Phonological underspecification and mapping mechanisms in the speech recognition lexicon

Brain and Language

Volumn 90, Issue 1-3, 2004, Pages 401-412

  Wheeldon, Linda ^a   Waksler, Rachelle ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LANGUAGE; MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; PHONETICS; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

HUMANS; LINGUISTICS; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 2542418870     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00451-6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Archangeli D. Aspects of underspecification theory. Phonology. 5:1988;183-207
2. Coenen, Zwiterlood, Bölte Variations and assimilation in German: Consequences for lexical access and representation. Language and Cognitive Processes. 16:2001;535-564
3. Connine, Blasko, Titone Do the beginnings of spoken words have special status in auditory word recognition? Journal of Memory and Language. 32:1993;193-210
4. Fitzpatrick J., Wheeldon L.R. Phonology and phonetics in psycholinguistic models of speech perception. Burton-Roberts N., Carr P., Docherty G. Phonological knowledge: Conceptual and empirical issues. 1999;Oxford University Press
5. Gaskell G., Marslen-Wilson W. Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 22.1:1996;144-158
6. Gaskell G., Marslen-Wilson W. Mechanisms of phonological inference in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 24.2:1998;380-396
7. Inkelas, S. (1994). Archiphonemic underspecification: An optimization approach to the phonological description of morphemes. Manuscript, University of California, Berkeley
8. Ito J., Mester A., Padgett J. Licensing and underspecification in optimality theory. Linguistic Inquiry. 26.4:1995;571-613
9. Kiparsky P. From cyclic to lexical phonology. van der Hulst H. The structure of phonological representation. 1982;Foris, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
10. Kiparsky P. Some consequences of lexical phonology. Phonology Yearbook. 2:1985;82-138
11. Kiparsky P. Blocking in nonderived environments. Hargus S., Kaisse E. Phonetics and phonology. 1993;277-314 Academic Press, New York
12. Klatt D.H. The problem of variability in speech recognition and in models of speech perception. Perkell J., Klatt D. Invarience and variability in speech processes. 1986;300-319 Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
13. Lahiri, A. (1999). Speech recognition with phonological features. Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, San Francisco. Vol. 1. 715-718
14. Lahiri A. Phonology: Structure, representation and process. Wheeldon L. Aspects of language production. 2000;165-225 Psychology Press, London
15. Lahiri A., Marslen-Wilson W. The mental representation of lexical form: A phonological approach to the recognition lexicon. Cognition. 38:1991;245-294
16. Lahiri, A., van Coillie, S. (1999). Non-mismatching features in language comprehension. Manuscript, University of Konstanz
17. Marslen-Wilson W. Issues of process and representation in lexical access. Altmann G., Shillcock R. Cognitive models of speech processing: The second sperlonga meeting. 1993;187-210 Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Ltd, Hove, UK
18. Marslen-Wilson W.D., Gaskell G. Match and mismatch in lexical access [abstract]. International Journal of Psychology. 27(3):1992;61
19. Marslen-Wilson W.D., Moss H.E., Van Halen S. Perceptual distance and competition in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 22:1996;1376-1392
20. Marslen-Wilson W., Zwitserlood P. Accessing spoken words: The importance of word onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 15:1989;576-585
21. McClelland J.L., Elman J.L. The TRACE Model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology. 18:1986;1-86
22. Pisoni D.B. Some thoughts on normalisation in speech production. Johnson K., Mullennix J.W. Talker variability in speech processing. 1997;9-32 Academic Press, San Diego, CA
23. Reetz, H. (1998). Automatic speech recognition with features. Habilitationsschrift, Universität des Saarlandes
24. Reetz, H. (1999). Converting speech signals to phonological features. Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetics Sciences (ICPhS 99), San Francisco, CA. Vol. 3, 1733-1736
25. Reetz, H., Lahiri, A. (2001). Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Francisco, CA
26. Steriade D. Underspecification and markedness. John G. The handbook of phonological theory. 1995;114-174 Blackwell, Cambridge