Improved genetic algorithms for deterministic optimization and optimization under uncertainty. Part I. Algorithms development

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 44, Issue 18, 2005, Pages 7132-7137

  Diwekar, U M ^a   Xu, W ^a  

^a Vishwamitra Research Institute Illinois   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HAMMERSLEY SEQUENCE SAMPLING (HSS); MONTE CARLO SAMPLING; STOCHASTIC OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; OPTIMIZATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; RANDOM PROCESSES; UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS;

GENETIC ALGORITHMS;

ALGORITHM;

EID: 24944533080     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie049127d     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Diwekar U. A novel sampling approach to combinatorial optimization under uncertainty, Comput. Optim. Appl. 2003, 24, 335-371.
2. Holland, J. H. Adaptation in Natural and Artifical System; University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor, MI, 1975.
3. Koza, J. R. Genetic programming: on the programming of computers by means of natural selection. Complex Adaptive Systems; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1992.
4. Fogel, G. B.; Owens, A. J.; Walsh, M. J. Artificial Intelligence Through Simulated Evolution; Wiley: New York, 1966.
5. Rechenberg, I. Evolutionstrategie: Optimieriung technischer systeme nach prinzipien der biologischen evolution; Frommann-Holzboog: Stuttgart, Germany, 1973.
6. Schwefel, H. Evolution and Optimum Seeking; Wiley: New York, 1995.
7. Tarafder, A.; Rangaiah, G. P.; Ray, A. K. Multiobjective optimization of an industrial styrene monomer manufacturing process. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2005, 60, 347-363.
8. Michalewicz, Z. Genetic Algorithm + Data structure = Evolution Programs, 3rd ed.; Springer-Verlag: New York, 1996.
9. Deb, K; Agrawal, R. B. Simulated binary crossover for continuous search space. Complex Syst. 1995, 9, 115-148.
10. Herrera, F.; Lozano, M. Adaptation of genetic algorithm parameters based on fuzzy logic controllers. In Genetic Algorithms and Soft Computing; Herrera, F., Verdegay, J., Eds.; Physica-Verlag: Heidelberg, Germany, 1996; pp 95-125.
11. Özdamar, L. A genetic algorithm approach to a general category project scheduling problem. IEEE Trans, Syst., Man, Cybern., Part C: Appl. Rev. 1999, 29, 44-59.
12. Diwekar, U. M.; Kalagnanam, J. R. Efficiency sampling technique for optimization under uncertainty. AIChE J. 1997, 43, 440-447.
13. Iman, R. L.; Conover, W. J. Small-sample sensitivity analysis technique for computer models, with an application to risk assessment. Commun. Stat., Part A: Theory and Methods 1982, 17, 1749-1842.
14. Gen, M.; Cheng, R. Genetic Algorithms & Engineering Optimization; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 2000.
15. Dantzig, G.; Glynn, P. Parallel processors for planning under uncertainty. Ann. Operat. Res. 1990, 22, 1-21.
16. Kim, K.-J.; Diwekar, U. M. Efficient Combinatorial Optimization under Uncertainty. 1. Algorithmic Development. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41, 1276-1284.
17. Salazar, R.; Toral, R. Simulated annealing using hybrid Monte Carlo. J. Stat. Phys. 1997, 89, 1047-1060.
18. Painton, L. A.; Diwekar, U. M. Synthesizing optimal design configurations for a brayton cycle power plant. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1994, 18, 365-381.
19. Bayer, H. G. Toward a theory of evolution strategies: Self-adaptation. Evol. Comput. 1996, 3, 311-347.
20. Diwekar, U. M. Introduction to applied optimization. Applied optimization; Kulwer Academic Publishers: Norwell, MA, 2003, Vol. 80.
21. Chaudhuri, P.; Diwekar, U. M. Synthesis approach to the determination of optimal waste blends under uncertainty. AIChE J. 1999, 45, 1671-1687.
22. Kim, K. J.; Diwekar, U. M. Characterizing Sampling Error for Optimization Under Uncertainty: A Fractal Geometry Approach. Presented at INFORMS Annual Meeting, Atlanta, GA, 2003.