Modeling social and individual trust in requirements engineering methodologies

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Volumn 3477, Issue , 2005, Pages 161-176

  Giorgini, Paolo ^a,b   Massacci, Fabio ^a,b   Mylopoulos, John ^a,b   Zannone, Nicola ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Agent Oriented Technologies; Information Technologies; Realization of prototypes; Requirements and methodologies; Security Trust; Social; Trust specification, analysis and reasoning

Indexed keywords

AGENTS; DATA ACQUISITION; SECURITY OF DATA; SECURITY SYSTEMS; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

AGENT-OREINTED TECHNOLOGIES; REALIZATIONS AND PROTOTYPES; REQUIREMENTS AND METHODOLOGIES; SECURITY & TRUST; SOCIAL; TRUST SPECIFICATION, ANALYSIS AND REASONING;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 24944578244     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/11429760_12     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. P. Bresciani, P. Giorgini, F. Giunchiglia, J. Mylopoulos, and A. Perini. TROPOS: An Agent-Oriented Software Development Methodology. JAAMAS, 8(3):203-236, 2004.
2. C. Castelfranchi and R. Falcone. Principles of trust for MAS: Cognitive anatomy, social importance and quantification. In Proc. of ICMAS'98, pages 72-79. IEEE Press, 1998.
3. F. den Braber, T. Dimitrakos, B. A. Gran, M. S. Lund, K. Stølen, and J. Ø. Aagedal. The CORAS methodology: model-based risk assessment using UML and UP. In UML and the unified process, pages 332-357. Idea Group Publishing, 2003.
4. T. Doan, S. Demurjian, T. C. Ting, and A. Ketterl. MAC and UML for secure software design. In Proc. of FMSE'04, pages 75-85. ACM Press, 2004.
5. P. Giorgini, F. Massacci, J. Mylopoulous, and N. Zannone. Requirements Engineering meets Trust Management: Model, Methodology, and Reasoning. In Proc. of iTrust'04, LNCS 2995, pages 176-190. Springer-Verlag, 2004.
6. Z. Guessoum, M. Ziane, and N. Faci. Monitoring and Organizational-Level Adaptation of Multi-Agent Systems. In Proc. of AAMAS'04, pages 514-521. ACM Press, 2004.
7. M. Hannoun, J. S. Sichman, O. Boissier, and C. Sayettat. Dependence Relations between Roles in a Multi-Agent System: Towards the Detection of Inconsistencies in Organization. In Proc. of 1st. Int. Workshop on Multi-Agent Based Simulation, LNCS 1534, pages 169-182. Springer-Verlag, 1998.
8. D. Huynh, N. R. Jennings, and N. R. Shadbolt, Developing an Integrated Trust and Reputation Model for Open Multi-Agent Systems. In Proc. of 7th Int. Workshop on Trust in Agent Societies, pages 65-74, 2004.
9. S. Jajodia, P. Samarati, M. L. Sapino, and V. S. Subrahmanian. Flexible support for multiple access control policies. TODS, 26(2):214-260, 2001.
10. J. Jürjens. Secure Systems Development with UML. Springer-Verlag, 2004.
11. G. A. Kaminka, D. V. Pynadath, and M. Tambe. Monitoring Teams by Overhearing: A Multi-Agent Plan-Recognition Approach. JAIR, 17:83-135, 2002.
12. T. Lodderstedt, D. Basin, and J. Doser. SecureUML: A UML-Based Modeling Language for Model-Driven Security. In Proc. of UML'02, LNCS 2460, pages 426-441. Springer-Verlag, 2002.
13. F. Massacci, M. Prest, and N. Zannone. Using a Security Requirements Engineering Methodology in Practice: The compliance with the Italian Data Protection Legislation. Comp. Standards & Interfaces, 2005. To Appear. An extended version is available as Technical report DIT-04-103 at eprints.biblio.unitn.it.
14. J. McDermott and C. Fox. Using Abuse Case Models for Security Requirements Analysis. In Proc. of ACSAC'99, pages 55-66. IEEE Press, 1999.
15. L. Ponemon. What Keeps Security Professionals Up At Night?, April 2003. URL: http://www.darwinmag.com/read/040103/threats.html.
16. I. Ray, N. Li, R. France, and D.-K. Kim. Using UML to visualize role-based access control constraints. In Proc. of SACMAT'04, pages 115-124. ACM Press, 2004.
17. J. S. Sichman and R. Conte. On personal and role mental attitudes: A preliminary dependence-based analysis. In Proc. of SBIA '98, LNCS 1515, pages 1-10. Springer-Verlag, 1998.
18. G. Sindre and A. L. Opdahl. Eliciting Security Requirements by Misuse Cases. In Proc. of TOOLS Pacific 2000, pages 120 -131. IEEE Press, 2000.
19. A. van Lamsweerde, S. Brohez, R. De Landtsheer, and D. Janssens. From System Goals to Intruder Anti-Goals: Attack Generation and Resolution for Security Requirements Engineering. In Proc. of RHAS'03, pages 49-56, 2003.