Social dominance orientation, prejudice, and discrimination: A new computer-based method for studying discriminatory behaviors

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 91-98

  Michinov, Nicolas ^a   Dambrun, Michaël ^b   Guimond, Serge ^b   Méot, Alain ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE POITIERS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CLERMONT AUVERGNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CAUCASIAN; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEADERSHIP; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NEGRO; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFRICAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; DATA COLLECTION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; HIERARCHY, SOCIAL; HUMANS; LEADERSHIP; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PREJUDICE; PROBABILITY; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOFTWARE; STATISTICS;

EID: 25144459619     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206402     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. ADORNO, T. W., FRENKEL-BRUNSWICK, E., LEVINSON, D. J., & SANFORD, R. N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
2. BARON, R. B., & KENNY, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3. BERRY, J. W., KALIN, R., & TAYLOR, D. M (1977). Multiculturalism and ethnic attitudes in Canada. Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada.
4. BOVENKERK, F., ROBERT, M., & GILLES, V. (1991). Comparative studies of migration and exclusion on the grounds of "race" and ethnic background in Western Europe: A critical appraisal. International Migration Review, 25, 375-391.
5. BRAUER, M., WASEL, W., & NIEDENTHAL, P. M. (2000). Implicit and explicit components of prejudice. Review of General Psychology, 4, 79-101.
6. BRIGHAM, J. C. (1993). College students' racial attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1933-1967.
7. 2 test of goodness of fit. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 25, 315-345.
8. DAMBRUN, M., & GUIMOND, S. (2001). La théorie de la privation relative et l'hostilité envers les nord-africains [Relative deprivation theory and hostility toward North Africans]. International Review of Social Psychology, 14, 57-89.
9. DAMBRUN, M., GUIMOND, S., & MICHINOV, N. (2003). Les composantes automatique et contrôlée des préjugés ethniques [Automatic and controlled components of ethnic prejudices]. International Review of Social Psychology, 16, 71-96.
10. DOVIDIO, J. F., & FAZIO, R. H. (1992). New technologies for the direct and indirect assessment of attitudes. In J. M. Tanur (Ed.), Questions about questions: Inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys. New York: Sage.
11. DRIGOTAS, S. M. (1993). Similarity revisited: A comparison of similarity-attraction versus dissimilarity-repulsion. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 365-377.
12. DUKE, M. P., & NOWICKI, S., JR. (1972). A new measure and social-learning model for interpersonal distance. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 6, 119-132.
13. ESSES, V. M., HADDOCK, G., & ZANNA, M. P. (1993). Values, stereotypes, and emotions as determinants of intergroup attitudes. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 137-166). New York: Academic Press.
14. FAZIO, R. H., JACKSON, J. R., DUNTON, B. C., & WILLIAMS, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 69, 1013-1027.
15. FESTINGER, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
16. FISKE, S. T. (2000). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination at the seam between the centuries: Evolution, culture, mind, and brain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 299-322.
17. GOLDBERG, A., MOURINHO, D., & KULKE, U. (1996). Labour market discrimination against foreign workers in Germany. Geneva: ILO.
18. GREENWALD, A. G., MCGHEE, D. E., & SCHWARTZ, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
19. GUIMOND, S., DAMBRUN, M., MICHINOV, N., & DUARTE, S. (2003). Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 84, 697-721.
20. GUIMOND, S., & PALMER, D. L. (1993). Developmental changes in ingroup favouritism among bilingual and unilingual Francophone and Anglophone students. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 12, 318-351.
21. HENRY, E., & GINSBERG, E. (1985). Who gets the work: A test of racial discrimination in employment in Toronto. Toronto: Urban Alliance on Race Relations and Social Planning Council of Metropolitan Toronto.
22. KALIN, R. (1981). Ethnic attitudes. In R. C. Gardner & R. Kalin (Eds.), A Canadian social psychology of ethnic relations. Toronto: Methuen.
23. KATZ, I., & HASS, R. G. (1988). Racial ambivalence and American value conflict: Correlational and priming studies of dual cognitive structures. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 55, 893-905.
24. LAMBERT, W. E., MOGHADDAM, F. M., SORIN, J., & SOWN S. S. (1990). Assimilation vs. multiculturalism: Views from a community in France. Sociological Forum, 5, 387-411.
25. LEPORE, L., & BROWN, R. (1997). Category and stereotype activation: Is prejudice inevitable? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 72, 275-287.
26. MICHINOV, E., & MONTEIL, J.-M. (2002). The similarity-attraction relationship revisited: Divergence between the affective and behavioral facets of attraction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 485-500.
27. PETTIGREW, T. F., JACKSON, J. S., BEN BRICKA, J., LEMAINE, G., MEERTENS, R. W., WAGNER, U., & ZICK, A. (1998). Outgroup prejudice in Western Europe. European Review of Social Psychology, 8, 241-273.
28. PETTIGREW, T. F., & MEERTENS, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57-75.
29. PRATTO, F., SIDIANUS, J., STALLWORTH, L. M., & MALLE, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
30. SCHMITT, M. T., BRANSCOMBE, N., & KAPPEN, D. M. (2003). Attitudes toward group-based inequality: Social dominance or social identity? British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 161-186.
31. SIDANIUS, J. (1993). The psychology of group conflict and the dynam ics of oppression: A social dominance perspective. In S. Iyengar & W. J. McGuire (Eds.), Explorations in political psychology (pp. 183-219). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
32. SIDANIUS, J., DEVEREUX, E., & PRATTO, F. (1992). A comparison of symbolic racism theory and social dominance theory as explanations for racial policy attitudes. Journal of Social Psychology, 132, 377-395.
33. SIDANIUS, J., LEVIN, S., FEDERICO, C. M., & PRATTO, F. (2001). Legitimizing ideologies: The social dominance approach. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice and intergroup relations (pp. 307-331). New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. SIDANIUS, J., & PRATTO, F. (1993). The inevitability of oppression and the dynamics of social dominance. In P. M. Sniderman, P. E. Tetlock, & E. G. Carmines (Eds.), Prejudice, politics, and the American dilemma (pp. 171-211). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
35. SIDANIUS, J., & PRATTO, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. SIDANIUS, J., PRATTO, F., & BOBO, L. (1996). Racism, conservatism, affirmative action, and intellectual sophistication: A matter of principled conservatism or group dominance? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 70, 476-490.
37. SIDANIUS, J., PRATTO, F., & MITCHELL, M. (1994). Ingroup identification, social dominance orientation, and differential intergroup social allocation. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 151-167.
38. SOBEL, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
39. SWIM, J. K., AIKIN, K. J., HALL, W. S., & HUNTER, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 68, 199-214.
40. TAJFEL, H., & TURNER, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
41. WHITLEY, B. E. (1999). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 77, 126-134.
42. WILSON, M. S., & LIU, J. H. (2003). Social dominance orientation and gender: The moderating role of gender identity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 187-198.
43. WITTENBRINK, B., JUDO, C. M., & PARK, B. (1997). Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 72, 262-274.