The rationale and performance of modularity in total hip arthroplasty

Orthopedics

Volumn 28, Issue 9 SUPPL., 2005, Pages

  Heim, Christine S ^a   Greenwald, A Seth ^a  

^a Lutheran Hospital Cleveland   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMIUM; COBALT; METAL; MOLYBDENUM; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); TITANIUM;

BIOMECHANICS; BONE GRAFT; CERAMICS; FEMUR MALFORMATION; HIP DISEASE; HIP DISLOCATION; HUMAN; LEG LENGTH INEQUALITY; OSTEOLYSIS; PROSTHESIS MATERIAL; REVIEW; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOMECHANICS; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN;

EID: 25144473191     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Callaghan JJ, Templeton JE, Liu SS, et al. Results of Charnley total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of thirty years. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86:690-695.
2. 2004 Hip and Knee Implant Review. Orthopedic Network News. 2004; 15:1.
3. Greenwald AS, Nelson CL. Biomechanics of the reconstructed hip. Orthop Clin North Am. 1973; 4:435-447.
4. Charles MN, Bourne RB, Davey R, Greenwald AS, Morrey BF, Rorabeck CH. Soft-tissue balancing of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86:1078-1088.
5. Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH, Vaughn BK, Drouillard P. Aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty secondary to osteolysis induced by wear debris from titanium-alloy modular femoral heads. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989; 71:1337-1342.
6. Bobyn JD, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ, Dujovne AR, Brooks CE. Concerns with modularity in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop. 1994; 298:27-36.
7. Collier JP, Surprenant BA, Jensen RE, Mayor MB. Corrosion at the interface of cobalt-alloy heads on titanium-alloy stems. Clin Orthop. 1991; 271:305-312.
8. Cook SD, Barrack RL, Baffes GC, et al. Wear and corrosion of modular interfaces in total hip replacements. Clin Orthop. 1994; 298:80-88.
9. Lieberman JR, Rimnac CM, Garvin KL, Klein RW, Salvati EA. An analysis of the head-taper interface in retrieved hip prostheses. Clin Orthop. 1994; 300:162-167.
10. D'Antonio JA, Capello WN, Manley MT, Geesink R. Hydroxyapatite femoral stems for total hip arthroplasty: 10- to 13-year follow-up. Clin Orthop. 2001; 393:101-111.
11. Engh CA, Hopper RH Jr. The odyssey of porous-coated fixation. J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17(4 Suppl 1):102-107.
12. 2004 Bone Cement Update. Orthopedic Network News. 2004; 15:16.
13. Christie MJ, DeBoer DK, Trick LW, et al. Primary total hip arthroplasty with use of the modular S-ROM prosthesis. Four to seven-year clinical and radiographic results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81:1707-1716.
14. Polando G, Postak PD, Pugh JW, Greenwald AS. A new method of fatigue testing for proximally supported femoral stems. Paper presented at: Scientific Exhibit at the 57th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1990; New Orleans, La.
15. Heim CS, Postak PD, Greenwald AS. Femoral stem fatigue characteristics of modular hip designs - Series II. Orthopaedic Transactions. 1995; 19:471-472.
16. Heim CS, Postak PD, Greenwald AS. Femoral stem fatigue characteristics of modular hip designs. In: Marlowe DE, Parr JE, Mayor MB, eds. Modularity of Orthopaedic Implants - STP 1301. Philadelphia, Pa: American Society for Testing and Materials; 1997:226-243.
17. Cameron HU. The long-term success of modular proximal fixation stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17(4 Suppl 1):138-141.
18. Crawford CH, Malkani AL, Incavo SJ, Morris HB, Krupp RJ, Baker D. Femoral component revision using an extensively hydroxyapatite-coated stem. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19:8-13.
19. McAuley JP, Engh CA Jr. Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: cylindrical and extensively coated femoral components. Clin Orthop. 2004; 429:215-221.
20. Goldberg VM. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a cementless modular femoral hip design. Am J Orthop. 2002; 31:202-204.
21. Kwong LM, Miller AJ, Lubinus P. A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 2003; 18(3 Suppl 1):94-97.
22. Murphy SB, Rodriguez J. Revision total hip arthroplasty with proximal bone loss. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19(4 Suppl 1): 115-119.