How surveillance begets perceptions of dishonesty: The case of the counterfactual sinner

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 89, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 117-128

  Miller, Dale T ^a,d   Visser, Penny S ^b   Staub, Brian D ^c  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Counterfactual thought; Person perception; Surveillance; Trust

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECUMBENCY; SOCIAL CONTROL; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; TRUST;

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHILD; DECEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL; SOCIAL CONTROL, FORMAL; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; TRUST;

EID: 25144499474     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.2.117     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
2. Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31, 187-276.
3. Fein, S., Hilton, J. L., & Miller, D. T. (1990). Suspicion of ulterior motivation and the correspondence bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 753-764.
4. Gilbert, D. T. (1998). Ordinary personology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 89-150). New York: McGraw-Hill.
5. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
6. Hilton, J. L., Fein, S., & Miller, D. T. (1993). Suspicion and dispositional inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 501-512.
7. Jones, E. E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: Freeman.
8. Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219-266.). New York: Academic Press.
9. Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136-153.
10. Kelley, H. H. (1971). Attribution in social interaction. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 1-26). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
11. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Miller, D. T., & Turnbull, W. (1986). Expectancies and interpersonal processes. In M. R. Rosenzweig & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 233-256). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc.
13. Olson, J. M., Roese, N. J., & Zanna, M. P. (1996). Expectancies. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 211-238). New York: Guilford Press.
14. Reeder, G. D., & Brewer, M. B. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86, 61-79.
15. Roese, N. J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 133-148.
16. Roese, N. J., & Olson, J. M. (1995). Functions of counterfactual thinking. In N. J. Roese & J. M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 169-197). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 174-221). New York: Academic Press.
18. Shackelford, T., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Betrayal in mateships, friendships and coalitions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1151-1164.
19. Strickland, L. H. (1958). Surveillance and trust. Journal of Personality, 26, 200-215.
20. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhart (Eds.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. Trope, Y. (1986). Identification and inference processes in dispositional attribution. Psychological Review, 93, 239-257.