Optical stark effect in a quantum dot: Ultrafast control of single exciton polarizations

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 92, Issue 15, 2004, Pages

  Unold, Thomas ^a   Mueller, Kerstin ^a   Lienau, Christoph ^a   Elsaesser, Thomas ^a   Wieck, Andreas D ^b  

^a MAX BORN INSTITUT   (Germany)

^b RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTROMAGNETIC DISPERSION; EXCITONS; INTERFACES (MATERIALS); LIGHT POLARIZATION; NANOTECHNOLOGY; OPTICAL MICROSCOPY; OSCILLATIONS; PHASE SHIFT; RESONANCE; SPECTRUM ANALYSIS; ULTRAFAST PHENOMENA;

BIEXCITONS; COHERENT EXCITATIONS; EXCITON POLARIZATION; LIGHT-INDUCED BLUESHIFT;

SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOTS;

EID: 2542436332     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.157401     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. N. H. Bonadeo et al., Science 282, 1473 (1998).
2. E. Biolatti et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5647 (2000).
3. P. Chen, C. Piermarocchi, and L.J. Sham, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 067401 (2001).
4. J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4091 (1995).
5. B. R. Mollow, Phys. Rev. A 5, 2217 (1972).
6. H. Häffner al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 143602 (2003).
7. A. Mysyrowicz et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2748 (1986).
8. W. H. Knox et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1189 (1989).
9. C. Sieh et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3112 (1999), and references therein.
10. M. Saba et al., Phys. Rev. B 62, R16322 (2000).
11. S. Schmitt-Rink and D.S. Chemla, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2752 (1986).
12. M. Combescot and R. Combescot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 117 (1988).
13. C. Ell et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 304 (1989).
14. K. Brunner et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1138 (1994).
15. D. Gammon et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3005 (1996).
16. P. Borri et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 157401 (2001).
17. N.H. Bonadeo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2759 (1998).
18. T.H. Stievater et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 133603 (2001).
19. T. Guenther et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 057401 (2002).
20. H. Kamada et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 246401 (2001).
21. A. Zrenner et al., Nature (London) 418, 612 (2002).
22. F. Intonti et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 076801 (2001).
23. 2QD, ≃ 30-50 ps [1]. The decay of ΔR at Δt < 0 is thus mainly limited by our finite monochromator resolution.
24. Y.H. Ahn et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 237403 (2002).
25. B. Fluegel et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2588 (1987).
26. T. H. Stievater et al., Phys. Rev. B 65, 205319 (2002).