The interface of organizational effectiveness and corporate social performance: Opportunities for research and theory development

Business and Society

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 194-214

  Lachman, Ran ^a   Wolfe, Richard A ^b  

^a College of Management ^*  (Israel)

^b WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2542431859     PISSN: 00076503     EISSN: 14678594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/000765039703600205     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aupperle, K. E., A. B. Carroll, and J. D. Hatfield. 1985. "An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability."Academy of Management Journal28:446-463.
2. Bessent, A., W. Bessent, J. Kennington, and B. Regan. 1982. "An Application of Mathematical Programniing to Assess the Productivity in the Houston School District."Management Science28:1355-1367.
3. Cameron, K. 1978. "Measuring Organizational Effectiveness in Institutions of Higher Education."Administrative Science Quarterly23:604-632.
4. Cameron, K. 1981. 'The Enigma of Organizational Effectiveness.' Pp. 1-13 in D. Baugher (ed.), New Directions for Program Evaluation: Measuring Effectiveness, vol. 11. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Cameron, K. 1986. "Effectiveness as Paradox: Consensus and Conflict in Conceptions of Organizational Effectiveness."Management Science32:539-553.
6. Cameron, K., and D. Whetton. 1983. Organizational Effectiveness: A Comparison of Multiple Models. New York: Academic Press.
7. Carroll, A. E. 1979. "A Three Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance."Academy of Management Review4:497-505.
8. Clarkson, M. B. 1991. "Defining, Evaluating, and Managing Corporate Social Performance: The Stakeholder Management Model." Pp. 331-358 in J. Post (ed.),-Researrh in Corporate Social Perfiormance and Policy, vol. 13. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
9. Clarkson, M. B. 1995. "A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance."Academy of Management Review20:92-117.
10. Connolly, T., E. J. Conlon, and S. J. Deutsch. 1980. "Organizational Effectiveness: AMultiple Constituency Approach."Academy of Management Review5:211-217.
11. Etzioni, A. 1960. "TWo Approaches to Organizational Analysis: A Critique and a Suggestion."Administrative Science Quarterly5:257-278.
12. Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic Management: A StakeholderApproach. New York: Harper Collins.
13. Gaertner, G. H., and S. Ramnarayan. 1983. "Organizational Effectiveness: An Altemative Perspective."Academy of Management Review8:97-107.
14. Gatewood, R. D., and A. B. Carroll. 1991. "Assessment of Ethical Performance of Organizational Members: A Conceptual Framework."Academy of Management Review16:667-690.
15. Jones, T. M. 1995. "Instrumental StakeholderTheory: ASynthesis of Ethics andEconomics."Academy of Management Review20:404-437.
16. Katz, D., and R. L. Kahn. 1966. The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York: John Wiley.
17. Keeley, M. 1978. "A Social Justice Approach to Organizational Analysis."Administrative Science Quarterly22:272-292.
18. Keeley, M. 1984. "Impartiality and Participant Interest Theories of Organizational Effectiveness."Administrative Science Quarterly29:1-25.
19. Keinan, G., and R. Lachman. 1994. "Criteria for Assessing the Effectiveness of Homes-for-the-Mentally Challenged in Israel: A Multiple Constituency Perspective."Issues in Special Education and Rehabilitation9 (2): 22-40.
20. Lachman R. Forthcoming. "Forms of Technology and Effectiveness in Health-Care Organizations: The Case of Infertility Clinics."International Journal of Technology Management.
21. Lachman, R., and S. Noy. Forthcoming. BlackMarket Undera White Gown. Tel-Aviv, Israel: Tel-Aviv University Press.
22. Lewin, A., and J. Minton. 1986. "Determining Organizational Effectiveness: Another Look, and an Agenda for Research."Management Science32:514-538.
23. Lewin, A., R. Morey, and T. Cook. 1982. "Evaluating the Administrative Efficiency of Courts."Omega10:401-411.
24. Likert, R. 1967. The Human Organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.
25. McGuire, J., A. Sundgren, and T. Schneeweis. 1988. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance."Academy of Management Journal31:854-872.
26. Miles, R. H. 1980. Macro-Organizational Behavior. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
27. Miles, R. H. 1987. Managing the Corporate Social Environment: A Grounded Theory. Engle wood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28. Mohr, L. B. 1983. "The Implications of Effectiveness Theory for Managerial Practice in the Public Sector." Pp. 225-239 in K. Cameron and D. Whetton (eds.), Organizational Effectiveness: A Comparison of Multiple Models. New York: Academic Press.
29. Nord, W. R. 1983. "A Political-Economic Perspective on Organizational Effectiveness." Pp. 95-133 in K. Cameron and D. Whetton (eds.), Organizational Effectiveness: A Comparison of Multiple Models. New York: Academic Press.
30. Reed, L., K. Getz, D. Collins, W. Oberman, and R. Toy. 1990. "Theoretical Models and Empirical Results: A Review and Synthesis of JAI Volumes 1-10." Pp. 27-62 in L. E. Preston (ed.), Corporation and Society Research: Studies in Theory and Measurement. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
31. Rockness, J., and P. Schlachter. 1988. "Directions for Social Accounting Research: A Survey of Potential Data Sources." Pp. 83-94 in B. Merino and T. Tinker (eds.), Advances in Public InterestAccounting, vol. 2. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
32. Rohrbaugh, J. 1981. "Operationalizing the Competing Values Approach: Measuring Performance in the Employment Service."Public Productivity Review5:141-159.
33. Salancik, G. R. 1984. "A Single Value Function for Evaluating Organizations With Multiple Constituencies."Academy of Management Review9:617-625.
34. Schendel, D. E., and C. W. Hofer. 1979. Strategic Management: A New View of Business Policy and Planning. Boston: Little, Brown.
35. Sethi, P. S. 1995. "Introduction to AMR's Special Topic Forum on Shifting Paradigms: Societal Expectations and Corporate Performance."Academy of Management Review20:18-21.
36. Tsui, A. 1990. "A Multiple Constituency Model of Effectiveness: An Empirical Investigation at the Human Resource Subunit Level."Administrative Science Quarterly35:458-483.
37. Ullmann, A. 1985. "Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance."Academy of Management Review10:540-577.
38. Wagner, J., and B. Schneider. 1987. "Legal Regulation and the Constraint of Constituent Satisfaction."Journal of Management Studies24:189-200.
39. Wokutch, R. E., and L. Fahey. 1986. "A Value Explicit Approach for Evaluating Corporate Social Performance."Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,5:191-215.
40. Wokutch, R. E., and E. W. McKinney. 1991. "Behavioral and Perceptual Measures of Corporate Social Performance." In J. Post (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, vol. 13. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
41. Wolfe, R. A., R. P. Gephart, and T. Johnson. 1993. "Computer Facilitated Qualitative Data Analysis: Potential Contributions to Management Research."Joumal of Management19:637-660.
42. Wood, D. J. 1991a. "Corporate Social Performance Revisited."Academy of Management Review16:691-718.
43. Wood, D. J. 1991b. "Social Issues in Management: Research and Theory in Corporate Social Performance."Journal of Management17:383-406.
44. Yuchtman, R. F., and S. Seashore. 1967. "A System Resource Approach to Organizational Effectiveness."American Sociological Review32:891-903.
45. Zammuto, R. F. 1984. "A Comparison of Multiple Constituency Models of Organizational Effectiveness."Academy of Management Review9:606-616.