A unifying framework for representing structural and operational aspects of electricity sector deregulation

Requirements Engineering

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 23-37

  Prekas, Nikos ^a   Loucopoulos, Pericles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Actor Role Modelling; Deregulation; Electricity supply industry; Models; Operation; Structure

Indexed keywords

EID: 2542433923     PISSN: 09473602     EISSN: 1432010X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s007660070019     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Armstrong M, Cowan S, Vickers J. Regulatory reform: economic analysis and British experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994
2. Jackson P, Price C (eds). Privatisation and regulation: a review of the issues. Longman, Harlow, UK, 1994
3. International Energy Agency (IEA), Standing Group on Long Term Co-operation. Electricity supply industry structure, ownership and regulation in OECD countries. Report no. IEA/ SLT(94)4/RLV1, Paris, 1994
4. Adamantiades A, Besant-Jones J, Hoskote M. Power sector reform in developing countries and the role of the World Bank. Joint UNIPLDL/WEC committee on the performance of thermal generating plant, working group session 8, report no. 8.12, 1995
5. Loucopoulos P. Conceptual modelling: introduction. In: Loucopoulos P, Zicari R (eds). Conceptual modelling, databases and CASE: an integrated view of information systems development. Wiley, New York, 1992, pp 1-26
6. Mylopoulos J. Conceptual modelling and Telos. In: Loucopoulos P, Zicari R (eds). Conceptual modelling, databases and CASE: an integrated view of information systems development. Wiley, New York, 1992, pp 49-68
7. Butler KA, Esposito C, Hebron R. Connecting the design of software to the design of work. Commun ACM 1999;42(1):38-46
8. Kaindl H, Carroll JM. Symbolic modeling in practice. Commun ACM 1999;42(1):28-30
9. Yajima M. Deregulatory reforms of the electricity supply industry. Quorum Books, Westport, CT, 1997
10. International Union of Producers and Distributors of Electrical Energy (UNIPEDE). How does the electricity supply industry conduct change? - managers reply. (Trilingual report, in English, French, German), report no. 00300Ren9445, Paris, 1994
11. Yajima M et al. Deregulatory reform of the electricity supply industry: international status of deregulatory reforms. Research report no. EY95001, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, Japan, 1995
12. Nelson L, Dowling PJ. Electricity industry reform: a case analysis in Australia. J Org Change Manage 1998;11(6):481-495
13. Holms A. Privatising British electricity: restructuring and resistance. Financial Times Management Report, London, 1992
14. A nasty shock: electricity deregulation. Economist 1996; 338(7947):20-21
15. Delevet P. Consumers still confused over electricity deregulation. Bus J 1998;16(19):10.
16. Nikiforuk A. Bright lights, big mistake (defects in the electricity deregulation of Alberta, Canada). Canad Bus 1998;71(20):79-82
17. Weimer DA. Utilities (complications of electricity deregulation). Bus Week 1999;11 January:138
18. Esser C. Umstrukturierung und Privatisierung der Elektrizitätswirtschaft in England und Wales. VDEW-Verlag, Frankfurt, 1990
19. Surrey J (ed). The British electricity experiment: privatization: the record, the issues, the lessons. Earthscan, London, 1996
20. Thomas R, Schneider T. Underlying technical issues in electricity deregulation. In: Proceedings of the 30th annual Hawaii international conference on systems sciences, Vol 5, Wailea, Hawaii, 1997. IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, DC, pp 561-570
21. European Grouping of the Electricity Supply Industry (Eurelectric). What form of competition for the electric supply industry sector in Europe? Position of the continental members of Eurelectric. Elektrizitätswirtschaft 1991;90(12):640-650
22. Capouet Y. Completion of the internal market for electricity and gas. Energy Eur 1992;19:9-13
23. Wilsher P. Decisions that will help crack the energy iceberg. Manage Today 1993;January:21-22
24. Commission of the European Communities. Working paper of the Commission on the organisation of the internal electricity market. Paper no. SEC (95) 464 final, Brussels, 1995
25. Stevenson R. Social goals and partial deregulation of the electric utility industry. J Econ Issues 1994;28(2):403-413
26. Brotman SN (ed). The telecommunications deregulation sourcebook. Artech House, Boston/London, 1987
27. Clarke H. Clock ticks for telecoms sector. European 1995;26 October:21
28. Competition calling: telecoms deregulation. Economist 1995; 336(7921):59-60
29. Button K (ed). Airline deregulation. New York University Press, New York, 1991
30. Gaynor M, Trapani III JM. Quantity, quality and the welfare effects of US airline deregulation. Appl Econ 1994;26(5):543-550
31. Freedom in the air: airlines. Economist 1997;342(8011):62-63
32. Gart A. Regulation, deregulation, reregulation: the future of the banking, insurance, and securities industries. Wiley, New York, 1994
33. Bigbie JE. Bye-bye to the branch. Banker 1996;146(846):21-23
34. Jayaratne J, Strahan PE. The finance-growth nexus: evidence from bank branch deregulation. Q J Econ 1996;111(3):639-670
35. Loucopoulos P, Kavakli V, Prekas N, Rolland C, Grosz G, Nurcan S. Using the EKD approach: the modelling component. ELEKTRA project report no. ELEKTRA/WP2/T2.1/UMIST/1, Manchester, 1997
36. Singh B, Rein GL. Role interaction nets (RINs): a process definition formalism. MCC, 1992.
37. Dobson JA, Blyth AJC, Chudge J, Strens R. The ORDIT approach to organisational requirements. In: Jirotka M, Goguen JA (eds). Requirements engineering: social and technical issues. Academic Press, London, 1994, pp 87-106
38. Yu E. Modelling strategic relationships for process reengineering. PhD thesis, University of Toronto, 1994
39. Ould M. Business processes: modelling and analysis for reengineering and improvement. Wiley, Chichester, UK, 1995
40. Alvarado F, Camfield R. Rajaraman R. Open transmission access: an efficient minimal role for the ISO. In: Proceedings of the 30th annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Vol 5, Wailea, Hawaii, 1997. IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, DC, pp 571-578
41. Varaiya P, Wu F. MinISO: a minimal independent system operator. In: Proceedings of the 30th annual Hawaii international conference on systems sciences, Vol V, Wailea, Hawaii, 1997. IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, DC, pp 602-607
42. PPC prepares for competition. Power Eur 1997;252:4-5
43. Prekas N, Dimitromanolaki I, Loucopoulos P. Reform models for ESI companies. ELEKTRA project report no. ELEKTRA/WP3/ T3.2/UMIST/2, Version 2, Manchester, 1998
44. Prekas N, Loucopoulos P, Dimitromanolaki I. Developing models of reform for electricity supply industry companies. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IMACS international conference on circuits, systems and computers - IMACS-CSC '98, Vol 1, Athens, 1998. Hellenic Naval Academy, pp 337-342