Emerging issues in forensic mental health

Psychiatric Quarterly

Volumn 75, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 3-19

  Petrila, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Forensics; Mental health policy; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY CARE; COURT; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; GROUP THERAPY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MENTAL DEFICIENCY; MENTAL HEALTH; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PREDICTION; PROBABILITY; PUNISHMENT; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; RISK MANAGEMENT; RISK REDUCTION; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; TREATMENT PLANNING; ARTICLE; CRIMINAL LAW; JUVENILE DELINQUENCY; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRISON; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

COERCION; COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; CRIMINAL LAW; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMANS; JUVENILE DELINQUENCY; PRISONS; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 2542431381     PISSN: 00332720     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:PSAQ.0000007558.57376.57     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Steadman H: Insanity acquittals in New York State, 1965-1978. American Journal of Psychiatry 137:321-326, 1980.
2. Monahan J: Predicting violent behavior: An assessment of clinical techniques. London, Sage, 1981.
3. Ennis BJ, Litwack TR: Psychology and the presumption of expertise: Flipping coins in the courtroom. California Law Review 62:671-693, 1974.
4. Bluestone H, Melella, J: A study of criminal defendants referred for competency to stand trial in New York City. Bulletin of The American Academy of Psychiatry and Law 7:166-178, 1979.
5. Petrila, J, Selle, J, Rouse, RC, et al: The pretrial examination process in Missouri: A descriptive study. Bulletin of The American Academy of Psychiatry and Law 9: 60-85, 1981.
6. Jackson v: Indiana, 406 U.S. 715, 1972.
7. Melton G, Petrila J, Poythress N, et al: Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers, 2nd ed. New York, Guilford Press, 1997.
8. Monahan J, Steadman HJ, Silver E, et al: Rethinking Risk Assessment: The MacArthur Study of Mental Disorder and Violence. London, Oxford University Press, 2001.
9. Poythress NG, Nicholson R, Otto RK, et al: MacCAT-CA: The MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool - Criminal Adjudication (Professional Manual). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1999.
10. Rogers R, Ustad KL, Sewell KW, et al: Dimensions of in competency: A factor analytic study of the Georgia court competency test. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 14:323-330, 1996.
11. Webster CD, Douglas KS, Eaves D, et al: HCR-20: Assessing Risk for Violence, Version 2. Burnaby, BC, Simon Fraser University, 1997.
12. Steadman HJ, Silver E, Monahan J, et al: A classification tree approach to the development of actuarial violence risk assessment tools. Law and Human Behavior 24:83-100, 2000.
13. Quinsey VL, Harris GT, Rice ME, et al: Violent offenders: Appraising and Managing risk. Washington DC, American Psychological Association, 1998.
14. Rodgers R: Clinical Assessment of Malingering and Deception, 2nd ed. New York, Guilford Press, 1997.
15. Hare RD: Manual for the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Toronto ON, MultiHealth Systems, 1991.
16. Otto RK, Heilbruni K: The practice of forensic psychology: A look toward the future in light of the past. American Psychologist 57:5-18, 2002.
17. Dvoskin JA, Steadman HJ: Using intensive case management to reduce violence by mentally ill persons in the community. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 47:679-684, 1994.
18. Dvoskin JA, Heilbrun K: Risk assessment and release decision-making: Toward resolving the great debate. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 29:6-10, 2001.
19. Hodgins S (ed): Violence Among the Mentally Ill: Effective Treatment and Management Strategies. Boston, Kluwer Academic, 2000.
20. Borum R, Otto R: Advances in forensic assessment and treatment. Law and Human Behavior 24:1-7, 2000.
21. Hare R, Clar D, Grann M, et al: Psychopathy and the predictive validity of the PCL-R: An international perspective. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 18:623-645, 2000.
22. Dvoskin J: Knowledge is not power - knowledge is obligation. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 30:533-540, 2002.
23. Hart S, Cox D, Hare R: Manual for the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL:SV). Toronto, Multi-Health Systems, 1995.
24. Skeem JL, Monahan J, Mulvey EP: Psychopathy, treatment involvement, and subsequent violence among civil psychiatric patients. Law and Human Behavior 26:577-603, 2002.
25. US Department of Justice. Mental Health and Treatment of Inmates and Probationers. Washington DC, Bureau of Justice Statistics, United States Department of Justice, 1999.
26. Dreyfuss RC: The sixth Abraham L. Pomerantz lecture: Forums of the future: The role of specialized courts in resolving business disputes. Brooklyn Law Review 61:1-16, 1995).
27. Petrila J: An introduction to special jurisdiction courts. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 26:3-12, 2003.
28. Hora PF, Schma WG, Rosenthal JT: Therapeutic jurisprudence and the drug treatment court movement: Revolutionizing the criminal justice system's response to drug abuse and crime in America. Notre Dame Law Review 74:439-537, 1999.
29. Goldkamp JS: The drug court response: Issues and implications for justice change. Albany Law Review 63:923-961, 2000.
30. Maxwell S: Sanction threats in court-ordered programs: Examining their effects on offenders mandated into drug treatment. Crime and Delinquency 46:542-563, 2000.
31. Griffin PA, Steadman HJ, Petrila J: The use of criminal charges and sanctions in mental health courts. Psychiatric Services 53:1285-1289, 2002.
32. Glover R, Petrila J: Can the state mental health agency survive health care reform? Hospital and Community Psychiatry 45:911-913, 1994.
33. Geraghyt TF, Drizin SA: Foreword - The debate over the future of juvenile courts: Can we reach consensus? Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 88:1-13, 1997.
34. Bilchik S: Challenging the myths: 1999 national report series. Juvenile Justice Bulletin. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Washington DC, United States Department of Justice, 2000.
35. In re Gault, 367 US 1, 1967.
36. Kansas v: Heudricks, 521 US 346, 1997.
37. Redding RE, Frost LE: Adjudicative competence in the modern juvenile court. Virginia Journal of Social Policy and the Law 9:353-409, 2001.
38. Grisso T: The competence of adolescents as trial defendants. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 3:3-27, 1997.
39. McGaha AC, Otto RK, McClaren MD, et al: Juveniles adjudicated incompetent to proceed: A descriptive study of Florida's competence restoration program. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law 29:472-482, 2001.
40. Taylor WC: Golden v State: Should the insanity defense exist in juvenile court? Arkansas Law Review, 54:703-725, 2001.
41. Quinsey VL, Harris GT, Rice ME, et al: Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association, 1998.
42. Huot S, The referral process, in The Sexual Predator: Law, Policy, Evaluation, and Treatment. Edited by Schlank A, Cohen F, Kingston NY, Civic Research Institute, 1999.
43. Hanson RK. What do we know about sex offender risk assessment? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 4:50-72, 1998.
44. Washington v. Strauss, 20 P. 3d 1022, 2001.
45. Petrila J, Otto RK. Admissibility of expert testimony in sexually violent predator proceedings, in The Sexual Predator: Legal Issues, Clinical Issues, Special Populations, vol. 2. Edited by Schlank A, Kingston NY, Civic Research Institute, 2001.
46. Wilson JJ. OJJDP Fact Sheet, November 2000, No. 18. Office of Justice Programs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. Washington, DC, United States Department of Justice.
47. Macallair D. Emerging from darkness: Reinventing San Francisco's juvenile justice system. Stanford Law and Policy Review 7:31-39, 1995-1996.
48. Butterfield A. Hard time: A special report: Profits at a juvenile prison come with a chilling cost. New York Times July 15, 1998, Section A, p. 1.
49. Dale MJ. Lawsuits and public policy: The role of litigation in correcting conditions in juvenile detention centers. University of San Francisco Law Review 32:675-733, 1998.
50. Comment: Jimmy Ryce involuntary civil commitment for sexually violent predators' treatment and care act: Replacing criminal justice with civil commitment. Florida State University Law Review 26:487:516, 1999.
51. Walker JC, Freedom is to confinement as twilight is to dusk: The unfortunate logic of sexual predator statutes. University of Missouri Law Review 67:993-1017, 2002.
52. Kanas v. Crane, 534 US 407, 2002.
53. Research Preview: Reintegrating juvenile offenders into the community: OJJDP's intensive community-based aftercare demonstration program. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice. Washington, DC, United States Department of Justice, December, 1998.
54. Henggler SW, Borduin CM, Schoenwald SK, et al: Multisystemic treatment of anti-social behavior in children and adolescents. New York, Guilford, 1998.
55. Schlank A, Bidelman P: Transition - Challenges for the offender and the community, in The Sexual Predator: Legal Issues, Clinical Issues, Special Populations. Edited by Schlank A, Kingston NY, Civic Research Institute, 2001.
56. Petrila J. From constitution to contracts: Mental disability law at the turn of the century, The Evolution of Mental Health Law. Edited by Frost L, Bonnie, R, Washington DC: American Psychological Association, 2001.
57. Tyler TR. The psychological consequences of judicial processes: Implications for civil commitment hearings. Southern Methodist Law Review 46:433-445, 1992.
58. Gardner W, Hoge SK, Bennett N, et al: Two scales for measuring patients' perceptions of coercion during mental hospital admission. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 11:307-321, 1993.
59. Lidz C, Hoge S, Gardner W, et al: Perceived coercion in mental hospital admissions: Pressures and process. Archives of General Psychiatry 52:1034-1039, 1995.
60. Ridgely MS, Borum R, Petrila J: The effectiveness of involuntary outpatient treatment: Empirical evidence and the experience of eight states. Santa Monica CA, RAND Institute for Civil Justice, 2001.
61. Monahan J, Bonnie R, Appelbaum P, et al: Mandated community treatment: Beyond outpatient commitment. Psychiatric Services 52:1198-1205, 2001.
62. Swanson J, Swartz M, Hannon M, et al: Psychiatric advance directives: A survey of persons with schizophrenia, family members, and treatment providers. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 2:73-86, 2003.
63. Swartz MS, Swansou JW, Hiday VA, et al: A randomized controlled trial of outpatient commitment in North Carolina. Psychiatric Services 52:325-329, 2001.
64. Steadman HJ, Gounis K, Dennis D, et al: Assessing the New York City involuntary outpatient commitment pilot program. Psychiatric Services 52:330-336, 2001.
65. Trupin E, Richards H. Seattle's mental health courts: Early indicators of effectiveness. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 26:33-53, 2003.
66. Mcgaha A, Boothroyd, RA, Poythress NG, et al: Lessons from the Broward county mental health court evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning 25:125-135, 2002.
67. Petrila J, Monahan J. An introduction to the special issue on mandated community treatment. Behavioral Sciences and the Law in press.
68. Anthony W. Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 2nd ed. Boston MA, Boston University Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 2001.