The precise time course of lexical activation: MEG measurements of the effects of frequency, probability, and density in lexical decision

Brain and Language

Volumn 90, Issue 1-3, 2004, Pages 88-94

  Stockall, Linnaea ^a   Stringfellow, Andrew ^a   Marantz, Alec ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Lexical access; Lexical decision; Lexical frequency; M350; MEG; Neighborhood density effects; Phonotactic probability

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AUTOMATION; BOOK; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DENSITY; FEMALE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PHONETICS; PROBABILITY; READING; TIME; WORD RECOGNITION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CEREBRAL CORTEX; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; READING;

EID: 2542438635     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00422-X     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Adachi, Y., Shimogawara, M., Higuchi, M., Haruta, Y., & Ochiai, M. (2001). Reduction of nonperiodical extramural magnetic noise in MEG measurement by continuously adjusted least squares method. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, ASC2000, Virginia Beach
2. Cohen J.D., MacWhinney B., Flatt M., Provost J. PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers. 252:1993;257-271
3. Embick D., Hackl M., Schaeffer J., Kelepir M., Marantz A. A magnetoencephalographic component whose latency reflects lexical frequency. Cognitive Brain Research. 10(3):2001;345-348
4. Helenius P., Salmelin R., Service E., Connolly J.F. Distinct time courses of word and context comprehension in the left temporal cortex. Brain. 121:1998;1133-1142
5. Helenius P., Salmelin R., Service E., Connolly J.F. Semantic cortical activation in dyslexic readers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 11(5):1999;535-550
6. Koyama S., Kakigi R., Hoshiyama M., Kitamura Y. Reading of Japanese Kanji (morphograms) and Kana (syllabograms): A magnetoencephalographic study. Neuropsychologia. 36(1):1998;83-98
7. Kucera H., Francis W.N. Computational analysis of present-day American English. 1967;Brown University Press, Providence, RI
8. Kuriki S., Takauchi F., Fujimaki N., Kobayashi T. Magnetoencephalographic study on the cerebral neural activities related to the processing of visually presented characters. Cognitive Brain Research. 4:1996;185-199
9. Luce P.A., Goldinger S.D., Auer E.T., Vitevitch M.S. Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN. Perception and Psychophysics. 62:2000;615-625
10. Luce P.A., Pisoni D.B. Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing. 19:1998;1-36
11. Luce A., Large N. Phonotactics, density, and entropy in spoken word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes. 16(5/6):2001;565-581
12. Pylkkänen L., Marantz A. Tracking the time course of word recognition with MEG. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 7:2003;187-189
13. Pylkkänen, L., Stringfellow, A., Flagg, E., & Marantz, A., (2000). A neural response sensitive to repetition and phonotactic probability: MEG investigations of lexical access. Proceedings of Biomag 2000, Helsinki, Finland
14. Pylkkänen L., Stringfellow A., Marantz A. Neuromagnetic evidence for the timing of lexical activation: An MEG component sensitive to phonotactic probability but not to neighborhood density. Brain and Language. 81:2002;666-678
15. Sekiguchi T., Koyama S., Kakigi R. The effect of word repetition on evoked magnetic responses in the human brain. Japanese Psychological Research. 42:2000;3-14
16. Tarkiainen A., Helenius P., Hansen P.C., Cornelissen P.L., Salmelin R. Dynamics of letter string perception in the human occiptotemporal cortex. Brain. 122:1999;2119-2132
17. Vitevitch M.S., Luce P.A. Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language. 40:1999;374-408