Empowerment evaluation: Clarity, dialoque, and growth

American Journal of Evaluation

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 421-428

  Wandersman, Abraham ^a   Snell Johns, Jessica ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 25144489572     PISSN: 10982140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1098214005278774     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Cousins, B. (2005). Will the real empowerment evaluation please stand up? A critical friend perspective. In D. M. Fetterman & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation principles in practice (pp. 183-208). New York: Guilford.
2. Fetterman, D. M. (2005a). A window into the heart and soul of empowerment evaluation (Looking through the lens of empowerment evaluation principles). In D. M. Fetterman & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation principles in practice (pp. 1-26). New York: Guilford.
3. Fetterman, D. M. (2005b). In response to Drs. Patton and Scriven. American Journal of Evaluation, 26, 418-420.
4. Fetterman, D. M., & Eiler, M. (2001). Empowerment evaluation and organizational learning: A path toward mainstreaming evaluation. St Louis, MO: American Evaluation Association.
5. Fetterman, D. M., Kaftarian, S., & Wandersman, A. (1996). Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Keener, D. C., Snell-Johns, J., Livet, M., & Wandersman, A. (2005). Lessons that influenced the current conceptualization of empowerment evaluation: Reflections from two evaluation projects. In D. Fetterman and A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation principles in practice (pp. 73-91). New York: Guilford.
7. Patton, M. (2005). Toward distinguishing empowerment evaluation and placing it in a larger context: Take two. [Review of Empowerment evaluation principles in practice]. American Journal of Evaluation, 26, 408-414.
8. Sanders, J. R. (2003). Mainstreaming evaluation. In J. J. Barnette & J. R. Sanders (Eds.), The mainstreaming of evaluation: New directions for evaluation (No. 99). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Scriven, M. (2005). Review of Empowerment evaluation principles in practice. American Journal of Evaluation, 26, 415-417.
10. Snell-Johns, J., & Keener, D. C. (2000, November). The past and current evaluation capacity of two community initiatives. Paper presented as the 2000 meeting of the American Evaluation Association.
11. Wandersman, A., Keener, D. C., Snells-John, J., Miller, R., Flaspohler, P., Dye, M., et al. (2004). Empowerment evaluation: Principles and action. In L. A. Jason, C. B. Keys, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, R. R. Taylor, M. Davis, J. Durlak et al. (Eds.), Participatory community research: Theories and methods in action (pp. 139-156). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
12. Wandersman, A., Poppen, P., & Ricks, D. (1976). Humanism and behaviorism: Dialogue and growth. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
13. Wandersman, A., Snell-Johns, J., Lentz, L., Fetterman, D. M., Keener, D. C., Livet, M., et al. (2005). The principles of empowerment evaluation. In D. M. Fetterman & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation principles in practice (pp. 27-41). New York: Guilford.
14. Whitmore, E., Guijt, I., Mertens, D. M., Imm, P., Chinman, M., & Wandersman, A. (in press). Embedding improvements, lived experience and social justice in evaluation practice. In I. F. Shaw, J.C. Greene, & M. Mark (Eds.), Handbook on evaluation: Programme, policy and practice. London: Sage.