Testing the effectiveness of an innovative information package on practitioner reported behaviour and beliefs: The UK Chiropractors, Osteopaths and Musculoskeletal Physiotherapists Low back pain ManagemENT (COMPLeMENT) trial [ISRCTN77245761]

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 6, Issue , 2005, Pages

  Evans, David W ^a   Foster, Nadine E ^a   Underwood, Martin ^b   Vogel, Steven ^c   Breen, Alan C ^d   Pincus, Tamar ^e  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Keele University   (United Kingdom)

^c Research Centre   (United Kingdom)

^d ANGLO EUROPEAN COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; LOW BACK PAIN; MANIPULATIVE MEDICINE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSIOTHERAPY; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED KINGDOM;

CHIROPRACTIC; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; LOW BACK PAIN; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE; PHYSICAL THERAPY SPECIALTY; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;

EID: 24944577965     PISSN: 14712474     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-6-41     Document Type: Article

References (119)

1. Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG): Clinical Standards Advisory Group Report on Back Pain London: HMSO; 1994.
2. Maniadakis N, Gray A: The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain 2000, 84:95-103.
3. Breen AC: The implementation of consensus guidelines. 2003 [http://www.rygdoktor.dk/].
4. McGuirk B, King W, Govind J, Lowry J, Bogduk N: Safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute low back pain in primary care. Spine 2001, 26:2615-22.
5. Rossignol M, Abenhaim L, Séguin P, Neveu A, Collet J, Ducruet T, Shapiro S: Coordination of primary health care for back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Spine 2000, 25:251-8.
6. Field MJ, Lohr KN, Eds: Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program Institute of Medicine, Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990.
7. Cherkin D, Deyo RA, Berg AO, Bergman JJ, Lishner DM: Evaluation of a physician education intervention to improve primary care for low-back pain. I. Impact on physicians. Spine 1991, 16:1168-72.
8. Deyo RA, Schall M, Berwick DM, Nolan T, Carver P: Continuous quality improvement for patients with back pain. J Gen Intern Med 2000, 15:647-55.
9. Buchbinder R, Jolley D, Wyatt M: Population based intervention to change back pain beliefs and disability: three part evaluation. BMJ 2001, 322:1516-20.
10. Buchbinder R, Jolley D, Wyatt M: 2001 Volvo award winner in clinical studies: effects of a media campaign on back pain beliefs and its potential influence on management of low back pain in general practice. Spine 2001, 26:2535-42.
11. Underwood M, O'Meara S, Harvey E, The UK BEAM Trial Team: The acceptability to primary care staff of a multidisciplinary training package on acute back pain guidelines. Fam Pract 2002, 19:511-5.
12. Bekkering GE, Engers AJ, Wensing M, Hendriks HJ, van Tulder MW, Oostendorp RA, Bouter LM: Development of an implementation strategy for physiotherapy guidelines on low back pain. Aust J Physiother 2003, 49:208-14.
13. Bekkering GE, Hendriks HJM, Koes BW, Oostendorp RAB, Ostelo RWJG, Thomassen JMC, van Tulder MW: Clinical guidelines on physiotherapy for low back pain. Physiotherapy 2003, 89:82-96.
14. Breen A, Carr E, Mann E, Crossen-White H: Acute back pain management in primary care: a qualitative pilot study of the feasibility of a nurse-led service in general practice. J Nurs Manag 2004, 12:201-9.
15. Waddell G: The Back Pain Revolution 2nd edition. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2004.
16. Burton AK, Waddell G: Clinical guidelines in the management of low back pain. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol 1998, 12:17-35.
17. Koes BW, van Tulder MW, Ostelo R, Burton AK, Waddell G: Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison. Spine 2001, 26:2504-13.
18. Staal JB, Hlobil H, van Tulder MW, Waddell G, Burton AK, Koes BW, van Mechelen W: Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain: an international comparison. Occup Environ Med 2003, 60:618-26.
19. van Tulder MW, Tuut M, Pennick V, Bombardier C, Assendelft WJ: Quality of primary care guidelines for acute low back pain. Spine 2004, 29:E357-62.
20. Waddell G, McIntosh A, Hutchinson A, Feder G, Lewis M: Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Acute Low Back Pain London: Royal College of General Practitioners; 1996.
21. Waddell G, McIntosh A, Hutchinson A, Feder G, Lewis M: Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Acute Low Back Pain London: Royal College of General Practitioners; 1999.
22. Carter JT, Birrell LN, Eds: Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain at work - principal recommendations 2000 [http://www.facoccmed.ac.uk/library/index.jsp?ref=383]. London: Faculty of Occupational Medicine of the Royal College of Physicians
23. Waddell G, Burton AK: Occupational health guidelines for the management of low back pain at work - evidence review 2000 [http://www.facoc cmed.ac.uk/library/index.jsp?ref=383]. London: Faculty of Occupational Medicine of the Royal College of Physicians
24. Harvey E, Burton AK, Klaber-Moffett J, Breen AC: Spinal manipulation for low-back pain: a treatment package agreed by the UK chiropractic, osteopathy and physiotherapy professional associations. Man Ther 2003, 8:46-51.
25. Government Statistical Service: The prevalence of back pain in Great Britain in 1998. Bulletin based on the Office for National Statistics (ONS) Omnibus Survey module conducted in March, April and June 1998 2000 [http://www.dh.gov.uk/PublicationsAndStatistics/Publications/ PublicationsStatistics/PublicationsStatisticsArticle/fs/en?CONTENT_ID= 4006687&chk=XyxFKD]. London: ONS
26. Mason V: The prevalence of low back pain in Great Britain. A report on Office of Census & Population Surveys (OPCS) omnibus survey data produced on behalf of the Department of Health London: OPCS; 1994.
27. Funk SG, Champagne MT, Wiese RA, Tornquist EM: BARRIERS: the barriers to research utilization scale. Appl Nurs Res 1991, 4:39-45.
28. Funk SG, Champagne MT, Wiese RA, Tornquist EM: Barriers to using research findings in practice: the clinician's perspective. Appl Nurs Res 1991, 4:90-5.
29. Barta KM: Information-seeking, research utilization, and barriers to research utilization of pediatric nurse educators. J Prof Nurs 1995, 11:49-57.
30. Dunn V, Crichton N, Roe B, Seers K, Williams K: Using research for practice: a UK experience of the BARRIERS Scale. J Adv Nurs 1997, 26:1203-10.
31. Metcalfe C, Lewin R, Wisher S, Perry S, Bannigan K, Klaber-Moffett J: Barriers to implementing the evidence base in four NHS therapies. Physiotherapy 2001, 87:433-41.
32. Schers H, Wensing M, Huijsmans Z, van Tulder M, Grol R: Implementation barriers for general practice guidelines on low back pain a qualitative study. Spine 2001, 26:E348-53.
33. Gabbay J, le May A: Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed "mindlines?" Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care. BMJ 2004, 329:1013-8.
34. Hibble A, Kanka D, Pencheon D, Pooles F: Guidelines in general practice: the new Tower of Babel? BMJ 1998, 317:862-3.
35. Breen AC: Chiropractors and the treatment of back pain. Rheumatol Rehabil 1977, 16:46-53.
36. Burton AK: Back pain in osteopathic practice. Rheumatol Rehabil 1981, 20:239-46.
37. Pringle M, Tyreman S: Study of 500 patients attending an osteopathic practice. Br J Gen Pract 1993, 43:15-18.
38. Pedersen P: A survey of chiropractic practice in Europe. Euro J Chiro 1994, 42:1-28.
39. Foster NE, Thompson KA, Baxter GD, Allen JM: Management of nonspecific low back pain by physiotherapists in Britain and Ireland. A descriptive questionnaire of current clinical practice. Spine 1999, 24:1332-42.
40. Gracey JH, McDonough SM, Baxter GD: Physiotherapy management of low back pain: a survey of current practice in Northern Ireland. Spine 2002, 27:406-11.
41. Foster NE, Doughty G: Using clinical guidelines and research evidence in the management of back pain patients: a qualitative study of musculoskeletal physiotherapists in Britain. Presented at the International Forum V for Primary Care Research on Low Back Pain, Montréal, Canada 2002.
42. Rebain R, Baxter GD, McDonough S: The passive straight leg raising test in the diagnosis and treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a survey of United kingdom osteopathic opinion and clinical practice. Spine 2003, 28:1717-24.
43. Linton SJ, Vlaeyen J, Ostelo R: The back pain beliefs of health care providers: are we fear-avoidant? J Occup Rehabil 2002, 12:223-32.
44. Evans DW, Foster NE, Vogel S, Breen AC: Implementing evidence-based practice in the UK physical therapy professions: do they want it and do they feel they need it? Presented at the International Forum VI for Primary Care Research on Low Back Pain, Linkoping, Sweden 2003.
45. Daykin AR, Richardson B: Physiotherapists' pain beliefs and their influence on the management of patients with chronic low back pain. Spine 2004, 29:783-95.
46. Houben RMA, Vlaeyen JWS, Peters PMJC, Ostelo RWJG, Wolters PMJC, Stomp-van den Berg SGM: Health care providers' attitudes and beliefs towards common low back pain: Factor structure and psychometric properties of the HC-PAIRS. Clin J Pain 2004, 20:37-44.
47. Houben RM, Gijsen A, Peterson J, de Jong PJ, Vlaeyen JW: Do health care providers' attitudes towards back pain predict their treatment recommendations? Differential predictive validity of implicit and explicit attitude measures. Pain 2005, 114:491-8.
48. Houben RM, Ostelo RW, Vlaeyen JW, Wolters PM, Peters M, Stompvan den Berg SG: Health care providers' orientations towards common low back pain predict perceived harmfulness of physical activities and recommendations regarding return to normal activity. Eur J Pain 2005, 9:173-83.
49. Bishop A, Foster N: Do physical therapists in the United Kingdom recognize psychosocial factors in patients with acute low back pain? Spine 2005, 30:1316-1322.
50. Grol R, Thomas S, Roberts R: Development and implementation of guidelines for family practice: lessons from The Netherlands. J Fam Pract 1995, 40:435-9.
51. Grol R, Zwaard A, Mokkink H, Dalhuijsen J, Casparie A: Dissemination of guidelines: which sources do physicians use in order to be informed? Int J Qual Health Care 1998, 10:135-40.
52. Grol R, Grimshaw J: Evidence-based implementation of evidence-based medicine. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 1999, 25:503-13.
53. Grol R, Jones R: Twenty years of implementation research. Fam Pract 2000, 17(Suppl 1):S32-5.
54. van Tulder MW, Croft PR, van Splunteren P, Miedema HS, Underwood MR, Hendriks HJM, Wyatt ME, Borkan JM: Disseminating and implementing the results of back pain research in primary care. Spine 2002, 27:E121-7.
55. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination: Getting evidence into practice. Effective Health Care 1999, 5(1):1-16.
56. Freemantle N: Implementation strategies. Fam Pract 2000, 17(Suppl 1):S7-10.
57. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB: Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. J A M A 1995, 274:700-5.
58. Thorsen T, Mäkelä M, Eds: Changing Professional Practice: Theory and Practice of Clinical Guidelines Implementation Danish Institute for Health Services Research and Development; 1999.
59. Freemantle N, Harvey EL, Wolf F, Grimshaw JM, Grilli R, Bero LA: Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000, 2:CD000172.
60. Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, Mowatt G, Fraser C, Bero L, Grilli R, Harvey E, Oxman A, O'Brien MA: Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care 2001, 39(8 Suppl 2):II2-45.
61. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay CR, Vale L, Whitty P, Eccles MP, Matowe L, Shirran L, Wensing M, Dijkstra R, Donaldson C: Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004, 8(6):1-72.
62. Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, Haynes RB: No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. CMAJ 1995, 153:1423-31.
63. Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Tetroe J: Implementing clinical guidelines: current evidence and future implications. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2004, 24(Suppl 1):S31-7.
64. Cohen SJ, Weinberger M, Hui SL, Tierney WM, McDonald CJ: The impact of reading on physicians' nonadherence to recommended standards of medical care. Soc Sci Med 1985, 21:909-14.
65. Emslie C, Grimshaw J, Templeton A: Do clinical guidelines improve general practice management and referral of infertile couples? B M J 1993, 306:1728-31.
66. Bearcroft PW, Small JH, Flower CD: Chest radiography guidelines for general practitioners: a practical approach. Clin Radiol 1994, 49:56-8.
67. Grimshaw J: Evaluation of four quality assurance initiatives to improve out-patient referrals from general practice to hospital. Dissertation. University of Aberdeen 1998.
68. Mesters I, Meertens R, Kok G, Parcel GS: Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary education protocol in children with asthma (0-4years) in primary health care. J Asthma 1994, 31:347-59.
69. Oakeshott P, Kerry SM, Williams JE: Randomised controlled trial of the effect of the Royal College of Radiologists' guidelines on general practitioners' referral for radiographic examination. Br J Gen Pract 1994, 44:197-200.
70. Rabin DL, Boekeloo BO, Marx ES, Bowman MA, Russell NK, Willis AG: Improving office-based physician's prevention practices for sexually transmitted diseases. Ann Intern Med 1994, 121:513-19.
71. Bland JM: Sample size in guidelines trials. Fam Pract 2000, 17(Suppl 1):S17-20.
72. Wood J, Freemantle N: Choosing an appropriate unit of analysis in trials of interventions that attempt to influence practice. J Health Serv Res Policy 1999, 4:44-8.
73. O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Bagley L, Lewis D, Read M, Thompson R, Bogues W, Lentin S, Parr G, Aron B: The effect of orthodontic referral guidelines: a randomised controlled trial. Br Dent J 2000, 188:392-97.
74. Bland JM: Cluster randomised trials in the medical literature: two bibliometric surveys. BMC Med Res Methodol 2004, 4:21 [http://www.biomedcentral. com/1471-2288/4/21].
75. Eldridge SM, Ashby D, Feder GS, Rudnicka AR, Ukoumunne OC: Lessons for cluster randomized trials in the twenty-first century: a systematic review of trials in primary care. Clinical Trials 2004, 1:80-90.
76. Hahn S, Puffer S, Torgerson DJ, Watson J: Methodological bias in cluster randomised trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005, 5:10 [http://www.biomedcentral. com/1471-2288/5/10].
77. Farrin A, Russel I, Torgerson D, Underwood M: Differential recruitment in a cluster randomised trial in primary care - the experience of the UK Back pain, Exercise, Active management and Manipulation (UK BEAM) feasibility study. Clinical Trials 2005, 2:119-124.
78. Bekkering GE, van Tulder MW, Hendriks EJM, Koopmanschap MA, Knol DL, Bouter LM, Oostendorp RAB: Implementation of clinical guidelines on physical therapy for patients with low back pain: randomized trial comparing patient outcomes after a standard and active implementation strategy. Phys Ther 2005, 85:544-55.
79. Bekkering GE, Hendriks HJ, van Tulder MW, Knol DL, Hoeijenbos M, Oostendorp RA, Bouter LM: Effect on the process of care of an active strategy to implement clinical guidelines on physiotherapy for low back pain: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Qual Saf Health Care 2005, 14:107-12.
80. Engers AJ, Wensing M, van Tulder MW, Timmermans A, Oostendorp RA, Koes BW, Grol R: Implementation of the Dutch low back pain guideline for general practitioners: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Spine 2005, 30:559-600.
81. Schectman JM, Schroth WS, Verme D, Voss JD: Randomized controlled trial of education and feedback for implementation of guidelines for acute low back pain. J Gen Intern Med 2003, 18:773-80.
82. Dey P, Simpson CW, Collins SI, Hodgson G, Dowrick CF, Simison AJ, Rose MJ: Implementation of RCGP guidelines for acute low back pain: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract 2004, 54:33-7.
83. Sculpher M: Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of interventions designed to increase the utilization of evidence-based guidelines. Fam Pract 2000, 17(Suppl 1):S26-31.
84. Suarez-Almazor ME, Russell AS: The art versus the science of medicine. Are clinical practice guidelines the answer? Ann Rheum Dis 1998, 57:67-9.
85. Harding S: McTimoney Chiropractic: the first 25 years Abingdon, Oxford: McTimoney Chiropractic Association; 1997.
86. UK BEAM Trial Team: UK Back pain Exercise And Manipulation (UK BEAM) trial - national randomised trial of physical treatments for back pain in primary care: objectives, design and interventions. BMC Health Serv Res 2003, 3:16 [http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/3/16].
87. Working Backs Scotland Online [http://www.workingbackss cotland.com]
88. Buchbinder R, Jolley D: Population based intervention to change back pain beliefs: three year follow up population survey. B M J 2004, 328:321.
89. Feder G, Grange W, Hamlyn P, Hull S, Hussaini A, Kidd B, Kidner S, Montgomery J: Clinical guidelines for the management of acute low back pain in East London primary care London : Joint Academic Department of General Practice and Primary Care, St Bartholomew's and the Royal London School of Medicine and Dentistry; 1997.
90. Stevenson K, Hay EM: A survey of GP's and physiotherapists (PT) views on a physiotherapy led back pain service. Presented at the Society for Back Pain Research, Bristol, UK 2001.
91. Silagy CA, Weller DP, Lapsley H, Middleton P, Shelby-James T, Fazekas B: The effectiveness of local adaptation of nationally produced clinical practice guidelines. Fam Pract 2002, 19:223-30.
92. Deane K: Development of guidelines on lower back pain. Presented at the Chartered Society of Physiotherapists Annual Congress, Birmingham, UK 2004.
93. Kendall N, Linton SJ, Main CJ: Guide to Assessing Psychological Yellow Flags in Acute Low Back Pain: Risk factors for long-term disability and work loss 1997 [http://www.acc.co.nz/wcm001/groups/external_ip/documents/internet/ wcm002131.pdf]. Wellington, New Zealand: Accident Rehabilitation & Compensation Insurance Corporation of New Zealand and the National Health Committee
94. Roland M, Burton K, Waddell G, Klaber-Moffett J, Main C: The Back Book 1st edition. London: The Stationery Office; 1996.
95. Burton AK, Waddell G, Tillotson KM, Summerton N: Information and advice to patients with back pain can have a positive effect. A randomized controlled trial of a novel educational booklet in primary care. Spine 1999, 24:2484-91.
96. Health and Safety Executive: Back in work: managing back pain in the workplace. A leaflet for employers and workers in small businesses London: Health and Safety Executive; 2000.
97. Grol R, Dalhuijsen J, Thomas S, Veld C, Rutten G, Mokkink H: Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study. B M J 1998, 317:858-61.
98. Michie S, Johnston M: Changing clinical behaviour by making guidelines specific. B M J 2004, 328:343-5.
99. Hayward RS, Guyatt GH, Moore KA, McKibbon KA, Carter AO: Canadian physicians' attitudes about and preferences regarding clinical practice guidelines. Can Med Assoc J 1997, 156:1715-23.
100. Wennberg DE, Dickens JD Jr, Biener L, Fowler FJ Jr, Soule DN, Keller RB: Do physicians do what they say? The inclination to test and its association with coronary angiography rates. J Gen Intern Med 1997, 12:172-6.
101. Hartley RM, Charlton JR, Jarman B, Harris CM: Case history questionnaires in the study of doctors' use of resources: Are they measuring what we want? Med Care 1985, 23:1163-8.
102. Jones TV, Gerrity MS, Earp J: Written case simulations: Do they predict physicians' behavior? J Clin Epidemiol 1990, 43:805-15.
103. Morrell DC, Roland MO: Analysis of referral behaviour: responses to simulated case histories may not reflect real clinical behaviour. Br J Gen Pract 1990, 40:182-5.
104. Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M: Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction. A prospective study of 3 methods for measuring quality. J Am Med Assoc 1997, 283:1715-22.
105. Bombardier C, Jansz G, Maetzel A: Primary care physicians' knowledge, confidence, and attitude in the management of acute low back pain (ALBP). Arthritis Rheum 1995, 38(Suppl 9):S385.
106. Ammendolia C, Bombardier C, Hogg-Johnson S, Glazier R: Views on radiography use for patients with acute low back pain in an Ontario community. J Manip Physiol Ther 2002, 25:11-20.
107. Li LC, Bombardier C: Physical therapy management of low back pain: an exploratory survey of therapist approaches. Phys Ther 1999, 81:1018-28.
108. Maetzel A, Johnson SH, Woodbury M, Bombardier C: Use of grade membership analysis to profile the practice styles of individual physicians in the management of acute low back pain. J Clin Epidemiol 2000, 53:195-205.
109. Rainville J, Carlson N, Polatin P, Gatchel RJ, Indahl A: Exploration of physicians' recommendations for activities in chronic low back pain. Spine 2000, 25:2210-20.
110. Rainville J, Bagnall D, Phalen L: Health care providers' attitudes and beliefs about functional impairments and chronic back pain. Clin J Pain 1995, 11:287-95.
111. Riley JF, Ahern DK, Follick MJ: Chronic back pain and functional impairment: assessing beliefs about their relationship. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1988, 69:579-82.
112. Barrios FX, Riley JF: Cognitive factors and disability in chronic pain: is there more than just depression? Presented at the 21st Annual Meeting for the Advancement of Behavioural Therapy, Boston 1987.
113. Put CL, Witkower A: Pain and impairment beliefs in patients treated in an interdisciplinary inpatient pain program. Presented at the American Pain Society 10th Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA 1991.
114. Slater MA, Hall HF, Atkinson JH, Garfin SR: Pain and impairment beliefs in chronic low back pain; validation of the Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (PAIRS). Pain 1991, 44:51-6.
115. Russell ML, Verhoef MJ, Injeyan HS, McMorland DG: Response rates for surveys of chiropractors. J Manip Physiol Ther 2004, 27:43-8.
116. Konstantinou K, Foster N, Rushton A, Baxter D: The use and reported effects of mobilization with movement techniques in low back pain management; a cross-sectional descriptive survey of physiotherapists in Britain. Man Ther 2002, 7:206-14.
117. Bush T, Cherkin D, Barlow W: The impact of physician attitudes on patient satisfaction with care for low back pain. Arch Fam Med 1993, 2:301-5.
118. Smucker DR, Konrad TR, Curtis P, Carey TS: Practitioner selfconfidence and patient outcomes in acute low back pain. Arch Fam Med 1998, 7:223-8.
119. Connolly BH, Lupinnaci NS, Bush AJ: Changes in attitudes and perceptions about research in physical therapy among professional physical therapist students and new graduates. Phys Ther 2001, 81:1127-34.