Institutional quality and perceptions of representation in advanced industrial democracies

Comparative Political Studies

Volumn 38, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 850-874

  Rohrschneider, Robert ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Administration; Institutions; Majoritarian regimes; Public opinion; Representation

Indexed keywords

EID: 24944576762     PISSN: 00104140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010414005276305     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Anderson, C. J., & Guillory, C. (1997). Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: A cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems. American Political Science Review, 91, 1-16.
2. Anderson, C. J., & Tverdova, Y. V. (2003). Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government in contemporary democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 91-109.
3. Clarke, H., Dutt, N., & Kornberg, A. (1993). The political economy of attitudes toward polity and society in Western European democracies. Journal of Politics, 55(4), 998-1021.
4. Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
5. Dalton, R. J. (1985). Political parties and political representation party supporters and party elites in nine nations. Comparative Political Studies, 18(3), 267-299.
6. Dalton, R. J. (1987). Generational change in elite political beliefs: The growth of ideological polarization. Journal of Politics, 49, 976-997.
7. Dalton, R. J. (2002). Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies (3rd ed.). New York: Chatham.
8. Eichenberg, R., & Dalton, R. J. (1993). Europeans and the European community: The dynamics of public support for European integration. International Organization, 47(4), 507-534.
9. Eurostat. (2001). Eurostat 2001 yearbook. Brussels, Belgium: European commission.
10. Gabel, M. (1998). Integration and mass politics: Market liberalization and public attitudes in the European Union. American Journal of Political Science, 42(3), 936-953.
11. Gibson, J. L., & Caldeira, G. A. (1995). The legitimacy of transnational legal institutions: Compliance, support, and the European court of justice. American Journal of Political Science, 39(2), 459-489.
12. Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14. Iversen, T. (1994). Political leadership and representation in West European democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 38(1), 45-74.
15. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Zoido-Lobaton, P. (2003). Governance matters, III: Governance indicators for 1996-2002. Washington, DC: World Bank.
16. Kornberg, A., & Clarke, H. (1994). Beliefs about democracy and satisfaction with democratic government: The Canadian case. Political Research Quarterly, 47(3), 267-285.
17. Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy. Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18. Listhaug, O., & Wiberg, M. (1995). Confidence in political and private institutions. In H.-D. Klingemann & D. Fuchs, Citizens and the state (pp. 261-297). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
19. Miller, A. H., & Listhaug, O. (1990). Political parties and confidence in government: A comparison of Norway, Sweden and the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 20, 357-386.
20. Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2001). What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies. Comparative Political Studies, 34(1), 30-62.
21. Pharr, S. J. (2000). Officials' midconduct and public distrust: Japan and the trilateral democracies. In S. J. Pharr & R. D. Putnam, Disaffected democracies. What's troubling the trilateral countries? (pp. 173-200). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22. Pharr, S. J., & Putnam, R. D. (2000). Disaffected democracies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23. Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
24. Powell, G. B. (2000). Elections as instruments of democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25. Powell, G. B., & Whitten, G. D. (1993). A cross-national analysis of economic voting: Taking account of political context. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 391-414.
26. Rohrschneider, R. (2002). The democracy deficit and mass support for an EU-wide government. American Journal of Political Science, 46(2), 463-475.
27. Sanches-Cuenca, I. (2000). The political basis of support for European integration. European Union Politics, 1(2), 147-172.
28. Seligson, M. A. (2002). The impact of corruption of regime legitimacy: A comparative study of four Latin American countries. Journal of Politics, 46(2), 408-433.
29. Steenbergen, M., & Jones, B. (2002). Modeling multilevel data structures. American Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 218-237.
30. Thomassen, J., & Schmitt, H. (1997). Policy representation. European Journal of Political Research, 32, 165-184.
31. Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.