Isotope effects on the enzymatic and nonenzymatic reactions of chorismate

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 127, Issue 37, 2005, Pages 12957-12964

  Wright, S Kirk ^a   Declue, Michael S ^b   Mandal, Ajay ^b   Lee, Lac ^a   Wiest, Olaf ^c   Cleland, W Wallace ^a   Hilvert, Donald ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOSYNTHESIS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; HYDROGEN; POLARIZATION;

ENZYMATIC REACTIONS; ISOTOPE EFFECTS; POLARIZED TRANSITION STATE; TRANSITION STATE;

ENZYMES;

CHORISMIC ACID; ENOLPYRUVATE DERIVATIVE; HYDROGEN; ISOTOPE; MUTASE; OXYGEN; PYRUVIC ACID; PYRUVIC ACID DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BACILLUS SUBTILIS; BIOSYNTHESIS; CHEMICAL BOND; CHEMICAL REACTION; CLAISEN REARRANGEMENT; ELIMINATION REACTION; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME MECHANISM; ESCHERICHIA COLI; POLARIZATION; PROTON TRANSPORT; REACTION ANALYSIS;

CHORISMIC ACID; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; ISOTOPE LABELING; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 25144441741     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja052929v     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Addadi, L.; Jaffe, E. K.; Knowles, J. R. Biochemistry 1983, 22, 4494-4501.
2. Sogo, S. G.; Widlanski, T. S.; Hoare, J. H.; Grimshaw, C. E.; Berchtold, G. A.; Knowles, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 2701-2703.
3. (a) Wiest, O.; Houk, K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 11628-11639.
4. (b) Wiest, O.; Houk, K. N. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 7582-7584.
5. Andrews, P. R.; Smith, G. D.; Young, I. G. Biochemistry 1973, 12, 3492-3498.
6. Lee, A. Y.; Stewart, J. D.; Clardy, J.; Ganem, B. Chem. Biol. 1995, 2, 195-203.
7. Lee, A. Y.; Karplus, P. A.; Ganem, B.; Clardy, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 3627-3628.
8. Chook, Y. M.; Gray, J. V.; Ke, H. M.; Lipscomb, W. N. J. Mol. Biol. 1994, 240, 476-500.
9. Chook, Y. M.; Ke, H. M.; Lipscomb, W. N. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1993, 90, 8600-8603.
10. Gustin, D. J.; Mattei, P.; Kast, P.; Wiest, O.; Lee, L.; Cleland, W. W.; Hilvert, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1756-1757.
11. Gustin, D. J.; Hilvert, D. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 4935-4938.
12. Hirschbein, B. L.; Mazenod, F. P.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 3765-3766.
13. Grisostomi, C.; Kast, P.; Pulido, R.; Huynh, J.; Hilvert, D. Bioorg. Chem. 1997, 25, 297-305.
14. Mattei, P.; Kast, P.; Hilvert, D. Eur. J. Biochem. 1999, 261, 25-32.
15. MacBeath, G.; Kast, P.; Hilvert, D. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 10062-10073.
16. Kast, P.; AsifUllah, M.; Hilvert, D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 2691-2694.
17. Dell, K. A.; Frost, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 11581-11589.
18. Moore, B. S.; Cho, H. J.; Casati, R.; Kennedy, E.; Reynolds, K. A.; Mocek, U.; Beale, J. M.; Floss, H. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 5254-5266.
19. Kuzmic, P. Anal. Biochem. 1996, 237, 260-273.
20. Frisch, M. J.; et al. Gaussian 03, revision C.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2004.
21. Saunders, M.; Laidig, K. E.; Wolfsberg, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 8989-8994.
22. Bell, R. P. The Tunnel Effect in Chemistry; Chapman and Hall: New York, 1980; pp 60-63.
23. O'Leary, M. H. Methods Enzymol. 1980, 64, 83-104.
24. Zamir, L. O.; Tiberio, R.; Jensen, R. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 2815-2818.
25. The agreement between theory and experiment is poorer for the heavy atom isotope effects on the elimination reaction than for the Claisen rearrangement, probably due to the indirect nature of the experimental determinations. The discrepancy in the case of the deuterium isotope effects can be attributed to the fact that the one-dimensional tunneling correction is insufficient. An explicit quantum mechanical treatment of the nuclear hydrogen coordinate is likely to be required, but is currently not possible for systems of this size.
26. Dewar, M. J. S.; Healy, E. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 7127-7136.
27. Vance, R. L.; Rondan, N. G.; Houk, K. N.; Jensen, F.; Borden, W. T.; Komornicki, A.; Wimmer, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 2314-2315.
28. Dewar, M. J. S.; Jie, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 511-519.
29. Wiest, O.; Black, K. A.; Houk, K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 10336-10337.
30. Davidson, M. M.; Hillier, I. H.; Vincent, M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1995, 246, 536-540.
31. Yamabe, S.; Okumoto, S.; Hayashi, T. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 6218-6226.
32. Ziegler, F. E. Chem. Rev. 1988, 88, 1423-1452.
33. Gajewski, J. J.; Conrad, N. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 2747-2748.
34. McMichael, K. D.; Korver, G. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 2746-2747.
35. Coates, R. M.; Rogers, B. D.; Hobbs, S. J.; Peck, D. R.; Curran, D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 1160-1170.
36. Kupczyk-Subotkowska, L.; Saunders, W. H., Jr.; Shine, H. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 7153-7159.
37. Kupczyk-Subotkowska, L.; Subotkowski, W.; Saunders, W. H., Jr.; Shine, H. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 3441-3445.
38. Kupczyk-Subotkowska, L.; Saunders, W. H., Jr.; Shine, H. J.; Subotkowski, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 5957-5961.
39. Gajewski, J. J.; Brichford, N. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3165-3166.
40. Gajewski, J. J. Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 30, 219-225.
41. Gajewski, J. J.; Jurayj, J.; Kimbrough, D. R.; Gande, M. E.; Ganem, B.; Carpenter, B. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 1170-1186.
42. Meyer, M. P.; DelMonte, A. J.; Singleton, D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10865-10874.
43. This structure has slightly shorter C-O and C-C bond lengths than the transition state reported previously (ret 9), but the effect on the calculated heavy atom isotope effects is small. The relative looseness of the calculated transition state probably reflects electrostatic repulsion of the negatively charged carboxylate groups in the chair geometry, as well as the known bias of the B3LYP method (ref 27).
44. 13C isotope effect seen at C9 in the enzymatic reactions (Table 1) also argues against a stepwise mechanism, because the bond order to C9 is not expected to decrease substantially in such a process. Although the C-C-O-C torsional mode would be lost in the enolate intermediate, this will not give a full 1% isotope effect.
45. Guilford, W. J.; Copley, S. D.; Knowles, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5013-5019.
46. Kienhöfer, A.; Kast, P.; Hilvert, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3206-3207.
47. Worthington, S. E.; Roitberg, A. E.; Krauss, M. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2003, 94, 287-292.
48. Stewart, J.; Wilson, D. B.; Ganem, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 4582-4584.
49. Copley, S. D.; Knowles, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5008-5013.
50. Siebert, M.; Severin, K.; Heide, L. Microbiology-UK 1994, 140, 897-904.
51. Holden, M. J.; Mayhew, M. P.; Gallagher, D. T.; Vilker, V. L. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Protein Struct. Mol. Enzymol. 2002, 1594, 160-167.
52. Serino, L.; Reimmann, C.; Baur, H.; Beyeler, M.; Visca, P.; Haas, D. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1995, 249, 217-228.
53. Serino, L.; Reimmann, C.; Visca, P.; Beyeler, M.; Della Chiesa, V.; Haas, D. J. Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 248-257.
54. Gaille, C.; Kast, P.; Haas, D. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 21768-21775.