Seventh-graders’ self-regulatory note-taking from text: Perceptions, preferences, and practices;

Reading Research and Instruction

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 1-26

  Brown, Rachel ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 25144471174     PISSN: 08860246     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19388070509558434     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aiken, E. G., Thomas, G. S., & Shennum, W. A. (1975). Memory for a lecture: Effects of notes, lecture rate, and informational density. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 439-444.
2. Alvermann, D. E. (2002). Effective literacy instruction for adolescents. Journal of Literacy Research, 34, 189-208.
3. Alvermann, D. E., & Moore, D. W. (1991). Secondary school reading. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, R B. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 951-983). New York: Longman.
4. Anderson, T. H., & Armbruster, B. B. (1984). Studying. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.) Handbook of Reading Research (pp. 657-680). New York: Longman.
5. Armbruster, B. B. (2000). Taking notes from lectures. In R. F. Flippo & D. C. Caverly, Handbook of college reading and study strategy research (pp. 175-200). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Armel, D., & Shrock, S. A. (1996). The effects of required and optional computer-based notetaking on achievement and instructional completion time. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14, 329-344.
7. Bean, T. W. (2000). Reading in the content areas: Social constructivist dimensions. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 629-644). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Bretzing, B. H., Kulhavy, R. W., & Caterino, L. C. (1987). Notetaking by junior high students. Journal of Educational Research, 80, 359-362.
9. Brown, R. (2002). Straddling two worlds: Self-directed comprehension instruction for middle schoolers. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 337-350). New York: Guilford.
10. Callow, J. (2003). Talking about visual texts with students. Retrieved April 4, 2004, from http://www.readingonline.org/articles/art_index. asp?HREF=callow/index.html
11. Caverly, D. C., Orlando, V. P., & Mullen, J. L. (2000). Textbook study reading. In R. F. Flippo & D. C. Caverly, Handbook of college reading and study strategy research (pp. 105-148). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Donahue, P., Voelkl, K. E., Campbell, J. R., & Mazzeo, J. (1999). The NAEP 1998 Reading Report Card for the Nation and the States. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, National Center for Education Statistics.
13. Duffy, G. G. (2003). Explaining reading: A resource for teaching concepts, skills and strategies. New York: Guilford.
14. Dunkeld, C. (1978). Students’ notetaking and teachers’ expectations. Journal of Reading, 21, 542-546.
15. Einstein, G. O., Morris, J., & Smith, S. (1985). Note-taking, individual differences, and memory for lecture information. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 522-532.
16. Gagne, E. D., Yekovich, C. W., & Yekovich, F. R. (1993). Cognitive psychology of school learning, (2nd Ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
17. Gamer, R., Alexander, P. A., Gillingham, M. G., & Brown, R. (1991). Interest and learning from text. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 643-659.
18. Gamer, R., Gillingham, M. G., & White, C. S. (1989). Effects of “seductive details” on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 41-57.
19. Goetz, E. T., & Sadoski, M. (1995). Commentary: The perils of seduction: Distracting details or incomprehensible abstractions? Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 500-511.
20. Goetz, J. P., & LeCompte, M. D. (1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
21. Greenleaf, C., Schoenbach, R., Cziko, C., & Mueller, F. (2001). Apprenticing adolescent readers to academic literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 71, 79-129.
22. Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2000). Strategies that work. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
23. Hidi, S., & Klaiman, R. (1983). Notetaking by experts and novices: An attempt to identify teachable strategies. Curriculum Inquiry, 13, 377-395.
24. Huffman, L. E., & Spires, H. A. (1994). Effects of explicit instruction in notetaking on sixth graders’ lecture comprehension and attitudes toward notetaking. Reading Improvement, 31, 72-76.
25. Kiewra, K. A. (1985). Investigating notetaking and review: A depth of processing alternative. Educational Psychologist, 20, 23-32.
26. Kiewra, K. A., DuBois, N. E., Christian, D., & McShane, A. (1988). Providing study notes: Comparison of three types of notes for review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 595-597.
27. Kiewra, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Christensen, M., Kim, S., & Risch, N. (1991). Effects of repetition on recall and note-taking: Strategies for learning from lectures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 120-123.
28. King, A. (1995). Cognitive strategies for learning from direct teaching. In E. Wood, V. E. Woloshyn & T. Willoughby, (Eds.), Cognitive strategy instruction for middle and high schools, (pp. 18-65) Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
29. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
30. Mason, J. (1991). Medieval realms. Essex, England: Addison Wesley Longman Limited.
31. National Center for Educational Statistics (2003). The nation’s report card. Retrieved on April 10, 2004 from http://TheNation’sReportCard:ReadingHighlights2003/nces.edu.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2003/2004452.pdf
32. National Institute for Literacy (2000). National Reading Panel report (Publication Number 00-4754). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
33. Nist, S. L., & Simpson, M. L. (2000). College studying. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 645-666). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
34. Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, M. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 317-344.
35. Peper, R. J., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). Generative effects of note-taking during science lectures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 34-38.
36. Pressley, M., Johnson, C. J., Symons, S., McGoldrick, J. A., & Kurita, J. A. (1989). Strategies that improve children’s memory and comprehension of text. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 3-32.
37. Schraw, G. (1998). Processing and recall differences among seductive details. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 3-12.
38. Strage, A., Tyler, A. B., Rohwer, W. D., & Thomas, J. W. (1987). An analytic framework for assessing distinctive course features within and across grade levels. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 12, 280-302.
39. Tovani, C. (2000). I read it, but I don’t get it. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
40. Valmont, W. J. (2003). Technology for literacy teaching and learning. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
41. van Dijk, T., & Kintsch, W. (1985). Cognitive psychology and discourse: Recalling and summarizing stories. In H. Singer & R. B. Rudell (Eds.), Theoretical Processes of Reading (3rd Ed., pp. 794-812). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
42. Van Meter, P., Yokoi, L., & Pressley, M. (1994). College students’ theory of note-taking derived from their perceptions of note-taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 323-338.
43. Wade, S. E., & Moje, E. B. (2000). The role of text in classroom learning. In M.L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 609-627). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44. Wittrock, M. C. (1990). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24, 345-376.
45. Yokoi, L. (1998). The developmental context of notetaking: A qualitative examination of secondary-level notetaking. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Albany, New York.