The ELPI response and data reduction II: Properties of kernels and data inversion

Aerosol Science and Technology

Volumn 39, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 583-595

  Lemmetty, Mikko ^a   Marjamäki, Marko ^a   Keskinen, Jorma ^a  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA REDUCTION; ELECTRIC FILTERS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PLATES (STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS); SINTERING;

ELECTRICAL LOW PRESSURE IMPACTOR (ELPI); INVERSION ALGORITHM; KERNELS; NUMERICAL QUALITY;

AEROSOLS;

AEROSOL; ALGORITHM; BAYES THEOREM; CALCULATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DEVICE; ELECTRICAL LOW PRESSURE IMPACTOR; FILTER; MASS; MEASUREMENT; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SIMULATION;

EID: 24944564667     PISSN: 02786826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/027868291009224     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Cooper, D.W., and Guttrich, G. L. (1981). A Study of the Cut Diameter Concept for Interpreting Particle Sizing Data, Atm. Env: 15:1699-1707.
2. Dong, Y., Hays, M. D., Smith, N. D., and Kinsey, J. S. (2004). Inverting Cascade Impactor Data for Size-Resolved Characterization of Fine Paniculate Source Emissions, J. Aerosol Sci. 35(12):1497-1512.
3. Dzubay, T. G. and Hasan, H. (1990). Fitting Multinormal Lognormal Size Distributions to Cascade Impactor Data, Aerosol. Sci. Technol. 13:144-150.
4. Gibson, H., Vincent, J. H., and Mark, D. (1987). A Personal Inspirable Dust Spectrometer for Applications in Occupational Hygiene Research, Ann. Occ. Hyg. 31:463-479. Referred to by Ramachandran and Kandlikar (1996).
5. Hansen, P. C. (1998). Rank-deficient and discrete ill-posed problems: Numerical aspects of linear inversion, SIAM, Philadelphia.
6. Hasan, H., and Dzubay, T. G. (1987). Size Distributions of Species in Fine Particles in Denver Using a Microorifice Impactor, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 6:29-39.
7. Keskinen, J., Pietarinen, K., and ja Lehtimäki, M. (1992). Electrical Low-Pressure Impactor, J. Aerosol Sci. 23:353-360.
8. Knutson, E. O., and Whitby, K. T. 1975. Aerosol Classification by Electric Mobility: Apparatus, Theory and Applications, J. Aerosol Sci. 6, 443.
9. Lekhtmakher, S., and Shapiro, M. (1999). Short communication on the paper "Inverse methods for analyzing Aerosol Spectrometer Measurements: A Critical Review," J. Aeros. Sci. 31(7):867-873.
10. Marjamäki, M., Ntziachristos, L., Virtanen, A., Ristimäki, J., Keskinen, J., Moisio, M., Palonen, M., and Lappi, M. (2002). Electrical filter stage for the ELPI. SAE paper 2002-01-0055.
11. Marjamäki, M., and Keskinen, J. (2003). Effect of Impaction Plate Roughness and Porosity on Collection Efficiency, J. Aerosol Sci. 35(3):301-308.
12. Marjamäki, M., Lemmetty, M., and Keskinen, J. (2005). ELPI response and data handling I: Response functions, submitted for Aerosol Sci. Tech.
13. Moisio, M. (1999). Real time size distribution measurement of combustion aerosols. PhD Thesis. Tampere University of Technology.
14. Puttock, J. S. (1981). Data Inversion for Cascade Impactors: Fitting Sums of Log-Normal Distributions, Athmos. Environ. 15(9): 1709-1716.
15. Raabe, O. G. (1978). A General Method for Fitting Size Distributions to Multi-component Aerosol Data Using Weighted Least-Squares, Envir. Sci. Technol. 12:1162-1167.
16. Ramachandran, G., and Kandlikar, M. (1996). Bayesian Analysis for the Inversion of Aerosol Size Distribution Data, J. Aeros. Sci. 27(6):1099-1112.
17. Sundelof, L. (1967). On the Accurate Calculation of Particle Size Distributions in Aerosols from Impaction Data, Staub Rainhalt. Luft 27:22-28.
18. Tatsch, C. E., Yeager, W. M., and Johnson, G. L. (1984). PADRE: A Computerized Data Reduction System for Cascade Impactor Measurements, JAPCA 34(6):655-660.
19. Tikhonov, A. N. (1963). Solution of Incorrectly Formulated Problems and the Regularization Method, Soviet Math. Dokl., 4:1035-1038.
20. English translation Of Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR, 151:501-504. Referred to by Hansen (1998).
21. Twomey, S. (1979). Introduction to the mathematics of inversion in remote sensing and indirect measurements, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
22. Virtanen, A., Marjamäki, M, Ristimäki, J., and Keskinen, J. (2001). Fine Particle Losses in Electrical Low Pressure Impactor, J. Aerosol Sci. 32:389-401.
23. Wang, S. C., and Flagan, R. C. (1990). Scanning Electrical Mobility Spectrometer, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 13:230-240.
24. Wolfenbarger, J. K., and Seinfeld, J. H. (1990). Inversion of Aerosol Size Distribution Data, J. Aerosol, Sci. 2:227-247.