The delayed trigger voice key: An improved analogue voice key for psycholinguistic research

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 139-147

  Tyler, Michael D ^a   Tyler, Leigh ^a   Burnham, Denis K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATIC SPEECH RECOGNITION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LINGUISTICS; PHONETICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SOUND DETECTION; STATISTICS;

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; PHONETICS; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH RECOGNITION SOFTWARE;

EID: 25144472787     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206408     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. CHUTE, D. L., & WESTALL, R. F. (1996). Fifth-generation research tools: Collaborative development with PowerLaboratory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 311-314.
2. JAMES, C. (1996). A vocal response time system for use with sentence verification tasks. Behavior Research Methods. Instruments. & Computers, 28, 67-75.
3. JAMIESON, D. G., RAMJI, K., KHEIRALLAH, I., & NEARBY, T. M. (1992). CSRE: A research environment. In J. J. Ohala, T. M. Nearey, B. L. Derwing, M. M. Hodge, & G. E. Wiebe (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (pp. 1127-1130). Edmonton: University of Alberta.
4. KAPUSINSKI. D. A., & ROSENQUIST, H. S. (1973). A brief history of the voice key. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 8, 945-946.
5. KELLO, C. T., & KAWAMOTO, A. H. (1998). Runword: An IBM-PC software package for the collection and acoustic analysis of speeded naming responses. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 371-383.
6. KESSLER, B., TREIMAN, R., & MULLENNIX, J. (2002). Phonetic biases in voice key response time measurements. Journal of Memory & Language, 47, 145-171.
7. PECHMANN, T., REETZ, H., & ZERBST, D. (1989). The unreliability of voice-key measurements. Sprache & Kognition, 8, 65-71.
8. RABINER, L. R., & SAMBUR, M. R. (1975). An algorithm for determining the endpoints of isolated utterances. Bell System Technical Journal, 54, 297-315.
9. RASTLE, K., & DAVIS, M. H. (2002). On the complexities of measuring naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 307-314.
10. RASTLE, K., HARRINGTON, J., & COLTHEART, M. (2002). 358, 534 nonwords: The ARC nonword database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 1339-1362.
11. SAKUMA, N., FUSHIMI, T., & TATSUMI, I. F. (1997). Onseiha no shisatsu ni yoru kana no ondokusenji no sokutei: Ondokusenji wa gotoon no choonho ni yori okiku kotonaru [Naming latency measurements of kana based on inspection of voice waveforms: Naming latency varies greatly depending on the manner of articulation of the initial phoneme]. Shinkeishinrigaku, 13, 126-136.
12. SHERAK, R. (1982). A real-time software voice key and an application. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 14, 124-127.
13. STONE, G. O., VANHOY, M., & VAN ORDEN, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 36, 337-359.
14. TYLER, M. D. (2003). Orthography, phoneme awareness and the measurement of vocal response times. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Western Sydney.