Theory of insulator metal transition and colossal magnetoresistance in doped manganites

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 92, Issue 15, 2004, Pages

  Ramakrishnan, T V ^a,b   Krishnamurthy, H R ^a,b   Hassan, S R ^a,b   Pai, G Venketeswara ^a,c  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

^b JAWAHARLAL NEHRU CENTRE FOR ADVANCED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH   (India)

^c ABDUS SALAM INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR THEORETICAL PHYSICS   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANNEALING; BAND STRUCTURE; CHEMICAL BONDS; COLOSSAL MAGNETORESISTANCE; DOPING (ADDITIVES); HAMILTONIANS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; METAL INSULATOR TRANSITION; PEROVSKITE; PHONONS; POTENTIAL ENERGY;

DENSITY OF STATES (DOS); LATTICE DISTORTIONS; PAULI MATRICES; PHONON COUPLINGS;

MAGNETIC MATERIALS;

EID: 2542419418     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.157203     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. For reviews, see Colossal Magnetoresistance Oxides, edited by Y. Tokura (Gordon and Breach, New York, 2000); M. B. Salamon and M. Jaime, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 583 (2001).
2. For reviews, see Colossal Magnetoresistance Oxides, edited by Y. Tokura (Gordon and Breach, New York, 2000); M. B. Salamon and M. Jaime, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 583 (2001).
3. For example, E. Dagotto, Nanoscale Phase Separation in Manganites (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 2002).
4. N. A. Babushkina et al., Nature (London) 391, 159 (1998). Approaches based on static lattice displacements or band structure [4] cannot account for such phenomena.
5. See, e.g., D.D. Sarma et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1126 (1995); S. Satpathy, Z.S. Popovic, and F.R. Vukajlovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 960 (1996).
6. See, e.g., D.D. Sarma et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1126 (1995); S. Satpathy, Z.S. Popovic, and F.R. Vukajlovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 960 (1996).
7. For example, N. Furukawa, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 64, 2734 (1995).
8. A. J. Millis, B. I. Shraiman, and R. Mueller, Phys. Rev. B 54, 5389 (1996); A.J. Millis, R. Mueller, and B.I. Shraiman, Phys. Rev. B 54, 5405 (1996).
9. A. J. Millis, B. I. Shraiman, and R. Mueller, Phys. Rev. B 54, 5389 (1996); A.J. Millis, R. Mueller, and B.I. Shraiman, Phys. Rev. B 54, 5405 (1996).
10. K. Huang and F. Rhys, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 204, 406 (1950).
11. Nevertheless, as the ℓ states are polaronic, and external perturbations couple to electrons, there are no spectroscopic (or thermodynamic) sharp level manifestations [9]
12. Details and other results will be presented elsewhere (e.g., see cond-mat/0308396 and cond-mat/0309493)
13. ℓ), and is the only relevant band for low energy physics [9].
14. M.S. Laad, L. Craco, and E. Muller-Hartmann, Phys. Rev. B 63, 214419 (2001).
15. For example, D. Louca et al., Phys. Rev. B 56, R8475 (1997); C. Meneghini et al., J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14, 1967 (2002).
16. For example, D. Louca et al., Phys. Rev. B 56, R8475 (1997); C. Meneghini et al., J. Phys. Condens. Matter 14, 1967 (2002).
17. H limit we treat.
18. F as an adjustable fitting parameter.
19. G.I. Lang and A.Yu. Firsov, Sov. Phys. JETP 16, 1301 (1963).
20. A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozenberg, Rev. Mod Phys. 68, 13 (1996).
21. L. M. Falicov and J. C. Kimball, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 997 (1969).
22. The results are nearly the same for semicircular and realistic tight binding DOS (e.g., see Fig. 2 for resistivity).
23. G.J. Snyder et al., Phys. Rev. B 53, 14434 (1996).
24. Y. Okimoto et al., Phys. Rev. B 55, 4206 (1997).
25. The discrepancies can be reduced by including short-range correlations neglected in the DMFT.
26. K. Khazeni et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 295 (1996).
27. H.Y. Hwang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 914 (1995).
28. G. M. Zhao et al., Phys. Rev. B 63, 060402 (2001).