The effect of mild hearing impairment on auditory processing tests

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 6-16

  Neijenhuis, Karin ^a   Tschur, Hans ^b   Snik, Ad ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Diagnostic Centre Eindhoven   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Adults; Auditory processing disorders; Presentation level; Sensorineural hearing loss

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DICHOTIC LISTENING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION DEAFNESS; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY;

ADULT; AGED; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDIOMETRY, SPEECH; AUDITORY PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DICHOTIC LISTENING TESTS; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTUAL MASKING;

EID: 2542428594     PISSN: 10500545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.15.1.3     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ASHA. (1996). Central auditory processing: Current research and implications for clinical practice. Am J Audiol 5:41-54.
2. Baker RJ, Rosen S. (2002). Auditory Filter nonlinearity in mild/moderate hearing impairment. J Acoust Soc Am 111:1330-1339.
3. Bamford J, Saunders E. (1991). Auditory perception in sensorineural hearing loss. In: Hearing Impairment, Auditory Perception and Language Disability. London: Whurr Publishers, 82-117.
4. Bellis TJ. (1996). Assessment and Management of Central Auditory Processing Disorders in the Educational Setting: From Science to Practice. San Diego: Singular Publishing.
5. Bornstein SP, Wilson RH, Cambron NK. (1994). Low- and high-pass filtered Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6 for monaural and binaural evaluation. J Amer Acad Audiol 5:259-264.
6. Bosman AJ. (1989). Speech Perception by the Hearing Impaired. Utrecht: University of Utrecht.
7. Bosman AJ, Smoorenburg GF. (1992). Woordenlijst voor spraakaudiometrie. Electro Medical Instruments bv and Veenhuis Medical Audio bv, Gouda, the Netherlands. Compact disc.
8. Chermak GD, Musiek FE. (1997). Central Auditory Processing Disorders; New Perspectives. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.
9. Fifer RC, Jerger JF, Berlin CI, Tobey EA, Campbell JC. (1983). Development of a dichotic sentence identification test for hearing-impaired adults. Ear Hear 4:300-305.
10. Jerger J, Musiek F. (2000). Report of the consensus conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders in school-aged children. J Am Acad Audiol 11:467-474.
11. Keith RW (2000). Development and standardization of scan-c test for auditory processing disorders in children. J Am Acad Audiol 11:438-445.
12. Kimura D. (1961). Some effects of temporal lobe damage on auditory perception. Can J Psychol 15:156-165.
13. Matzker J. (1959). Two new methods for the assessment of central auditory functions in case of brain disease. Ann ORL 68:1185-1197.
14. Max L. (1995). Betrouwbaarheid van een neder-landstalige dichotische luistertest met cijfers. Tijdschrift voor Stem-Spraak- en Taalpathologie 4:115-131.
15. Max L, D'Haese P. (1994). Digitale realisatie van een nederlandstalige dichotische luistertest met cijfers. Tijdschrift voor logopedie en audiologie 24:36-41.
16. Miltenherger G, Dawson G, Raica A. (1978). Central auditory testing with peripheral hearing loss. Arch Otolaryngol 104:11-15.
17. Moore BC. (1996). Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids. Ear Hear 17:133-161.
18. Musiek FE. (1994). Frequency (pitch) and duration pattern tests. J Am Acad Audiol 5:265-268.
19. Musiek FE. (1999). Central auditory tests. Scand Audiol 28(suppl. 51):33-46.
20. Musiek FE, Baran JA, Pinheiro ML. (1990). Duration pattern recognition in normal subjects and patients with cerebral and cochlear lesions. Audiology 29:304-313.
21. Musiek FE, Lamb L. (1994). Central auditory assessment: An overview. In: Katz J, ed. Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 197-211.
22. Musiek FE, Pinheiro ML. (1987). Frequency patterns in cochlear, brainstem, and cerebral lesions. Audiology 26:79-88.
23. Needleman AR, Crandell CC. (1995). Speech recognition in noise by hearing-impaired and noise-masked normal-hearing listeners. J Am Acad Audiol 6:414-424.
24. Neijenhuis KA, Snik A, van den Brook P. (in press). Auditory processing disorders in adults and children;. evaluation of a test battery. Int J Audiol.
25. Neijenhuis KA, Stollman MH, Snik AF, Van den Broek P. (2001). Development of a central auditory test battery for adults. Audiology 40:69-77.
26. Noffsinger D, Wilson RH, Musiek FE. (1994). Department of veterans affairs compact disc recording for auditory perceptual assessment: background and introduction. J Am Acad Audiol 5:231-235.
27. Pinheiro ML, Ptacek PH. (1971). Reversals in the perception of noise and tone patterns. J Acoust Soc Amer 49:1778-1783.
28. Plomp R, Mimpen AM. (1979). Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology 18:43-52.
29. Plyler PN, Hedrick MS.(2002). Effects of stimulus presentation level on stop consonant identification in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Amer Acad Audiol 13:154-159.
30. Schwartz DM, Lyregaard PE, Lundh P. (1988). Hearing aid selection for severe-to-profound hearing loss. Hear J 41:13-17.
31. Speaks C, Niccum N, Van Tasell D. (1985). Effects of stimulus material on the dichotic listening performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss. J Sp Hear Res 28:16-25.
32. Stuart A, Phillips DP. (1998). Recognition of temporally distorted words by listeners with and without a simulated hearing loss. J Am Acad Audiol 9:199-208.