Aerodynamics, voice quality, and laryngeal image analysis of normal and pathologic voices

Current Opinion in Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 166-173

  Yumoto, Eiji ^a  

^a KUMAMOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Stroboscopy; Three dimensional CT endoscopy; Videokymography

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FUNCTION TEST; HOARSENESS; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; PHONATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STROBOSCOPY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VIDEOKYMOGRAPHY; VIDEOSTROBOSCOPY; VOCAL CORD; VOICE;

HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KYMOGRAPHY; LARYNGOSCOPY; PHONATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PULMONARY VENTILATION; REFERENCE VALUES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VIDEO RECORDING; VOCAL CORD PARALYSIS; VOCAL CORDS; VOICE DISORDERS; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 2542441043     PISSN: 10689508     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.moo.0000122306.42961.44     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Sawashima M, Honda K, Aoki Y: Use of the airway interruption for evaluating aerodynamic conditions in phonation. Jpn J Logop Phoniatr 1987, 28:257-264.
2. Smitheran JR, Hixon TJ: A clinical method for estimating laryngeal airway resistance during vowel production. J Speech Hear Disord 1981, 46:138-146.
3. Kitajima K, Fujita F: Estimation of subglottal pressure with intraoral pressure. Acta Otolaryngol 1990, 109:473-478.
4. Hirano M, Koike Y, von Leden H: Maximum phonation time and air usage during phonation. Folia Phoniatr 1968, 20:185-201.
5. Liebermann P: Some acoustic measures of the fundamental periodicity of normal and pathologic larynges. J Acoust Soc Am 1963, 35:344-353.
6. Koike Y: Vowel amplitude modulations in patients with laryngeal diseases. J Acoust Soc Am 1969, 45:839-844.
7. Yumoto E, Gould WJ, Baer T: Harmonics-to-noise ratio as an index of the degree of hoarseness. J Acoust Soc Am 1982, 71:1544-1550.
8. Hirano M: Clinical Examination of Voice. Wien: Springer-Verlag; 1981: 81-84.
9. Webb AL, Carding PN, Deary IJ, et al.: The reliability of three perceptual evaluation scales for dysphonia. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2003, 260 [Epub ahead of print]. This study assessed the reliability of three common auditory scales in voice quality: the Buffalo Voice Profile, the Vocal Profile Analysis Scheme, and the GRBAS scale.
10. Wuyts FL, Heylen L, Mertens F, et al.: Effects of age, sex, and disorder on voice range profile characteristics of 230 children. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2003, 112:540-548. The effect of age, gender, and disorder on the vocal performance of children was investigated by means of the voice range profile.
11. Gardner GM, Parnes SM: Status of the mucosal wave post vocal cord injection versus thyroplasty. J Voice 1991, 5:64-73.
12. Thompson DM, Maragos NE, Edwards BW: The study of vocal fold vibratory patterns in patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis before and after type I thyroplasty with or without arytenoid adduction. Laryngoscope 1995, 105: 481-486.
13. D'Antonio LL, Wigley TL, Zimmerman GJ: Quantitative measures of laryngeal function following Teflon injection or thyroplasty type I. Laryngoscope 1995, 105:256-262.
14. Lu FL, Casiano RR, Lundy DS, et al.: Longitudinal evaluation of vocal function after thyroplasty type I in the treatment of unilateral vocal paralysis. Laryngoscope 1996, 106:573-577.
15. Chertri DK, Geratt BR, Kreiman J, et al.: Combined arytenoid adduction and laryngeal reinnervation in the treatment of vocal fold paralysis. Laryngoscope 1999, 109:1928-1936.
16. Muse AM, Montgomery WW, Hillman RE, et al.: Montgomery thyroplasty implant for vocal fold immobility: phonatory outcomes. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2000, 109:393-400.
17. Omori K, Slavit DH, Kacker A, et al.: Quantitative criteria for predicting thyroplasty type I outcome. Laryngoscope 1996, 106:689-693.
18. Omori K, Kacker A, Slavit DH, et al.: Quantitative videostroboscopic measurement of glottal gap and vocal function: an analysis of thyroplasty type I. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1996, 105:280-285.
19. Omori K, Slavit DH, Matos C, et al.: Vocal fold atrophy: quantitative glottic measurement and vocal function. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1997, 106:544-551.
20. Omori K, Slavit DH, Matos C, et al.: Influence of size and etiology of glottal gap in glottic incompetence dysphonia. Laryngoscope 1998, 108:514-518.
21. Omori K, Slavit DH, Kacker A, et al.: Effects of thyroplasty type I on vocal fold vibration. Laryngoscope 2000, 110:1086-1091.
22. Shin E, Nam SY, Yoo SJ, et al.: Analysis of voice and quantitative measurement of glottal gap after thyroplasty type I in the treatment of unilateral vocal paralysis. J Voice 2002, 16:136-142.
23. Hong KH, Jung KS: Arytenoid appearance and vertical level difference between the paralyzed and innervated vocal cords. Laryngoscope 2001, 111: 227-232.
24. Schuberth S, Hoppe U, Dollinger M, et al.: High-precision measurement of the vocal fold length and vibratory amplitudes. Laryngoscope 2002, 112: 1043-1049.
25. Hanson DG, Jiang J, D'Agostino MM, et al.: Clinical measurement of mucosal wave velocity using simultaneous photoglottography and laryngostroboscopy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995, 104:340-349.
26. Svec JG, Schutte HK: Videokymography: high-speed line scanning of vocal fold vibration. J Voice 1996, 10:201-205.
27. Schutte HK, Svec JG, Sram F: First results of clinical application of videoky mography. Laryngoscope 1998, 108:1206-1210.
28. Inagi K, Khidr AA, Ford CN, et al.: Correlation between vocal functions and glottal measurements in patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Laryngoscope 1997, 107:782-791.
29. Gray SD, Bielamowicz SA, Titze IR, et al.: Experimental approaches to vocal fold alteration: introduction to the minithyrotomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999, 108:1-9.
30. Isshiki N, Ishikawa T: Diagnostic value of tomography in unilateral vocal cord paralysis. Laryngoscope 1976, 86:1573-1578.
31. Agarwal M, Scherer RC, Hollien H: The false vocal folds: shape and size in frontal view during phonation based on laminographic tracings. J Voice 2003, 17:97-113.
32. Bryant NJ, Gracco C, Sasaki CT, et al.: MRI evaluation of vocal fold paralysis before and after type I thyroplasty. Laryngoscope 1996, 106:1386-1392.
33. Laccourreye O, Bely N, Crevier-Buchman L, et al.: Computerized tomography of the glottis after intracordal autologous fat injection. J Laryngol Otol 1998, 112:971-972.
34. Safak MA, Gocmen H, Korkmaz H, et al.: Computerized tomographic alignment of Silastic implant in type 1 thyroplasty. Am J Otolaryngol 2000, 21: 179-183.
35. Zinreich SJ, Mattox DE, Kennedy DW, et al.: 3-D CT for cranial facial and laryngeal surgery. Laryngoscope 1988, 98:1212-1219.
36. Silverman PM, Zeiberg AS, Sessions RB, et al.: Three-dimensional imaging of the hypopharynx and larynx by means of helical (spiral) computed tomography: comparison of radiological and otolaryngological evaluation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995, 104:425-431.
37. Zeiberg AS, Silverman PM, Sessions RB, et al.: Helical (spiral) CT of the upper airway with three-dimensional imaging: technique and clinical assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996, 166:293-299.
38. Yumoto E, Sanuki T, Hyodo M, et al.: Three-dimensional endoscopic mode for observation of laryngeal structures by helical computed tomography. Laryngoscope 1997, 107:1530-1537.
39. Yumoto E, Sanuki T, Hyodo M: Three-dimensional endoscopic images of vocal fold paralysis by computed tomography. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999, 125:883-890.
40. Yumoto E, Nakano K, Oyamada Y: Relationship between 3D behavior of the unilaterally paralyzed larynx and aerodynamic vocal function. Acta Otolaryngol 2003, 123:274-278. The authors succeeded in demonstrating the relationship between the 3D characteristics of the unilaterally immobile larynx and the results of an aerodynamic phonatory function test.
41. Tanaka S, Chijiwa K, Hirano M: Study of over-adduction of the unaffected vocal fold in unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis. Larynx Japan 1993, 5:135-141.