An approach to phenotypic analysis and environmental variability. The examples of the genera Dianthus L. and Lotus L. in the north of Portugal

Acta Botanica Croatica

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 35-48

  Crespi, Antonio L ^a   Bernardos, Sonia ^b   Paiva, Jorge ^c   Amich, Francisco ^b   Fernandes, Claudia P ^a   Castro, Adriano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRÁS OS MONTES AND ALTO DOURO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALAMANCA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Dianthus; Lotus; Phenotypic analysis; Portugal; Variability

Indexed keywords

DIANTHUS; DIANTHUS CARYOPHYLLUS; LOTUS;

EID: 2542424694     PISSN: 03650588     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. BALL P. W., 1968: Lotus L. In: TUTIN, T. G., HEYWOOD, V. H., BURGES, N. A., MOORE, D. M., VALENTINE, D. H., Walters, S. M., WEBB, D. A. (eds.), Flora Europaea 2, 173-176. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
2. BERNAL M., LAÍNZ M., MUÑOZ GARMENDIA F., 1990: Dianthus L. In: CASTROVIEJO, S., LAÍNZ, M., LÓPEZ GONZÁLEZ, G., MONTSERRAT, P., MUÑOZ GARMENDIA, F., PAIVA, J., VILLAR, L. (eds.). Flora Iberica 2, 426-462. Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC. Madrid.
3. BILLINGS W. D., 1952: The environmental complex in relation to plant growth and distribution. Quart. Rev. Biol. 27, 251-265.
4. BOLÒS O., VIGO J., 1984: Dianthus L. In: Flora del països catalans. 2, 750-761. Ed. Barcino. Barcelona.
5. BOLÒS O., VIGO J., 1990: Lotus L. In: Flora del països catalans. 1, 612-620. Ed. Barcino. Barcelona.
6. BRADSHAW A. D., 1965: Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Adv. Genetics 13, 115-155.
7. BRADSHAW A. D., 1972: Some of the evolutionary consequences of being a plant. Evol. Biol. 5, 25-47.
8. CONSTANCE L., 1953: Notes and comment. The role of plant ecology in biosystematics. Ecology 34, 642-649.
9. COUTINHO A. X. P., 1939: Flora de Portugal. J. Cramer. Leterhausen.
10. CRESPÍ A. L., 1999: Análisis morfoecológico en el género Dianthus L. PhD Thesis. University of Salamanca, Spain.
11. CRESPÍ A. L., MORGADO V., ABREU A., PEREIRA A., RIBEIRO J. A., AMICH F., PAIVA J., 2000: Contribución al conocimiento del género Lotus L. en el Norte de Portugal. I. Diversidad taxonómica y distribución. Lagascalia 21, 279-287.
12. CRESPÍ A. L., PEREIRA A., FERNANDES C. P., CORTES R., OLIVEIRA S., RIBEIRO J. A. 2001: Descripción de la estructura vegetal de comunidades riparias del Noroeste de Portugal. Bol. Real Soc. Esp. de Hist. Nat., in press.
13. DAVIDSON J. F., 1952: Notes and comments. The use of taxonomy in ecology. Ecology 33, 297-299.
14. DUNCAN T., BAUM B. R., 1981: Numerical phenetics: its uses in botanical systematics. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12, 387-404.
15. FARRIS J. S., 1966: Estimation of conservatism of characters by constancy within biological populations. Evolution 20, 587-591.
16. FELSENSTEIN J., 1988: Phylogenies and quantitative characters. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19, 445-471.
17. FRANCO J. A., 1971: Nova flora de Portugal, 1. FRANCO, J. A. ed., Lisboa.
18. GALLEGO M. J., 1987: Dianthus L. In: VALDÉS, B., TALAVERA, S., FERNÁNDEZ-GALIANO, E. (eds.), Flora vascular de Andalucía Occidental 1, 271-274. Ketres, Barcelona.
19. GUINOCHET M., 1977: Quelques aspects actuels de la Systématique. Bull. Soc. Bot. Fr. 124, 543-596.
20. HAGEN J. B., 1983: The development of experimental methods in plant taxonomy, 1920-1950. Taxon 32, 406-416.
21. HAIR J. F. Jr., ANDERSON R. E., TATHAM R. L., BLACK W. C., 1995: Multivariate data. Analysis with readings. Prentice Hall International, New Jersey.
22. HEDRICK P. W., GINEVAN M. E., EWING E. P., 1976: Genetic polymorphism in heterogeneous environments. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7, 1-32.
23. HESLOP-HARRISON J., 1964: Firty years of genecology. Adv. Ecol. Res. 2, 159-247.
24. HEYWOOD V. H., 1973: Taxonomy and ecology. The systematics association, 5. Academic Press, London.
25. HILL R. S., 1980: A numerical taxonomic approach to the study of angiosperm leaves. Bot. Gaz. 141, 213-229.
26. KAPLAN D. R., 2001: The science of plant morphology: definition, history, and role in modern biology. Am. J. Bot. 88, 1711-1741.
27. LUBISCHEW A. A., 1963: On some contradictions in general taxonomy and evolution. Evolution 17, 414-430.
28. MAJOR J., 1958: Notes and comment. Plant ecology as a branch of botany. Ecology 39, 392-303.
29. NICOLSON M., 1990: Henry Allan Gleason and the individualistic hypothesis: the structure of a botanist's career. Bot. Rev. 56, 91-161.
30. RAVEN P. H., 1974: Plant systematics 1947-1972. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 61, 166-178.
31. RICHARDS O. W., 1939: The use of ecological data in taxonomy. J. Ecol. 27, 406-407.
32. ROZEIRA A., 1944: A flora da província de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro. Mem. Soc. Brot. 3, 1-203.
33. RUÍZ de CLAVIJO E., 1987: Lotus L. In: VALDÉS, B., TALAVERA, S., FERNÁNDEZ-GALIANO, E. (eds.). Flora Vascular de Andalucía Occidental 2, 72-78. Ed. Ketres. Barcelona.
34. SAMPAIO G., 1988: Flora portuguesa. Américo Pires de Lima (ed.), 3ě edição (facsimil). Porto.
35. SCHEINER S. M., 1993: Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24, 35-68.
36. SCHLICHTING C. D., 1986: The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17, 667-693.
37. SCHMALHAUSEN I. I., 1960: Evolution and cybernetics. Evolution 14, 509-524.
38. SOKAL R. R., SNEATH P. H., 1963: Principles of numerical taxonomy. W. H. Freeman and Co. San Francisco.
39. SOKAL R. R., 1986: Phenetic taxonomy: theory and methods. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17, 423-442.
40. STONE L., EZRATI S., 1996: Chaos, cycles and spatio temporal dynamics in plant ecology. J. Ecol. 84, 279-291.
41. SULTAN S. E., 1987: Evolutionary implications of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Evol. Biol. 21, 127-178.
42. THIÉBAUT M., 2000: A foliar morphometric approach to the study of Salicaceae. Bot. Rev. 66, 423-439
43. TURESSON G., 1922: The genotypical response of the plant species to the habitat. Hereditas 3, 210-350.
44. TUTIN T. G., WALTERS S. M., 1993: Dianthus L. In: TUTIN, T. G., BURGES, N. A., CHARTER, A. O., EDMONSON, J. R., HEYWOOD, V. H., MOORE, D. M., VALENTINE, D. H., WALTERS, S. M., WEBB, D. A. (ed.). Flora Europaea 1: 227-246. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
45. VALDÉS B., 2000: Lotus L. In: TALAVERA, S., AEDO, C., CASTROVIEJO, S., HERRERO, A., ROMERO ZARCO, C., SALGUEIRO, F. J., VELAYOS, M. (ed.). Flora Iberica 7, 776-812. Real Jardín Botánico, CSIC. Madrid.
46. VAN VALEN L., 1976: Ecological species, multispecies, and oaks. Taxon 25, 233-239.
47. WAITT D. E., LEVIN D. A., 1993: Phenotypic integration and plastic correlations in Phlox drummondii (Polemoniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 80, 1224-1233.
48. WCISLO W. T., 1989: Behavioral environments and evolutionary change. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20, 137-169.
49. WEST-EBERHARD M. J., 1989: Phenotypic plasticity and the origins of diversity. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20, 249-278.
50. WILLKOM, M., LANGE J., 1880: Prodomus Florae Hispanicae. Vol. 3. Stuttgartiae.