Rings, things, and cages: Still the measure of last resort?

Orthopedics

Volumn 28, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 973-974

  Berry, Daniel J ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETABULUM; ARTICLE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; BONE DEFECT; BONE SCREW; FRACTURE FIXATION; HUMAN; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 25144518375     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-20050901-30     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Berry DJ, Muller ME. Revision arthroplasty using an anti-protrusio cage for massive acetabular bone deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992; 74:711-715.
2. Rosson J, Schatzker J. The use of reinforcement rings to reconstruct deficient acetabula. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992; 74:716-720.
3. Cooney IV WP, Berry DJ, Hoxie SC, Hanssen AD. Burch-Schneider cage for revision total hip arthroplasty with massive acetabular bone loss: results and complications. Paper presented at American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting; February 23-27, 2005; Washington DC.
4. Böhm P, Banzhaf S. Acetabular revision with allograft bone: 103 revisions with 3 reconstruction alternatives, followed for 0.3-13 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1999; 70:240-249.
5. Gill TJ, Sledge JB, Muller ME. The Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage in revision total hip arthroplasty: Indications, principles, and long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80:946-953.
6. Perka C, Ludwig R. Reconstruction of segmental defects during revision procedures of the acetabulum with the Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage. J Arthroplasty. 2001; 16:568-574.
7. Peters CL, Curtain M, Samuelson KM. Acetabular revision with the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage and cancellous allograft bone. J Arthroplasty. 1995; 10:307-312.
8. Rosson J, Schatzker J. The use of reinforcement rings to reconstruct deficient acetabula. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992; 74:716-720.
9. Schatzker J, Wong MK. Acetabular revision: The role of rings and cages. Clin Orthop. 1999; 369:187-197.
10. Udomkiat P, Dorr LD, Won YY, Longjohn D, Wan Z. Technical factors for success with metal ring acetabular reconstruction. J Arthroplasty. 2001; 16:961-969.
11. van der Linde M, Tonino A. Acetabular revision with impacted grafting and a reinforcement ring: 42 patients followed for a mean of 10 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001; 72:221-227.
12. Wachtl SW, Jung M, Jakob RP, Gautier E. The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in acetabular revision surgery: a mean follow-up of 12 years. J Arthroplasty. 2000; 15:959-963.
13. Winter E, Piert M, Volkmann R, et al. Allogeneic cancellous bone graft and a Burch-Schneider ring for acetabular reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83:862-867.