A new threshold dose-response model including random effects for data from developmental toxicity studies

Journal of Applied Toxicology

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 435-439

  Hunt, Daniel L ^a   Rai, Shesh N ^a,b  

^a ST JUDE CHILDREN S RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Developmental toxicity study; Dose response; Random effects; Threshold

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DOSE RESPONSE; FETOTOXICITY; FETUS DEVELOPMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOXICITY TESTING;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DIETHYLHEXYL PHTHALATE; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; LOGISTIC MODELS; MICE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RANDOM ALLOCATION; TERATOGENS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 25144495239     PISSN: 0260437X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jat.1092     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Abramowitz M, Stegun IA. 1972. Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables. U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington.
2. Calabrese EJ. 2002. Hormesis: changing view of the dose-response, a personal account of the history and current status. Mutat. Res. 511: 181-189.
3. Chen JJ, Kodell RL. 1989. Quantitative risk assessment for teratological effects. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 84: 966-971.
4. Collett D. 1991. Modeling Binary Data. Chapman & Hall/CRC: London.
5. Doull J, Cattley R, Elcombe C, Lake BG, Swenberg J, Wilkinson C, Williams G, van Gemert M. 1999. A cancer risk assessment of di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate: application of the new U.S. EPA risk assessment guidelines. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 29: 327-357.
6. Haseman JK, Kupper LL. 1979. Analysis of dichotomous response data from certain toxicological experiments. Biometrics 35: 281-293.
7. Hunt D. 2002. Dose and litter allocations in the design of teratological studies to detect hormesis. Teratology 66: 309-314.
8. Hunt D, Bowman D. 2004. A parametric model for detecting hormetic effects in developmental toxicity studies. Risk Anal. 24: 65-72.
9. Hunt D, Rai S. 2003. A threshold dose-response model with random effects in teratological experiments. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 32: 1439-1457.
10. Kupper LL, Portier C, Hogan MD, Yamamoto E. 1986. The impact of litter effects on dose-response modeling in teratology. Biometrics 42: 85-98.
11. Paul SR. 1982. Analysis of proportions of affected fetuses in teratological experiments. Biometrics 38: 361-370.
12. Ryan LM. 1992. Quantitative risk assessment for developmental toxicity. Biometrics 48: 163-174.
13. Schwartz P, Gennings C, Chinchilli V. 1995. Threshold models for combination data from reproductive and developmental experiments. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90: 862-870.
14. Sielken RL, Stevenson DE. Some implications for quantitative risk assessment if hormesis exists. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 1988; 17: 259-262.
15. Tyl RW, Jones-Price C, Marr MC, Kimmel CA. 1983. Teratologic Evaluation of Diethylhexyl Phthalate (CAS No. 117-81-7) in CD-1 Mice. Final Study Report for NCTR/NTP Contract No. 222-80-2031(C), NTIS No. PB85105674. National Technical Information Service: Springfield, VA.
16. USEPA. 1996. Proposed guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment. Fed. Reg. 61: 17960-18011.
17. Williams DA. 1975. The analysis of binary responses from toxicological experiments involving reproduction and teratogenicity. Biometrics 31: 949-952.