Mathematics for All: Perspectives and Promising Practices

School Science and Mathematics

Volumn 97, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 232-241

  Hirsch, Christian R ^a   Coxford, Arthur F ^b  

^a WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 25144491220     PISSN: 00366803     EISSN: 19498594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1997.tb17268.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Begle, E. G. (1973). Some lessons learned by SMSG. Mathematics Teacher, 66, 207–214.
3. Core-Plus Mathematics Project. (1995). Linear models. Kalamazoo, MI: Western Michigan University.
4. Damarin, S. K. (1990). Teaching mathematics: A feminist perspective. In T. J. Cooney & C. R. Hirsch, (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematics in the 1990′s, 1990 yearbook (pp. 144–151). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
5. Ernst, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. Briston, PA: Falmer Press.
6. Hirsch, C. R., Coxford, A. F., Fey, J. T., & Schoen, H. L. (1995). Teaching sensible mathematics in sense-making ways with the CPMP. Mathematics Teacher, 88, 694–700.
7. Mathematical Sciences Education Board. (1990). Reshaping school mathematics: A philosophy and framework for curriculum. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
8. Meiring, S. P., Rubenstein, R. N., Schultz, J. E., de Lange, J., & Chambers, D. L. (1992). A core curriculum: Making mathematics count for everyone. Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics Addenda Series Grades 9–12. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
9. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Commission on Standards for School Mathematics (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
10. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1990). NCTM policy statement. News Bulletin, 27, 3.
11. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Commission on Teaching Standards for School Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
12. National Research Council. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
13. Secada, W. G. (1991). Agenda setting, enlightened self-interest, and equity in mathematics education. Peabody Journal of Education, 66, 22–56.
14. Secada, W. G. (1992). Race, ethnicity, social class, language, and achievement in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws, (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 623–660). New York: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
15. Stiff, L. V. (1990). African-American students are the promise of the curriculum and evaluation standards. In T. J. Cooney & C. R. Hirsch, (Eds.), Teaching and learning mathematics in the 1990′s, 1990 yearbook (pp. 152–158). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
16. Tate, W. F. (1994). Diversity, reform, and professional knowledge: The need for multicultural clarity. In D. B. Aichele & A. F. Coxford, (Eds.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics, 1994 yearbook (pp. 55–66). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
17. Tate, W. F. (1995). Mathematics communication: Creating opportunities to learn. Teaching Children Mathematics, 1, 344–349.
18. Usiskin, Z. (1985). We need another revolution in secondary school mathematics. In C. R. Hirsch & M. J. Zweng, (Eds.), The secondary school mathematics curriculum, 1985 yearbook (pp. 1–21). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.