Analysis of the brittle fracture avoidance model for pressure vessels in European standard

International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping

Volumn 82, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 872-881

  Sandsträm, Rolf ^a   Langenberg, Peter ^b   Sieurin, Henrik ^b  

^a ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b IWT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Brittle failure; Design; Pressure vessel; Standard; Steel

Indexed keywords

BRITTLE FRACTURE; FAILURE (MECHANICAL); FRACTURE MECHANICS; FRACTURE TOUGHNESS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RESIDUAL STRESSES; STANDARDS; STEEL;

BRITTLE FAILURE; BRITTLE FRACTURE AVOIDANCE MODEL;

PRESSURE VESSELS;

BRITTLE FRACTURE; DESIGN; PRESSURE VESSEL;

EID: 25144503285     PISSN: 03080161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2005.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. G. Sanz Attempts to introduce a quantitative method of choosing steel quality with reference to the risk of brittle fracture Rev Metall CIT 77 1980 621-642
2. R. Sandström Minimum usage temperature for ferritic steels Scand J Metall 16 1987 242-252
3. CODAP: French Code for the construction of unfired pressure vessels. Part M. Appendix MAZ; 1984.
4. Swedish pressure vessel code. Stockholm: Swedish pressure vessel commission; 1987.
5. C.S. Wiesner R. Sandström S.J. Garwood D.M. Street K.J. Coulson Background to requirements for the prevention of brittle fracture in the European standards for pressure vessels (prEN 13445) and metallic industrial piping (prEN 13480)) Int J Pres Ves Pip 78 2001 391-399
6. EN 13445-2. Unfired pressure vessels - part 2-materials. Brussels: CEN; 2002.
7. K. Wallin Master curve method: A new concept for brittle fracture Int J Mater Prod Technol (Switzerland) 14 1999 342-354
8. I. Milne R.A. Ainsworth A.R. Dowling A.T. Stewart Background to and validation of CEGB report R/H/R6-revision 3 Int J Pres Ves Pip 32 1988 105-196
9. Structural Integrity Assessment Procedure (SINTAP). Final Revision, EU-project BE 95-1462. Brite-Euram programme; 1999.
10. Sedlacek G, Dahl W, Stötzel G, Liessem A. Improvement of the method given in Eurocode 3, Annex C for the choice of material to avoid brittle fracture, International Institute of Welding document IIW-DOC-X-1274-93; 1993.
11. EUROCODE 3, Design of steel structures (part 1) pr ENV 1993-1, 1998 and Design of steel bridges pr ENV 1993-2; 1999.
12. I.S. Raju J.C.J. Newman Stress-intensity factors for internal and external surface cracks in cylindrical vessels J Pres Ves Technol (Trans ASME) 104 1982 293-298
13. Metals handbook. 10th ed., vol. 19. Metals Park: ASM; 1996. p. 989.
14. I-determination; 1998.
15. R. Sandström P. Langenberg H. Sieurin New brittle fracture model for the European pressure vessel standard Int J Pres Ves Pip 81 2004 837-845
16. R. Sandström B. Ivarsson Influence of scatter in yield stresses on design stresses at elevated temperatures Mater Des 7 1986 95-100
17. J.M. Barsom S.T. Rolfe Correlations between KIc and Charpy V-notch test results in the transition-temperature range American Society for Testing and Materials STP 466 1970 p. 281-302
18. Assessment of the integrity of structures containing defects. Barnwood, Gloucester: British Energy Generation Ltd; 2001 R6-Revision 4.
19. Guidance on methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in fusion welded structures. London: British Standards Institution, BS PD6493; 1991.
20. Guide on methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in fusion welded structures. London: British Standards Institution, BS 7910; 1999.
21. A. Stacey J.Y. Barthelemy R.H. Leggatt R.A. Ainsworth Incorporation of residual stresses into the SINTAP defect assessment procedure Eng Fract Mech 67 2000 573-611
22. Smith SD. Comparison of the PD6493:1991 rho (p) factor with FEA results. TWI report SINTAP/TWI/1-2; 1997.
23. K. Wallin Methodology for selecting Charpy toughness criteria for thin high strength steels Jernkontorets forskning, report from working group 4013/89 1990
24. A. Liessem Bruchmechanische Sicherheitsanalysen von Stahlbauten aus hoch-festen niedriglegierten Stählen 1996 Shaker Verlag [Band 3/96]
25. G. Sedlacek N. Stranghöner G. Stötzel W. Dahl P. Langenberg P.A. Liessem Die Tragsicherkeit, die Ermüdungssicherheit und das Sprödbruchproblem Stahlbau 65 1996 407-414
26. N. Stranghoner G. Sedlacek G. Stotzel W. Dahl P. Langenberg The choice of steel material for steel bridges to avoid brittle fracture J Constr Steel Res (UK) 46 1998 56
27. Langenberg P, Sedlacek G, Dahl W, Feldmann M. Einsatz bruchmechanischer Sicherheitskonzepte für Sonderfälle des Stahlbaus im Bereich geschweißter Konstruktionen, AK Bruch 2002: Fortschritte in der Bruch- und Schädigungsmechanik. DVM Berichtsband 234. S.223-34.
28. Falk J. Untersuchungen zum Einfluss der Belastungsgeschwindigkeit auf das Verformungs- und Bruchverhalten an Stählen unterschiedlicher Festigkeit. PhD Thesis, Institut für Eisenhüttenkunde, RWTH Aachen; 1993.
29. Ic results Eng Fract Mech 22 1985 149-163