An item response theory-based pain item bank can enhance measurement precision

Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 278-288

  Lai, Jin Shei ^a   Dineen, Kelly ^a   Reeve, Bryce B ^b   Von Roenn, Jamie ^c   Shervin, Daniel ^a   McGuire, Michael ^a   Bode, Rita K ^c   Paice, Judith ^c   Cella, David ^a  

^a EVANSTON NORTHWESTERN HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer; Disease management; Item banking; Item response theory; Pain; Rasch

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CALIBRATION; CANCER PAIN; CANCER PATIENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMETRY;

ADULT; AGED; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, INTRACTABLE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; PSYCHOMETRICS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 25144456163     PISSN: 08853924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.03.009     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. S. Du Pen, A. Du Pen, and N. Polissar Implementing guidelines for cancer pain management: Results of a randomized controlled clinical trial J Clin Oncol 17 1999 361 370
2. K. Syrjala, and J. Abrams Cancer pain R.J. Gatchel D.C. Turk Psychosocial factors in pain: critical perspectives 1999 The Guildford Press New York 301 314
3. K. Virik, and P. Glare Pain management in palliative care Aust Fam Phys 29 2000 1027 1033
4. S.S. Hwang, V.T. Chang, and B. Kasimis Dynamic cancer pain management outcomes: the relationship between pain severity, pain relief, functional interference, satisfaction, and global quality of life over time J Pain Symptom Manage 23 2002 190 200
5. S. Otis-Green, R. Sherman, and M. Perez An integrated psychosocial-spiritual model for cancer pain management Cancer Pract 10 2002 S58 S65
6. J.E. Ware Jr., and C.D. Sherbourne The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection Med Care 30 1992 473 483
7. R. Melzack The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods Pain 1 1975 277 299
8. C.S. Cleeland, and K.M. Ryan Pain assessment: global use of the brief pain inventory Ann Acad Med 23 1994 129 138
9. R.D. Kerns, D.C. Turk, and T.E. Rudy The West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHYMPI) Pain 23 1985 345 356
10. M. Choiniere, and R. Amsel A visual analogue thermometer for measuring pain intensity J Pain Symptom Manage 11 1996 299 311
11. J.T. Farrar, J.P. Young Jr., and L. LaMoreaux Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale Pain 94 2001 149 158
12. M.P. Jensen, and P. Karoly Measurement of cancer pain via patient self-report C.R. Chapman K.M. Foley Current and emerging issues in cancer pain: research and practice 1993 Raven Press New York 193 218
13. A.E. Bonomi, D.L. Patrick, and D.M. Bushnell Quality of life measurement: will we ever be satisfied? J Clin Epidemiol 53 2000 19 23
14. R. Gatchel, and D. Turk Interdisciplinary treatment of chronic pain patients R. Gatchel D. Turk Psychosocial factors in pain 1999 The Guildford Press New York PP 435-444
15. S.-G. Baek Computerized adaptive testing using the partial credit model for attitude measurement M. Wilson G. Engelhard K. Draney Objective measurement IV: theory into practice 1997 Ablex Norwood, NJ 37 55
16. J.-S. Lai, D. Cella, and C.-H. Chang Item banking to improve, shorten and computerize self-reported fatigue: an illustration of steps to create a core item bank from the FACIT-Fatigue Scale Qual Life Res 12 2003 485 501
17. D.L. McArthur, and B. Choppin Computerized diagnostic testing J Educational Measure 21 1984 391 397
18. D.J. Weiss, and G. Kingsbury Application of computerized adaptive testing to educational problems J Educational Measure 21 1984 361 375
19. R.K. Bode, J.-S. Lai, and D. Cella Issues in the development of an item bank Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84 2003 S52 S60
20. B.D. Wright, and G.N. Masters Rating scale analysis: Rasch measurement 1982 MESA Press Chicago, IL
21. R.K. Bode Pivoting items for construct definition Rasch Meas Trans 11 1997 576 577
22. R. Bode Understanding Rasch measurement: partial credit model and pivot anchoring J Appl Meas 2 2000 78 95
23. J.M. Linacre WINSTEPS: Rasch analysis for all two-facet models 2002 MESA Press Chicago, IL
24. B.D. Wright, and J.M. Linacre Reasonable mean square fit values Rasch Meas Trans 8 1994 370
25. J. Stevens Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences 1996 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Mahwah, NJ
26. R.L. Gorsuch Factor analysis 1983 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, NJ
27. R.D. Bock A brief history of Item Response Theory M. du Toit IRT from SSI: BIOLOG-MG, MULTILOG, PARSCALE, TESTFACT 2003 Scientific Software International, Inc. Lincolnwood, IL
28. E. Timminga, and J.J. Adema Test construction from item banks G.H. Fischer I.W. Molenaar Rasch models: foundations, recent developments, and applications 1995 Springer-Verlag New York 111 130
29. F.B. Baker The basics of Item Response Theory 2001 ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation College Park, MD
30. T. Meuser, C. Pietruck, and L. Radbruch Symptoms during cancer pain treatment following WHO-guidelines: a longitudinal follow-up study of symptom prevalence, severity, and etiology Pain 93 2001 247 257
31. P.M. Kalua Cancer pain guidelines: are they being used? Results of a multi-site study conducted by the Hawaii Cancer Pain Initiative Hawaii Med J 57 1998 655 660
32. D.A. Revicki, and D.F. Cella Health status assessment for the twenty-first century: Item Response Theory, item banking and computer adaptive testing Qual Life Res 6 1997 595 600
33. D. Cella, and C.H. Chang A discussion of Item Response Theory (IRT) and its applications in health status assessment Med Care 38 2000 II66 II72
34. F. Wolfe, and T. Pincus Listening to the patient: a practical guide to self-report questionnaires in clinical care Arthritis Rheum 42 1999 1797 1808
35. J. Greenhalgh, and K. Meadows The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: a literature review J Eval Clin Pract 5 1999 401 416