Intervention in writing composition strategies;Intervención en estrategias de revisión del mensaje escrito

Psicothema

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 194-202

  García, Jesús Nicasio ^a   Arias Gundín, Olga ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEÓN   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24944582580     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Alamargot, D. y Chanquoy, L. (2001). Through the models of writing. Kluwer Academic Puvlishers: Dordrecht.
2. Deal, C.R. (1996). The role of comprehension monitoring in children's revision. Educational Psychology review, 8(3), 219-238.
3. Butler, D.L., Elaschuk, C.L. y Poole, S. (2000). Promotoming strategic writing by postsecondary students with learning disabilities: A report of three case studies. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 196-213.
4. Cameron, C.A., Edmunds, G., Wigmore, B., Hunt, A.K. y Linton, M.J. (1997). Children's revision of textual flaws. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20(4), 667-680.
5. Chanquoy, L. (1997). Thinking skills and composing: Assessment (and treatment) strategies for text revisions. En: J.H.M. Hamers y M. Overtoom (Eds.), Inventory of European Programmes for teaching thinking (179-185). Utrecht: Sardes.
6. th grades. British Journal of educational psychology, 71, 15-41.
7. de la Paz, S. (2001). Stop and dare: A persuasive writing strategy. Intervention in School and Clinic, 36(4), 234-243.
8. Faigley, L. y Witte, S. (1981). Analyzing revision. College Composition and Communication, 32, 400-414.
9. Ferrari, M., Bouffard, T. y Rainville, L. (1998). What makes a good writer? Differences in good and poor writers' self-regulation of writing. Instructional Science, 26(6), 473-488.
10. Fitzgerald, J. (1987). Research on revision in writing. Review of Educational Research, 57(4), 481-506.
11. Fitzgerald, J. y Markham, L. (1987). Teaching children about revision in writing. Cognition and Instruction. 4(1), 3-24.
12. García, J.N. y de Caso, A.M. (2002). ¿Es posible mejorar la productividad y coherencia de los textos escritos por alumnos con dificultades de aprendizaje y/o bajorendimiento sin que cambie la disposición reflesiva de éstos hacia la escritura? Psicothema, 14(2), 456-462.
13. García, J.N. y de Caso, A.M. (en revisión a). Effects of a motivational intervention towards writing in children with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Quarterly.
14. García, J.N. y de Caso, A.M. (en revisión b). The role of motivation towards writing composition levels in the efficacy of an instructional study in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disability.
15. García, J.N. y Fidalgo, R. (2003). Diferencias en la conciencia de procesos psicológicos de la escritura, mecánicos frente a sustantivos y otros. Psicothema, 15(1), 41-48.
16. García, J.N. y Fidalgo, R. (en prensa). El papel del autoconocimiento de los procesos psicológicos de la escritura en la calidad de las composiciones escritas. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada.
17. García, J.N. y Marbán, J.M. (2003). El proceso de composición escrita en alumnos con DA y/o BR: estudio instruccional con énfasis en la planificación. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 26(1), 97-113.
18. García, J.N., Marban, J. y de Caso, A. (2001). Evaluatión colectiva de los procesos de planificación y factures psicológicos en la escritura (EPPyFPE). En García, Dificultades de aprendizaje e inlervención psicopedagógica (pp. 151-155). Barcelona: Ariel.
19. Graham, S. (1999a). The role of text production skill in writing development. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22(2), 75-77.
20. Graham, S. (1999 b). Handwriting and spelling instruction for students with learning disabilities: A review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22(2), 78-98.
21. Graham, S. y Harris, KR. (1996). Self-regulation and strategy instruction for students who find writing and leaning challenging. En Levy y Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing. Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 347-360). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
22. Graham, S. y Harris, K.R. (2000). The role of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development. Educational Psychologist, 35(1), 3-12.
23. Graham, S., Schwanz, S., McArthur, A. (1993). Knowledge of Writing and the composing process, attitude toward writing, and self-efficacy for students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of learning disabilities, 26(4), 237-2.
24. Guilford, W.H. (2001). Teaching peer review and the process of scientific writing. Advances in physiology education, 25(3), 167-175.
25. Hayes, J. R. y Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. En L.W. Gregg y E.R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in Writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Hayes, J.R. y Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. En L.W. Gregg y E R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in Writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Hayes, J.R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C.M. Levy y S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 1-27). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Hayes, J.R., Flower, L.S., Schriver, K.A., Stratman, J. y Carey, L. (1987). Cognitive processes in revision. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advance in psycholinguistics. Vol. 2: Reading, writing and language (176-240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Kellogg, R.T. (1994). The Psychology of Writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Klassen, R. (2002). Writing in early adolescence: A review of the role of self-efficacy beliefs. Educational psychology review, 14(2), 173-203.
31. Levy, C. M. y Ransdell, S. (Eds.) (1996). The science of writing: theories, methods, individual differences and applications. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Matsumura, L.C., Patthey-Chavez, G.G., Valdés, R. y Gamier, H. (2002). Teacher feedback, writing assignment quality, and tirad-grade students' revisión in lower-and higher-achieving urban schools. The Elementary School Journal, 103(1), 3-25.
33. McCutchen, D. (1996), A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 299-325.
34. Paulus, T.M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Languajge Writing, 8(3), 265-289.
35. Pérez, S.A. (2001). Revising During Writing in a Second Grade Classroom. Educational Research Quarterly, 25(1), 27-32.
36. Reder, L.M. y Schunn, C.D. (1996). Metacognition does not imply awareness: Strategy choice is governes by implicit learning and memory. En Reder (Ed.), Implicit memory and metacognition (pp. 45-77). Mahwat, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Rijlaarsdam, G., van den Bergh, H. y Couzijn, M. (Eds.) (1996). Theories, models and methodology in writing research. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
38. Sánchez, E., García, J.N. y del Río, P. (2002). Escribir es re-escribir: un análisis de contenidos de los informes realizados a los artículos no publicados en IyA. Infancia y Aprendizaje. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 25(1), 5-35.
39. Schoonen, R. y de Glopper, K. (1996). Writing perfomace and knowledge about writing. En G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Berg y M. Couzijn (Eds.), Theories, Models and Methodology in writing research (pp. 87-107). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
40. Scott, B.J. y Vitale, M.R. (2003). Teaching the writing process to students with LD. Intervention in school and clinic, 38(4), 220-224.
41. Torrance, M. y Galbraith, D. (Eds.) (1999). Knowing what to write: conceptual processes in text production. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
42. van der Hoeven, J. (1997). Children's composing. A study into the relationships between writing processes, text quality and cognitive and linguistic skills. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
43. van der Hoeven, J. (1999). Differences in writing performance: Generating as indicator. En G. Rijlaarsdam y E. Esperet (Eds. de la serie) y M. Torrance y D. Galbraith (Eds. del volumen), Studies in Writing: Vol. 4 Knowing What to Write: Conceptual Processes in Text Production (pp. 65-77). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
44. wan Waes, L. y Schellens, P.J. (2002). Writing profiles: the effect of the writing mode on pausing and revision patterns of experienced writers. Journal of Pragmatics. 35, 829-853.
45. Wong, B.Y.L. (1998). Reflections on Current Attainments and Future Directions in Writing Intervention Research in Learning Disabilities. Advances in Learning and Behavioural Disabilities, 12 (pp. 127-149).
46. Wong, B.Y.L. (1999). Metacognition in writing. In C. Gallimore, D. Bernheimer, D. MacMillan, D. Speece y S. Vaughn (Eds.), Developmental perspectives on children with high incidence disabilities (pp. 183-198). Marhwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. Wong, B.Y.L. (2000). Writing strategies instruction for expository essays for adolescents with and without learning disabilities. Topics in language disorders, 20(4), 29.
48. Wong, B.Y.L., Butler, D.L., Ficzere, S.A. y Kuperis, S. (1996). Teaching Students with Learning Disabilities and Low Achievers to Plan, Write and Revise Opinion Essays. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(2) (pp. 197-212).
49. Wong, B.Y.L., Butler, D.L., Ficzere, S.A. y Kuperis, S. (1997). Teaching Adolescents with Learning Disabilities and Low Achievers to Plan, Write and Revise Contrast Essays. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 12(1) (pp. 2-15).
50. nd Edit, orig. 1994).
51. Zhang, Y. (2000). Technology and the Writing Skills of Students with Learning Disabilities. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(4), 467-479.
52. Zimmerman, B.J. y Risemberg, R. (1997). Becoming a self-regulated writer: A social cognitive perspective. Contemporary educational Psychology, 22(1), 73-101.