeal sensory blockade on swallowing were evaluated using video fluoroscopy to identify penetration and aspiration, which were significantly increased with anesthesia versus saline injection. The effects were greater than previous studies using different anesthesia conditions and more rigorous evaluation techniques. The results confirm the important role of sensory feedback for the pharyngeal phase of swallowing but leave the mechanism for this finding undetermined. The authors suggest that it may be reduced laryngeal motor neuron drive after sensory blockade that allows for the reduction in airway protection.
33. Bastian RW, Riggs LC: Role of sensation in swallowing function. Laryngoscope 1999, 109:1974-1977.
34. Ali GN, Laundl TM, Wallace KL, et al.: Influence of mucosal receptors on deglutitive regulation of pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter function. Am J Physiol 1994, 267:G644-G649.
35. Sulica L, Hembree A, Blitzer A: Swallowing and sensation: evaluation of deglutition in the anesthetized larynx. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002, 111:291-294.
36. Sulica L, Blitzer A: Anesthesia for laryngeal surgery in the office. Laryngoscope 2000, 110:1777-1779.
37. Aviv JE, Spitzer J, Cohen M, et al.: Laryngeal adductor reflex and pharyngeal squeeze as predictors of laryngeal penetration and aspiration. Laryngoscope 2002, 112:338-341.
38. Setzen M, Cohen MA, Mattucci KF, et al.: Laryngopharyngeal sensory deficits as a predictor of aspiration. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001, 124:622-624.
39. Setzen M, Cohen MA, Perlman PW, et al.: The association between laryngopharyngeal sensory deficits, pharyngeal motor function, and the prevalence of aspiration with thin liquids. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003, 128:99-102. This is replication of previous studies by Aviv et al. of the association of sensory and pharyngeal movement deficits in dysphagia. However, this is a large prospective study of more than 200 consecutive patients grouped according to motor and sensory deficits on fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing. The authors indicate that aspiration can be expected if a patient with dysphagia has no laryngopharyngeal sensation.
40. Serratrice G, Pellissier JF, Gastaut JL, et al.: Chronic spinal amyotrophy with paralysis of the vocal cords: Young-Harper syndrome. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1984, 140:657-658.
41. Boltshauser E, Lang W, Spillmann T, et al.: Hereditary distal muscular atrophy with vocal cord paralysis and sensorineural hearing loss: a dominant form of spinal muscular atrophy? J Med Genet 1989, 26:105-108.
42. McEntagart M, Norton N, Williams H, et al.: Localization of the gene for distal hereditary motor neuronopathy VII (dHMN-VII) to chromosome 2q14. Am J Hum Genet 2001, 68:1270-1276.
43. McEntagart M, Spurlock G, Jackson C, et al.: Distal spinal muscular atrophy with vocal cord paralysis (dSMA-VII) is not linked to the MPD2 locus on chromosome 5q31. J Med Genet 2000, 37:E14.
44. Young ID, Harper PS: Hereditary distal spinal muscular atrophy with vocal cord paralysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1980, 43:413-508.
45. Puls I, Jonnakuty C, LaMonte BH, et al.: Mutant dynactin in motor neuron disease. Nat Genet 2003, 33:455-456. This is the first finding of a genetic mutation responsible for familial bilateral vocal fold paralysis. Dynactin is an axonal transport protein responsible for retrograde transport from the axonal tip back to the neuron. Related mutations are being found in other familial neuropathies and motor neuronopathies. Axonal transport mechanisms have been implicated in some genetic forms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Kennedy disease, and hereditary sensory motor neuropathy (Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease).
46. Zealear DL, Rainey CL, Jerles ML, et al.: Technical approach for reanimation of the chronically denervated larynx by means of functional electrical stimulation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1994, 103:705-712.
47. Zealear DL, Rainey CL, Herzon GD, et al.: Electrical pacing of the paralyzed human larynx. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996, 105:689-693.
48. Zealear DL, Billante CL, Chongkolwatana C, et al.: The effects of chronic electrical stimulation on laryngeal muscle reinnervation. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2000, 62:87-95.
49. Zealear DL, Billante CR, Chongkolwatana C, et al.: The effects of chronic electrical stimulation on laryngeal muscle physiology and histochemistry. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2000, 62:81-86.
50. Zealear DL, Garren KC, Rodriguez RJ, et al.: The biocompatibility, integrity, and positional stability of an injectable microstimulator for reanimation of the paralyzed larynx. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2001, 48:890-897.
51. Zealear DL, Swelstad MR, Sant'Anna GD, et al.: Determination of the optimal conditions for laryngeal pacing with the Itrel II implantable stimulator. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001, 125:183-192.
52. Zealear DL, Billante CR, Courey MS, et al.: Electrically stimulated glottal opening combined with adductor muscle botox blockade restores both ventilation and voice in a patient with bilateral laryngeal paralysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002, 111:500-506.
53. Billante CR, Zealear DL, Courey MS, et al.: Effect of chronic electrical stimulation of laryngeal muscle on voice. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002, 111:328-332.
54. Zealear DL, Rodriguez RJ, Kenny T, et al.: Electrical stimulation of a denervated muscle promotes selective reinnervation by native over foreign motoneurons. J Neurophysiol 2002, 87:2195-2199.
55. Zealear DL, Billante CR, Courey MS, et al.: Reanimation of the paralyzed human larynx with an implantable electrical stimulation device. Laryngoscope 2003, 113:1149-1156. A neuromuscular implant for chronic stimulation of the posterior cricoarytenoid muscle was placed in six patients with bilateral vocal fold paralysis and resulted in successful decannulation of three patients, which is a modest but exciting result with the first approach that will provide these patients with an adequate airway without compromising voice production.
56. Guindi GM, Bannister R, Gibson WP, et al.: Laryngeal electromyography in multiple system atrophy with autonomic failure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1981, 44:49-53.
57. Marcus B, Edwards B, Yoo S, et al.: Recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring in thyroid and parathyroid surgery: the University of Michigan experience. Laryngoscope 2003, 113:356-361. The authors used a postcricoid surface electrode similar to the one developed by Guidi et al. more than 20 years ago to monitor activity in the posterior cricoarytenoid muscle while stimulating with a disposable recurrent nerve stimulator. This electrode seems smaller and more pliable than the Guidi version. Because of the low rate of RLN injury, a larger sample than the 54 patients reported here need to be studied to evaluate the validity, reliability, and sensitivity of this monitoring technique.
58. Rea JL, Khan A: Clinical evoked electromyography for recurrent laryngeal nerve preservation: use of an endotracheal tube electrode and a postcricoid surface electrode. Laryngoscope 1998, 108:1418-1420.
59. Eisele DW: Intraoperative electrophysiologic monitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Laryngoscope 1996, 106:443-449.
60. Bigelow DC, Patterson T, Weber R, et al.: Comparison of endotracheal tube and hookwire electrodes for monitoring the vagus nerve. J Clin Monit Comput 2002, 17:217-220.
61. Scheuller MC, Ellison D: Laryngeal mask anesthesia with intraoperative laryngoscopy for identification of the recurrent laryngeal nerve during thyroidectomy. Laryngoscope 2002, 112:1594-1597.
62. Otto RA, Cochran CS: Sensitivity and specificity of intraoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve stimulation in predicting postoperative nerve paralysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002, 111:1005-1007.
63. Kunath M, Marusch F, Horschig P, et al.: [The value of intraoperative neuromonitoring in thyroid surgery-a prospective observational study with 926 patients.] Zentralbl Chir 2003, 128:187-190. This is a large, prospective series of patients evaluated using neuromotor monitoring, which was able to provide estimates on the incidence of RLN injury in different types of thyroid surgery. The article concludes that neuromotor monitoring should be routine in cases of repeat surgery or malignancy.
64. Hiroto I, Hirano M, Tomita H: Electromyographic investigation of human vocal fold paralysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1967, 77:296-304.
65. Flint PW, Downs DH, Coltrera MD: Laryngeal synkinesis following reinnervation in the rat: neuroanatomic and physiologic study using retrograde fluorescent tracers and electromyography. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991, 100:797-806.
66. Zealear DL, Hamdan AL, Rainey CL: Effects of denervation on posterior cricoarytenoid muscle physiology and histochemistry. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1994, 103:780-788.
67. Damrose EJ, Huang RY, Blumin JH, et al.: Lack of evoked laryngeal electromyography response in patients with a clinical diagnosis of vocal cord paralysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2001, 110:815-819.
68. Berke GS, Blackwell KE, Gerratt RR, et al.: Selective laryngeal adductor denervation-reinnervation: a new surgical treatment for adductor spasmodic dysphonia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999, 108:227-231.
69. Allegretto M, Morrison M, Rammage L, et al.: Selective denervation: reinnervation for the control of adductor spasmodic dysphonia. J Otolaryngol 2003, 32:185-189. This is the first report of others using the Berke selective denervation and reinnervation technique in patients with adductor spasmodic dysphonia. The surgery was performed in six patients and was successful in five of the six who had improved voice function and no longer required Botulinum toxin injections for symptom control.
70. Damrose EJ, Berke GS: Advances in the management of glottic insufficiency. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003, 11:480-484.
71. Damrose EJ, Huang RY, Ye M, et al.: Surgical anatomy of the recurrent laryngeal nerve: implications for laryngeal reinnervation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2003, 11;2:434-438. Intralaryngeal anatomy of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in 10 human larynges examined the branching patterns of the adductor and abductor fibers. This is essential information that is useful for future selective denervation and reinnervation techniques for the treatment of vocal fold paralysis
72. Kanemaru S, Nakamura T, Omori K, et al.: Regeneration of the vocal fold using autologous mesenchymal stem cells. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2003, 112:915-920. Autologous mesenchymal stem cells were implanted into the right vocal fold in Beagle dogs and harvested 4 days later. Histology indicated that regeneration of the injured vocal fold. This is a significant demonstration of tissue engineering for the regeneration of laryngeal tissue.
73. Kanemaru S, Nakamura T, Omori K, et al.: Recurrent laryngeal nerve regeneration by tissue engineering. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2003, 112:492-498. A nerve conduit polyglycolic acid tube coated with collagen was found to guide and enhance reinnervation superior to an autologous nerve graft.