On building a unified system of accreditation in teacher education

Journal of Teacher Education

Volumn 56, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 307-317

  Murray, Frank B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Accreditation; NCATE; TEAC; Teacher education

Indexed keywords

EID: 25144517796     PISSN: 00224871     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022487105279842     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Archbald, D. (1998). The reviews of state content standards in English language arts and mathematics: A summary and review of their methods and findings and implications for future standards development. Unpublished report for the National Education Goals Panel.
2. Ballou, D., & Podgursky, M. (1999). Teacher training and licensure: A layman's guide. In M. Kanstoroom & C. Finn (Eds.), Better teachers, better schools (pp. 31-82). Washington, DC: Thomas Fordham Foundation.
3. Carini, R., & Kuh, G. (2002, February). What can we learn about the next generation of teachers from student engagement patterns in college? Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Teacher Education Accreditation Council, New York.
4. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teaching for America's future: National commissions and vested interests in an almost profession. Educational Policy, 14(1), 162-183.
5. Dill, D., Massy, W., Williams, P., & Cook, C. (1996, September/October). Accreditation and academic quality assurance: Can we get there from here? Change Magazine, pp. 17-24.
6. Ewell, P. (2001) Piloting a new approach to accreditation in teacher education: An evaluation of the TEAC/FIPSE project. Boulder, CO: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.
7. Gideonse, H. (1998). Two accrediting agencies? ATE News-letter, 31(5), 4.
8. Gitomer, D., Latham, A., & Ziomek, R. (1999). The academic quality of prospective teachers: The impact of admissions and licensure testing. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
9. Graham, P., Lyman, R., & Trow, M. (1995). Accountability of colleges and universities: An essay. New York: Columbia University Press.
10. Meier, D. (1999). Educating a democracy: Standards and the future of public education. Boston Review, December 1999 and January 2000, Vol. 24. Available from http://www.bostonreview.mit.edu
11. Mitchell, R., & Barth, P. (1999). How teacher licensing tests fall short. Thinking K-16, 3(1), 3-23.
12. Murray, F. (2003). Accreditors in teaching now have equal footing. Education Week, 23(9), 34-35.
13. National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching for America's future. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
14. Noddings, N. (1999). Caring and competence. In G. Griffin (Ed.), The education of teachers (pp. 205-220). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Ohanian, S. (1999). One size fits few: The folly of educational standards. New York: Heinemann.
16. Ohanian, S. (2000). Goals 200: What's in a name? Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 345-355.
17. Teacher Education Accreditation Council. (1999). Prospectus. Washington, DC: Author.
18. Trow, M. (1998). On the accountability of higher education in the United States. In W. Bowen & H. Shapiro (Eds.), Universities and their leadership (pp. 15-61). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19. Wenglinsky, H. (2000). Teaching the teachers: Different settings, different results. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service Policy Information Center. Also available at http://www.ets.org/research/pic