Implications of neutrino data circa 2005

Nuclear Physics B

Volumn 726, Issue 1-2, 2005, Pages 294-316

  Strumia, Alessandro ^a   Vissani, Francesco ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

^b LABORATORI NAZIONALI DEL GRAN SASSO   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 25144464585     PISSN: 05503213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.07.031     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. The results of the Homestake experiment are reported in: B.T. Cleveland et al. Astrophys. J. 496 1998 505
2. Latest Gallex, GNO and SAGE data have been presented in a talk by C. Cattadori at the 'Neutrino 2004' Conference (Paris, 14-19 June), web site http://neutrino2004.in2p3.fr
3. Gallex Collaboration Phys. Lett. B 447 1999 127
4. SAGE Collaboration J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 95 2002 181 astro-ph/0204245
5. Super-Kamiokande Collaboration hep-ex/0205075
6. SNO Collaboration nucl-ex/0204008
7. SNO Collaboration nucl-ex/0204009
8. SNO Collaboration nucl-ex/0502021
9. KamLAND Collaboration hep-ex/0406035
10. SuperKamiokande Collaboration hep-ex/0501064
11. MACRO Collaboration Phys. Lett. B 566 2003 35 hep-exe/0304037
12. K2K Collaboration hep-ex/0411038
13. K. Scholberg, Talk at the WIN05 Conference, Delphi, Greece
14. H.V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus A. Dietz H.L. Harney I.V. Krivosheina Mod. Phys. Lett. A 16 2001 2409 hep-ph/0201231
15. H.V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus A. Dietz I.V. Krivosheina O. Chkvorets Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 522 2004 371 hep-ph/0403018
16. LSND Collaboration Phys. Rev. D 64 2001 112007 hep-ex/0104049
17. A. Strumia F. Vissani JHEP 0111 2001 048 hep-ph/0109172
18. J.N. Bahcall S. Basu M.H. Pinsonneault Astrophys. J. 555 2001 990 astro-ph/0010346
19. LUNA Collaboration nucl-ex/0312015
20. P. Creminelli et al. JHEP 0105 2001 052 hep-ph/0102234. Its e-print version has been updated including the recent data from SNO
21. CHOOZ Collaboration hep-ex/0301017
22. A. Strumia hep-ph/0201134
23. The solar CPT-violating fit has been reemphasized in H. Murayama Phys. Lett. B 597 2004 73 hep-ph/0307127
24. A. de Gouvea C. Peña-Garay hep-ph/0406301
25. The atmospheric CPT-violating fit has been also studied by the SK Collaboration, see the talk by E. Kearns at the Neutrino 2004 Conference (Paris, 14-19 June), web site http://neutrino2004.in2p3.fr
26. See also: M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia M. Maltoni T. Schwetz Phys. Rev. D 68 2003 053007
27. A. Strumia R. Barbieri JHEP 0012 2000 016 Its e-print version, hep-ph/ 0011307, contains updates and additional discussions not present in the published version
28. S. Goswami A. Bandyopadhyay S. Choubey Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 143 2005 121 hep-ph/0409224
29. B.S. Koranga M. Narayan S. Uma Sankar hep-ph/0503092
30. See, e.g. G.L. Fogli et al. Phys. Rev. D 66 2002 093008 for an old analysis
31. J.N. Bahcall C. Peña-Garay JHEP 0311 2003 004
32. A. Bandyopadhyay S. Choubey S. Goswami S.T. Petcov hep-ph/0410283
33. For a recent extensive study see: M. Cirelli et al. Nucl. Phys. B 708 2005 215 hep-ph/0403158
34. For short summaries see A. Strumia Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 143 2005 144 hep-ph/0407132
35. M. Cirelli astro-ph/0410122
36. C. Galbiati A. Pocar D. Franco A. Ianni L. Cadonati S. Schonert hep-ph/ 0411002
37. The hypothesis that the solar energy release is dominated by CNO-cycle implies not only dramatic deviations from the solar model, but also certain SMA-like solutions compatible with pre-SK and pre-SNO data: J.N. Bahcall M. Fukugita P.I. Krastev Phys. Lett. B 374 1996 1 astro-ph/ 9602065
38. These solutions are contradicted by SK and SNO data, as found in the second addendum of [22] and in [28], that make use of the luminosity constraint of J.N. Bahcall Phys. Rev. C 65 2002 025801 hep-ph/0108148
39. J.N. Bahcall M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia C. Pena-Garay Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 2003 131301
40. For a recent summary of capabilities of neutrino beam experiments see: M. Lindner hep-ph/0503101
41. 13 = 0 it seems practically impossible to discriminate the kind of neutrino mass hierarchy with oscillation experiments, as recently discussed in: A. de Gouvea J. Jenkins B. Kayser hep-ph/0503079
42. Y. Itow et al. The JHF-Kamioka neutrino project hep-ex/0106019
43. See also: NOvA Collaboration hep-ex/0503053
44. P. Huber M. Lindner T. Schwetz W. Winter Nucl. Phys. B 665 2003 487 hep-ph/0303232
45. O.L.G. Peres A.Yu. Smirnov Nucl. Phys. B 680 2004 479 hep-ph/0309312
46. F. Feruglio A. Strumia F. Vissani Nucl. Phys. B 637 2002 345 hep-ph/ 0201291
47. F. Feruglio A. Strumia F. Vissani Nucl. Phys. B 659 2003 359 Addendum
48. C.L. Bennett et al. astro-ph/0302207
49. D.N. Spergel et al. astro-ph/0302209
50. The WMAP constraint is similar to previous analyses, e.g. A. Lewis S. Bridle Phys. Rev. D 66 2002 103511
51. Other (sometimes more conservative) analysis find similar (sometimes weaker) bounds S. Hannestad JCAP 0305 2003 004 astro-ph/0303076
52. S.W. Allen R.W. Schmidt S.L. Bridle Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 346 2003 593 astro-ph/0306386
53. M. Tegmark et al. SDSS Collaboration Phys. Rev. D 69 2004 103501 astro-ph/0310723
54. V. Barger et al. Phys. Lett. B 595 2004 55 hep-ph/0312065
55. P. Crotty J. Lesgourgues S. Pastor Phys. Rev. D 69 2004 123007 hep-ph/ 0402049
56. U. Seljak et al. astro-ph/0407372
57. G.L. Fogli et al. Phys. Rev. D 70 2004 113003
58. For recent discussions see S. Hannestad Phys. Rev. D 67 2003 085017 astro-ph/0211106
59. J. Lesgourgues S. Pastor L. Perotto Phys. Rev. D 70 2004 045016 hep-ph/ 0403296
60. MAINZ Collaboration hep-ex/0412056
61. TROITSK Collaboration Phys. Lett. B 460 1999 227
62. The latest results have been presented in a talk by V. Lobashev at the XI International Workshop on Neutrino Telescopes, Venezia, 22-25 February, 2005
63. KATRIN web site: http://www-ik1.fzk.de/tritium
64. IGEX Collaboration Phys. Rev. C 59 1999 2108
65. Cuoricino Collaboration hep-ex/0501034
66. Heidelberg-Moscow Collaboration Eur. Phys. J. A 12 2001 147 hep-ph/ 0103062
67. A. Staudt et al. Europhys. Lett. 13 1990 31
68. A. Staudt et al. Phys. Rev. C 46 1992 871
69. E. Caurier Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 1996 1954
70. V.A. Rodin et al. Phys. Rev. C 68 2003 044302
71. J. Engel et al. Phys. Rev. C 37 1988 871
72. C.E. Aalseth et al. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 17 2002 1475 hep-ex/0202018
73. Cuoricino Collaboration Phys. Lett. B 584 2004 260
74. Yu.G. Zdesenko F.A. Danevich V.I. Tretyak Phys. Lett. B 546 2002 206
75. ee in the case of inverted hierarchy is 'robust' and found a value in agreement with results in [33]