The time course of figure-ground reversal

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 67, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 595-605

  Hulleman, Johan ^a,b   Gedamke, Luan ^a   Humphreys, Glyn W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 24944552378     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193517     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. BAYLIS, G. C., & CALE, E. M. (2001). The figure has a shape, but the ground does not: Evidence from a priming paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 633-643.
2. DRIVER, J., & BAYLIS, G. C. (1996). Edge-assignment and figure-ground segmentation in short-term visual matching. Cognitive Psychology, 31, 248-306.
3. GIRGUS, J. J., ROCK, I., & EGATZ, R. (1977). The effect of knowledge of reversibility on the reversibility of ambiguous figures. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 550-556.
4. HULLEMAN, J., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2004). A new cue to figure-ground coding: Top-bottom polarity. Vision Research, 44, 2779-2791.
5. LAMME, V. A. F., ZIPSER, K., & SPEKREIJSE, H. (1998). Figure-ground activity in primary visual cortex is suppressed by anesthesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 3263-3268.
6. PALMER, S. E. (1999). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. PETERSON, M. A., DE GELDER, B., RAPCSAK, S. Z., GERHARDSTEIN, P. C., & BACHOUD-LEVI, A. C. (2000). Object memory effects on figure assignment: Conscious object recognition is not necessary or sufficient. Vision Research, 40, 1549-1567.
8. PETERSON, M. A., & GIBSON, B. S. (1994). Must figure-ground organization precede object recognition? An assumption in peril. Psychological Science, 5, 253-259.
9. PINNA, B., WERNER, J. S., & SPILLMANN, L. (2003). The watercolor effect: A new principle of grouping and figure-ground organization. Vision Research, 43, 43-52.
10. STRÜBER, D., & STADLER, M. (1999). Differences in top-down influences on the reversal rate of different categories of reversible figures. Perception, 28, 1185-1196.
11. VECERA, S. P., VOGEL, E. K., & WOODMAN, G. F. (2002). Lower region: A new cue for figure-ground assignment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 194-205.
12. WOLFE, J. M., OLIVA, A., HOROWITZ, T. S., BUTCHER, S. J., & BOMPAS, A. (2002). Segmentation of objects from backgrounds in visual search tasks. Vision Research, 42, 2985-3004.