Access marries archive: BioMed central/pubmed central: An open access partnership

Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 1-15

  Youngkin, Mary E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Archives; BioMed central; Digital archives; Electronic journals; Open access; Pay to pub lish; Periodicals; Publishing; PubMed central; Scholarly communication; Subscriptions

Indexed keywords

EID: 24944532645     PISSN: 15424065     EISSN: 15424073     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J383v01n04_01     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Guterman, Lila. 2004. “The Promise and Peril of ‘Open Access’”. Chronicle of Higher Education, 50 January 30:A1012A14
2. McLellan, Faith. 2004. “Publishers Face Backlash Over Rising Subscription Costs”. Lancet, 363 January 3:44–5.
3. Quint, Barbara. 2004. “The End of the ‘Big Deal’ Era”. Information Today, 21 Janu-ary:7
4. What is BioMed Central?” Available:http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/Accessed:April 19, 2004
5. Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing Available:http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htmAccessed:April 19, 2004
6. Butler, Declan. 2003. “Who Will Pay for Open Access?”. Nature, 425 October 9:554–5.
7. Malakoff, David. 2003. “Opening the Books on Open Access”. Science, 302 October 24:550–4.
8. Nature Focus:Access to the Literature:The Debate Continues Available:http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate Accessed:April 19, 2004
9. Velterop, Jan. “The Myth of ‘Unsustainable’ Open Access Journals”. In Nature Focus:Access to the Literature:The Debate Continues Available:http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/10.htmlAccessed:April 19, 2004
10. Hunter, Karen. “Open Access:Yes, No, Maybe”. In Nature Focus:Access to the Literature:The Debate Continues Available:http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/10.htmlAccessed:April 19, 2004
11. Journal Archiving” Available:http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/libraries/archiveAccessed:April 19, 2004
12. Mann, Howard, and Djulbegovic, Benjamin. 2003. “Choosing a Control Intervention for a Randomised Clinical Trial”. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 3 April 22:7 Available:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471–2288/3/7
13. PubMed Central Overview” Available:http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/about/intro.htmlAccessed:April 19, 2004
14. Albanese, Andrew. 2004. “BioMed Central Changes Tack”. Library Journal, 29 March 15:17–8.
15. Glenn, David, and Guterman, Lila. 2003. “Hot Type”. Chronicle of Higher Education, 50 November 7:A20
16. Plutchak, Scott T., 2004. “Embracing Open Access”. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 92 January:1–3.
17. Peay, Wayne J., April 12 2004. April 12, [e-mail correspondence]
18. The Washington DC Principles for Free Access to Science:A Statement from Non-for-Profit Publishers Available:http://www.dcprinciples.orgAccessed:April 19, 2004
19. Library and Advocacy Organizations Praise Call for Free Access to Science Available:http://www.arl.org/sparc/core/index.asp?page=f79Accessed:April 19, 2004
20. Everngam, Raymond L., Jr. April 21 2004. ASCB. [e-mail correspondence] April 21
21. Ballard, Aron. 2003. “Berkeley Professor Challenges Publishing Status Quo”. The Daily Californian, Oct 20 Available:http://dailycal.com/article.php?id=13201Accessed:April 19, 2004
22. Cornell University Library. April 22 2004. “Issues in Scholarly Communication” April 22, Available:http://www.library.cornell.edu/scholarlycommAccessed
23. Held, Michael J., 2003. “Proposed Legislation Supports an Untested Publishing Model”. Journal of Cell Biology, 162 July 21:171–2.
24. Science and Technology Committee, House of Commons, Parliament, United Kingdom. “New Inquiry:Scientific Publications” Available:http://www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_committees/science_and_technology_committee/scitech111203a.cfmAccessed:April 26, 2004
25. Mellman, Ira. 2004. “Providing Realistic Access”. Journal of Cell Biology, 165 April 12:19–20.
26. Watson, Linda A., Login, Ivan S., and Burns, Jeffrey M., 2003. “Exploring New Ways of Publishing:A Library-Faculty Partnership”. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 91 April:245–7.