The effects of distributed group support and process structuring on software requirements development teams: Results on creativity and quality

Journal of Management Information Systems

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 127-153

  Ocker, Rosalie ^a   Hiltz, Starr Roxanne ^a   Turoff, Murray ^a   Fjermestad, Jerry ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Distributed group support; Group creativity; Group support systems; Software requirements analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 24944534150     PISSN: 07421222     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07421222.1995.11518094     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Adrianson, L., and Hjelmquist, E. Group processes in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Behavior and Information Technology, 10, 4 (1991), 281-296.
2. Amabile, T.M. The social psychology of creativity: a componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 2 (1983), 357-376.
3. Arunachalam, V. Computer-mediated communication and structure interaction in transfer pricing negotiation. Journal of Information Systems (1994).
4. Boehm, B.W. Software Engineering Economics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1981.
5. Burke, K., and Chidambaram, L. Development in electronically-supported groups, a preliminary longitudinal study of distributed and face-to-face meetings. Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IV, 1994, pp. 104-113.
6. Canning, R. 1977. Getting the requirements right. EDP Analyzer, 15, 7 (1977), 1-13.
7. Clapper, D.L.; McLean, E.R.; and Watson, R.T. An experimental investigation of the effect of a group decision support system on normative influence in small groups. Proceedings of the Twelfth ICIS, 1991, pp. 273-282.
8. Conklin, J., and Burgess Yakemovic, K.C. Process-oriented design rationale. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 3-4 (1991), 357-391.
9. Couger, J.D.; Higgins, L.F.; and McIntyre, S.C. (Un)structured creativity in information systems organizations. MIS Quarterly (December 1993), 375-397.
10. Curtis, B.; Krasner, H.; and Iscoe, N. A field study of the software design process for large systems. Communications of the ACM, 31 (1988), 1268-1287.
11. Daft, R.L., and Lengel, R.H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32, 5 (1986), 554-571.
12. Daly, B. 1993. The influence of face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication channels on collective induction. Accounting. Management and Information Technology, 3, 1 (1993), 1-22.
13. Daniels, Jr., R.M.; Dennis, A.R.; Hayes, G.; Nunamaker, J.F.; and Valacich, J. Enterprise analyzer: electronic support for group requirements elicitation. Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 3 (1991), 43-52.
14. Dubrovsky, V.J.; Kiesler, S.; and Sethna, B.N. The equalization phenomena: status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 6 (1991), 119-146.
15. Dufner, D.; Hiltz, S.; and Turoff, M. A preliminary analysis of the effects of the use of voting tools and sequential processing. Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4 (1994), 114-123.