The differential risk of retaliation by relational distance: A more general model of violent victimization

Criminology

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 697-730

  Dugan, Laura ^a   Apel, Robert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Rational choice; Relational distance; Routine activities; Violent victimization

Indexed keywords

EID: 25144515010     PISSN: 00111384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0011-1348.2005.00021.x     Document Type: Review

References (55)

1. Avakame, Edem F. 1998 How different is violence in the home? An examination of some correlates of stranger and intimate homicide. Criminology 36: 601-632.
2. Bachman, Ronet and Bruce Taylor 1994 The measurement of family violence and rape by the redesigned national crime victimization survey. Justice Quarterly 11: 701-714.
3. Bachman, Ronet, Raymond Paternoster and Sally Ward 1992 The rationality of sexual offending: Testing a deterrence/ rational choice conception of sexual assault. Law and Society Review 26: 343-372.
4. Belknap, Joanne 1987 Routine activity theory and the risk of rape: Analyzing ten years of National Crime Survey data. Criminal Justice Policy Review 2: 337-356.
5. Biderman, Albert D. and David Cantor 1984 A longitudinal analysis of bounding, respondent conditioning, and mobility as sources of panel bias in the National Crime Survey. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Statistical Association, Philadelphia, PA (Summer 1984).
6. Campbell, Jacquelyn C., Daniel Webster, Jane Koziol-McLain, Carolyn Rebecca Block, Doris Campbell, Mary Ann Curry, Faye Gary, Judith McFarlane, Carolyn Sachs, Phyllis Sharps, Yvonne Ulrich and Susan A. Wilt 2003 Assessing risk factors for intimate partner homicide. National Institute of Justice Journal 250: 14-19.
7. Cohen, Lawrence E. and Marcus Felson 1979 Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review 44: 588-608.
8. Cohen, Lawrence E., James R. Kluegel and Kenneth C. Land 1981 Social inequality and predatory criminal victimization: An exposition and test of a formal theory. American Sociological Review 46: 505-524.
9. Cornish, Derek B. and Ronald V. Clarke 1985 Modeling offenders' decisions: A framework for research and policy. In Michael Tonry and Norval Morris (eds.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 6. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10. 1986 The Reasoning Criminal. New York: Springer-Verlag.
11. Dobash, R. Emerson and Russell P. Dobash 1984 The nature and antecedents of violent events. British Journal of Criminology 24: 269-288.
12. Dugan, Laura, Daniel S. Nagin and Richard Rosenfeld 2003 Exposure reduction or retaliation? The effects of domestic violence resources on intimate-partner homicide. Law and Society Review 37:169-198.
13. Fantuzzo, John W., Laura M. DePaola, Leslie Lambert, Tamara Martino, Genevie Anderson and Sara Sutton 1991 Effects of interparental violence on the psychological adjustment and competencies of young children. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology 59: 258-265.
14. Felson, Marcus 1986 Linking criminal choices, routine activities, informal social control, and criminal outcomes. In Derek B. Cornish and Ronald V. Clarke (eds.), The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending. New York: Springer-Verlag.
15. Felson, Richard B. 1993 Predatory and dispute-related violence: A social interactionist approach. In Ronald V. Clarke and Richard B. Felson (eds.), Routine Activity and Rational Choice. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
16. Fergusson, David M. and L. John Horwood 1998 Exposure to interparental violence in childhood and psychosocial adjustment in young adulthood. Child Abuse and Neglect 22: 339-357.
17. Gottfredson, Michael R. 1981 On the etiology of criminal victimization. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 72: 714-726.
18. Grasmick, Harold G. and Robert J. Bursik Jr. 1990 Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model. Law and Society Review 24: 837-861.
19. Henning, Kris, Harold Leitenberg, Patricia Coffey, Tonia Turner and Robert T. Bennett 1996 Long-term psychological and social impact of witnessing physical conflict between parents. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 11: 35-51.
20. Hindelang, Michael J., Michael R. Gottfredson and James Garofalo 1978 Victims of Personal Crime. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
21. Hirschi, Travis 1969 Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
22. Jensen, Gary F. and David Brownfield 1986 Gender, lifestyles, and victimization: Beyond routine activity. Violence and Victims 1: 85-99.
23. Johnston, John 1984 Econometric Methods, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
24. Kaukinen, Catherine 2002 The help-seeking decisions of violent crime victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 17: 432-456.
25. Kennedy, Leslie W. and David R. Forde 1990 Routine activities and crime: An analysis of victimization in Canada. Criminology 28: 137-152.
26. 1999 When Push Comes to Shove: A Routine Conflict Approach to Violence. Albany: State University of New York Press.
27. Kingsnorth, Rodney F. and Randall C. MacIntosh 2004 Domestic violence: Predictors of victim support for official action. Justice Quarterly 21: 301-328.
28. Kruttschnitt, Candace 1996 Contributions of quantitative methods to the study of gender and crime, or bootstrapping our way into the theoretical thicket. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 12: 135-161.
29. Mahoney, Martha R 1991 Legal images of battered women: Redefining the issue of separation. Michigan Law Review 1: 43-49.
30. Massey, James L., Marvin D. Krohn and Lisa M. Bonati 1989 Property crime and the routine activities of individuals. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 26: 378-400.
31. Meier, Robert F., Leslie W. Kennedy and Vincent F. Sacco 2001 The Process and Structure of Crime: Criminal Events and Crime Analysis. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
32. Messner, Steven F. and Kenneth Tardiff 1987 The social ecology of urban homicide: An application of the "routine activities" approach. Criminology 23: 241-267.
33. Miethe, Terance D. and Robert F. Meier 1990 Opportunity, choice, and criminal victimization: A test of a theoretical model. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 27: 243-266.
34. 1994a Crime and its Social Context: Toward an Integrated Theory of Offenders, Victims, and Situations. Albany: State University of New York Press.
35. 1994b Understanding theories of criminal victimization. In Michael Tonry (ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 17. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Miethe, Terance D., Mark C. Stafford and J. Scott Long 1987 Social differentiation in criminal victimization: A test of routine activities/lifestyle theories. American Sociological Review 52: 184-194.
37. Mitchell, Kimberly J. and David Finkelhor 2001 Risk of crime victimization among youth exposed to domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 16: 944-964.
38. Nagin, Daniel S. and Raymond Paternoster 1993 Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law & Society Review 27: 467-496.
39. Parker, Robert Nash 1989 Poverty, subculture of violence, and type of homicide. Social Forces 67: 983-1007.
40. Paternoster, Raymond and Sally Simpson 1996 Sanction threats and appeals to morality: Testing a rational choice model of corporate crime. Law and Society Review 30: 549-583.
41. Paternoster, Raymond, Robert Brame, Paul Mazerolle and Alex Piquero 1998 Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology 36: 859-866.
42. Piliavin, Irving, Craig Thornton, Rosemary Gartner and Ross L. Matsueda 1986 Crime, deterrence, and rational choice. American Sociological Review 51: 101-119.
43. Ptacek, James 1997 The tactics and strategies of men who batter. In Albert P. Cardarelli (ed.), Violence between Intimate Partners: Patterns, Causes, and Effects. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
44. Rennison, Callie Marie and Michael Rand 2003 Criminal Victimization 2002. NCJ 199994. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.
45. Rodgers, Karen and Georgia Roberts 1995 Women's non-spousal multiple victimization: A test of the routine activities theory. Canadian Journal of Criminology 37: 363-391.
46. Sacco, Vincent F. and Leslie W. Kennedy 2002 The Criminal Event: Perspectives in Space and Time, 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
47. Sampson, Robert J. 1987 Personal violence by strangers: An extension and test of the opportunity model of predatory victimization. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 78: 327-356.
48. Sampson, Robert J. and Janet L. Lauritsen 1990 Deviant lifestyles, proximity to crime, and the offender-victim link in personal violence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 27: 110-139.
49. Sampson, Robert J. and John D. Wooldredge 1987 Linking the micro- and macro-level dimensions of lifestyle-routine activity and opportunity models of predatory victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 3: 371-393.
50. Scott, Wilbur J. and Harold G. Grasmick 1981 Deterrence and Income Tax Cheating: An Illustration of Testing Interaction Hypotheses in Utilitarian Theories. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 17: 395-409.
51. Smith, M. Dwayne and Robert Nash Parker 1980 Type of homicide and variation in regional rates. Social Forces 59: 136-147.
52. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics 2001 National Crime Victimization Survey, 1992-1999 Codebook. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
53. Williams, Kirk R. and Robert L. Flewelling 1988 The social production of criminal homicide: A comparative study of disaggregated rates in American cities. American Sociological Review 53: 421-431.
54. Wilson, Margo I. and Martin Daly 1992 Who kills whom in spouse killings? On the exceptional sex ratio of spousal homicides in the United States. Criminology 30: 189-215.
55. Worden, Alissa P. 2001 Models of Community Coordination in Partner Violence Cases: A Multi-site Comparative Analysis, Final Report. Document # 187351. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.