Determination of chlortetracycline in swine plasma by LC-ESI/MS/MS

Biomedical Chromatography

Volumn 19, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 523-528

  Beaudry, Francis ^a   del Castillo, Jérôme R E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Chlortetracycline; Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry; Quantification; Swine

Indexed keywords

EXTRACTION; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY;

CHLORTETRACYCLIN; LC-ESI-MS/MS; LC/ESI-MS/MS; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY - MASS SPECTROMETRIES; PROTEIN PRECIPITATION EXTRACTIONS; QUANTIFICATION; RAPID METHOD; SAMPLE PREPARATION; SENSITIVE METHOD; SWINE;

ACETONITRILE;

ACETONITRILE; CHLORTETRACYCLINE; FORMIC ACID; PROTEIN; WATER;

ACCURACY; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BIOASSAY; CALIBRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG DETERMINATION; DRUG STRUCTURE; ELECTROSPRAY MASS SPECTROMETRY; EXTRACTION; FLOW RATE; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; PLASMA; PRECIPITATION; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; SUPERNATANT; SWINE; TANDEM MASS SPECTROMETRY;

SUS SCROFA;

EID: 24944551915     PISSN: 02693879     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bmc.474     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Apley MD, Brown SA, Fedorka-Cray PJ, Ferenc S, House JK, Riviere JE, Rice LB, Thornsberry C and Waddell J. Role of veterinary therapeutics in bacterial resistance development: animal and public health perspectives. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 1998; 212: 1209-1213.
2. Beaudry F. Statistical evaluation of linearity and non linearity of LC/MS/MS quantitation analysis. Pharmaceutical Science 2000; 1(4): 2437.
3. Behal V and Hunter IS. Tetracyclines. Biotechnology 1995; 28: 359-384.
4. Brosen WB, Lehnenbauer T, Ji D and Connor J. Economic impacts of banning subtherapeutic use of antibiotics in swine production. Journal of Agriculture and Applied Economics; 2002; 34(3): 489-500
5. Burch DGS. Pharmacokinetics-antimicrobial sensitivity and resistance. Pig Journal 2003; 52: 150-165.
6. Buser HR, Muller MD and Theobald N. Occurrence of the pharmaceutical drug clofibric acid and the herbicide mecoprop in various Swiss lakes and in the North Sea. Environmental Science & Technology 1998; 32: 188-182.
7. Del Castillo JRE, Elsener J and Martineau GP. Pharmacokinetic modeling of in-feed tetracyclines in pigs using a meta-analytic compartmental approach. Swine Health and Production 1998; 6(5): 189-202.
8. Duggar BM. Aureomycin, a product of the continuing search for new antibiotics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1948; 51: 177-181.
9. Haack BJ and Andrews RE Jr. Isolation of Tn916-like conjugal elements from swine lot effluent. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 2000; 46: 542-549.
10. Holm JV, Rugge K, Bjerg PL and Christensen TH. Occurrence and distribution of pharmaceutical organic compounds in the groundwater downgradient of a landfill (Grindsted, Denmark). Environmental Science & Technology 1995; 29: 1415-1420.
11. King R, Bonfiglio R, Fernandez-Metzler C, Miller-Stein C and Olah T. Mechanistic investigation of ionization suppression in electrospray ionization. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry 2000; 11: 942-950.
12. Levy SB. The challenge of antibiotic resistance. Scientific American 1998; 278: 46-53.
13. Malorny B, Schroeter A and Helmuth R. Incidence of quinolone resistance over the period 1986 to 1998 in veterinary Salmonella isolates from Germany. Antimicrobial Agents & Chemotherapy 1999; 43: 2278-2282.
14. Martínez-Larrañaga MR, Anadón A, Martínez MA, Díaz MJ, Frejo MT, Castellano VJ, Isea G and de la Cruz CO. Pharmacokinetics of amoxycillin and the rate of depletion of its residues in pigs. Veterinary Record 2004; 154: 627-632.
15. Meyer MT, Bumgarner JE, Varns JL, Daughtridge JV, Thurman EM and Hostetler KA. Use of radioimmunoassay as a screen for antibiotics in confined animal feeding operations and confirmation by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Science of the Total Environment 2000; 248: 181-187.
16. NCCLS. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals; approved standard, 2nd edn (Document M31-A2). National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards: Wayne, PA, 2002.
17. Nielsen and P. Influence of feed on the oral bioavailability of antibiotics and chemotherapeutic agents in pigs [Danish]. Dansk Veterinaertidsskrift 1997; 80: 495-501.
18. Oka H, Nakazawa H, Harada K and Macneil JD (eds). Chemical analysis for antibiotics used in agriculture. AOAC International: Arlington VA, 1995
19. Prescott JF. Antimicrobial drugs: miracle drugs or pig feed? Advances in Pork Production 2000; 11: 37-45.
20. Roloff J. Drugged water: does it matter that pharmaceuticals are turning up in our water supplies? Science News 1998; 153: 187-189.
21. Sokol J and Matisova E. Determination of tetracycline antibiotics in animal tissues of food-producing animals by high-performance liquid chromatography using solid-phase extraction. Journal of Chromatography A 1994; 669: 75-80.
22. Swick RA. Role of growth promotants in poultry and swine feed. American Soybean Association. Technical Bulletin 1996; AN04: 10.