Anaerobic digestion: Impact of future greenhouse gases mitigation policies on methane generation and usage

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 52, Issue 1-2, 2005, Pages 39-47

  Greenfield, P F ^a   Batstone, D J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Anaerobic processes; Greenhouse gases; Renewable energy; Wastewater treatment

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; CARBON DIOXIDE; GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; METHANE; NITROGEN OXIDES;

ANAEROBIC PROCESSES; GREENHOUSE GASES; RENEWABLE ENERGY;

WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; METHANE; NITROGEN; NITROUS OXIDE; OXYGEN;

EMISSION CONTROL; GREENHOUSE GAS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ANAEROBIC REACTOR; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DENITRIFICATION; DOMESTIC WASTE; ENERGY COST; GREENHOUSE GAS; METHANOGENESIS; NITRIFICATION; POLICY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; SLUDGE DIGESTION; TEMPERATURE MEASUREMENT; UPFLOW REACTOR; WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT;

EID: 25144446179     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2005.0496     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Batstone, D.J. and Keller, J. (2003). Industrial applications of the IWA anaerobic digestion model No. 1 (ADM1). Wat. Sci. Tech., 47(12), 199-206.
2. Barber, W.P. and Stuckey, D.C. (1999). The use of anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) for wastewater treatment: A review. Wat. Res., 33(7), 1559-1578.
3. European Commission. (2004). Participating in European Research; Guide for applicants under the 6th frame programme for European Research and Technological Development, Luxembourg, http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/fp6/pdf/how-to-participate_en.pdf
4. IPCC. (2000). Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2000.
5. IPCC. (2001). Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Houghton, J.T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D.J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P.J., Dai, X., Maskell, K. and Johnson, C.A. (eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY USA.
6. Gugele, B., Ritter, M. and Marečková, K. (2002). Greenhouse Gas Emission Trends in Europe, 1990-2000 Topic report 7/2002 European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark, http://reports.eea.eu.int/topic_report_2002_7/en/Topic_7.pdf
7. Keller, J. and Hartley, K. (2003). Greenhouse gas production in wastewater treatment: Process selection is the major factor. Wat. Sci. Tech., 47(12), 43-48.
8. Mösche, M. and Jördening, H.-J. (1998). Detection of very low saturation constants in anaerobic digestion: Influences of calcium carbonate precipitation and pH. Appl. Microbiol. Biotech., 49, 793-799.
9. 2 price rising, Dow Jones Newswire, November 19, 2003 05:28 ET (10:28 GMT).
10. Strous, M., Heijnen, J.J., Kuenen, J.G. and Jetten, M.S.M. (1998). The sequencing batch reactor as a powerful tool for the study of slowly growing anaerobic ammonium-oxidizing micro-organisms. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 50, 589-596.
11. US DOE. (2004). Hydrogen Posture Plan: An Integrated Research, Development, and Demonstration Plan. US Department of Energy, Feb 2004.
12. von Sperling, M. (1996). Comparison among the most frequently used systems for wastewater treatment in developing countries. Wat. Sci. Tech., 33(3), 59-72.
13. Zeng, R.J., Lemaire, R., Yuan, Z. and Keller, J. (2003). Simultaneous nitrification, denitrification and P removal in a lab-scale sequencing batch reactor. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 84(2), 170-178.