The Gail model predicts breast cancer in women with suspicious radiographic lesions

American Journal of Surgery

Volumn 190, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 526-529

  Weik, Jennifer L ^a   Lum, Sharon S ^a   Esquivel, Pamela A ^a   Tully, Richard J ^a   Bae, Won C ^a   Petersen, Floyd F ^b   Jaque, Jenny M ^c   Reeves, Mark E ^a   Garberoglio, Carlos A ^a  

^a LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

BI RADS; Breast cancer; Gail model; Mammogram

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RISK; CHI SQUARE TEST; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MODEL; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 24944573970     PISSN: 00029610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.06.006     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer statistics 2005. Accessed: February 26, 2005. Available from: http://www.cancer.org.
2. M.H. Gail, L.A. Brinton, D.P. Byar Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually J Natl Cancer Inst 81 1989 1879 1886
3. J.P. Constantino, M.H. Gail, D. Pee Validation studies for models projecting the risk of invasive and total breast cancer incidence J Natl Cancer Inst 91 1999 1541 1548
4. B. Rockhill, D. Spiegelman, C. Byrne Validation of the Gail et al model of breast cancer risk prediction and implications for chemoprevention J Natl Cancer Inst 93 2001 358 366
5. D.M. Euhus, A.M. Leitch, J.F. Huth Limitations of the Gail model in the specialized breast cancer risk assessment clinic Breast J 8 2002 23 27
6. B. Fisher, J.P. Costantino, D.L. Wickerham Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study J Natl Cancer Inst 90 1998 1371 1388
7. NSABP Protocol P-2 Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) for the prevention of breast cancer fact sheet. 1999;5.1:12.
8. Food and Drug Administration. Tamoxifen approval letter (10/29/1998). Accessed: March 15, 2005. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/cder/foi/appletter/ 1998/17970s40.pdf.
9. American College of Radiology The ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 2003 Accessed: February 26, 2005. Available from: http://www.acr.org.
10. Docket No. 99N-1502. Mammography Quality Standards Reauthorization Act of 1998 (MQSRA) (Public Law 105-248). Federal Register 1999;64:56210-1.
11. K. Kerlikowske, D. Grady, J. Barclay Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American college of radiology breast imaging reporting and data system J Natl Cancer Inst 90 1998 1801 1809
12. W.A. Berg, C. Campassi, P. Langenberg Breast imaging reporting and data system inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment AJR Am J Radiol 174 2000 1769 1777
13. S.H. Taplin, L.E. Ichikawa, K. Kerlikowske Concordance of breast imaging reporting and data system assessments and management recommendations in screening mammography Radiology 222 2002 529 535
14. L. Liberman, M. Drotman, E.A. Morris Imaging-histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy Cancer 89 2000 2538 2546