Alternatives to methyl bromide for strawberry runner plant production

HortScience

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1709-1715

  Kabir, Zahangir ^a,e   Fennimore, Steven A ^a   Duniway, John M ^a,e   Martin, Frank N ^b   Browne, Gregory T ^a,e   Winterbottom, Christopher Q ^c,f   Ajwa, Husein A ^a,e   Westerdahl, Becky B ^a,e   Goodhue, Rachael E ^a,e   Haar, Milton J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^c Sierra Cascade Nursery Inc   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^e University of Minnesota ^*

^f California Strawberry Commission   (United States)

Author keywords

1,3 dichloropropene; Dazomet; Fragaria xananassa; High elevation nursery; Iodomethane; Low elevation nursery; Methyl bromide; Strawberry runner plant; Strawberry yield

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FRUITS; SOIL MECHANICS;

1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE; DAZOMET; FRAGARIA XANANASSA; IODOMETHANE; METHYL BROMIDE; STRAWBERRY RUNNER PLANT;

PLANT CELL CULTURE;

FRUITS; FUMIGATION; NURSERIES; PLANTS; POLLUTION CONTROL; SOIL MECHANICS;

FRAGARIA X ANANASSA; FRAGARIA XANANASSA;

EID: 24944527455     PISSN: 00185345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.40.6.1709     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ajwa H.A. and T. Trout. 2004. Drip application of alternative fumigants to methyl bromide for strawberry production. HortScience 39:1707-1715.
2. Ajwa H.A., T. Trout, J. Mueller, S. Wilhelm, S.D. Nelson, R. Soppe, and D. Shatley. 2002. Application of alternative fumigants through drip irrigation systems. Phytopathology 92:1349-1355.
3. Allen, M.A. 2003. Midas soil fumigant, registration and development update. Annu. Intl. Res. Conf. Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions. Abstr. 24.
4. Anbar, A.D., Y.L. Young, and F.P. Chavez. 1996. Methyl bromide: Ocean sources, ocean sinks, and climate sensitivity. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 10:175-190.
5. BASF. 1997. Basamid Granular sample label. BASF Corp., Research Triangle Park, N.C.
6. Becker J.O., H.D. Ohr, N.M. Grech, M.E. McGiffen, Jr., and J.J. Sims. 1998. Evaluation of methyl iodide as a soil fumigant in container and small field plot studies. Pesticide Sci. 52:58-62.
7. Carpenter, J., L. Lynch, and T. Trout. 2001. Township limits on 1,3-D will impact adjustment to methyl bromide phase-out. Calif. Agr. 55:(3)12-18.
8. Carter, C.A., J.A. Chalfant, R.E. Goodhue, F.M. Han, and M. DeSantis. 2005. The economic effects of the methyl bromide ban on the California strawberry industry. Rev Agr. Econ. (in press).
9. California Department of Food and Agriculture. 2002. Nursery inspection procedures manual 7, approved nematode certification program. 23 Apr. 2005 http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/phpps/pe/nipm_pdfs/nipm_7.pdf.
10. California Department of Pesticide Regulation. 2003. Summary of pesticide use report data 2003: indexed by chemical. Calif. Dept. Pesticide Regulat., Sacramento. 5 Mar. 2005. http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/pur/pur03rep/chmrpt03.pdf.
11. Crop Protection Reference. 2004. Telone C35 sample label, p. 957-960. In: 2004 Crop protection reference. C&P Press, New York.
12. California Strawberry Commission. 1999. Crop profile of strawberries in California. National Pesticide Assessment Program. 18 June 2004. http://pestdata.ncsu.edu/cropprofiles/docs/castrawberries.html.
13. Crop Data Management System. 2004. Chloropicrin sample label. 18 June 2004. http://www.cdms.net/ldat/ld6GP000.pdf.
14. DeCal, A., A. Martinez-Treceno, J.M. Lopez-Aranda, and P. Melgarejo. 2004a. Chemical alternatives to methyl bromide in Spanish strawberry nurseries. Plant Dis. 88:210-214.
15. DeCal, A., P. Melgarejo, A. Martinez-Treceno, T. Salto, M.L. Martinez-Beringola, J.M. Garcia-Baudin, D. Garcia-Sinovas, E. Garcia-Mendez, M. Becerril, J.J. Medina, and J.M. Lopez-Aranda. 2004b. Chemical alternatives to MB for strawberry nurseries in Spain, 2003 results. Annu. Intl. Res. Conf. Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions. Abstr. 17.
16. Duniway, J.M. 2002. Status of chemical alternatives to methyl bromide for preplant fumigation of soil. Phytopath. 92:1337-1343.
17. Duniway, J.M. and W.D. Gubler. 1996. Evaluation of some chemical and cultural alternatives to methyl bromide fumigation of soil in a California Strawberry production system. Annu. Intl. Res. Conf. Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions. Abstr. 37.
18. Duniway, J.M., C.L. Xiao, and W.D. Gubler. 1998. Response of strawberry to soil fumigation: Microbial mechanisms and some alternatives to methyl bromide. Annu. Intl. Res. Conf. Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions. Abstr. 6.
19. Eayre, C.G., J.J. Sims, H.D. Ohr, and B. Mackey. 2000. Evaluation of Methyl iodide for control of peach replant disorder. Plant Dis. 84:1177-1179.
20. Eitel, J. 1995. The effectiveness of dazomet as influenced by the use of plastic sheeting. Acta Hort. 382:76-85.
21. Fennimore, S.M. Haar and H. Ajwa. 2001. Alternative fumigant efficacy on weeds in strawberry nursery and fruiting fields. Annu. Intl. Res. Conf. Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions. Abstr. 39.
22. Fritsch, H.J. and R. Huber. 1995. Basamid granular-A halogen-free soil disinfestant. Acta Hort. 382:76-85.
23. Harris, D.C. 1991. A comparison of dazomet, chloropicrin and methyl bromide as soil disinfestants for strawberries. J. Hort. Sci. 66:51-58.
24. Hokanson, S.C. and C.F. Finn. 2000. Strawberry cultivar use in North America. HortTechnology 10:94-106.
25. Johnson, A.W., S.M. McCarter, and R.E. Williams. 1979. Chemical control of nematodes and soilborne plant-pathogenic fungi on cabbage transplants. J. Nematol. 11:138-144.
26. Johnson, A. W. and J. Fiedmesser. 1987. Nematicides: A historical review, p. 448-454; In J.A. Veech and D.W. Dickson (eds.). Vistase on nematology. Soc. Nematol., Hyattsville, Md.
27. Larson, K.D. 1994. Strawberry, p 271-297. In: B. Scheffer and P. C. Andersen (eds.) Handbook of environmental physiology of fruit crops. vol. 1. Temperate fruits. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla.
28. Larson, K.D. 1997. Nursery soil fumigation regime affects strawberry transplant production, transplant size and subsequent fruit yield. Annu. Intl. Res. Conf. Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions. Abstr. 43.
29. Larson, K.D. and D.W. Shaw. 2000. Soil Fumigation and runner plant production: A synthesis of four years of strawberry nursery field experiments. HortScience 35:642-646.
30. Mappes, D. 1995. Spectrum of activity of dazomet. Acta Hort. 382:96-103.
31. Martin, F.N. 2003. Development of alternative strategies for management of soilborne pathogens currently control with methyl bromide. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 41:325-350.
32. National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2003. Vegetable 2002 summary. Agr. Stat. Board, NASS, USDA, Wash., D.C.
33. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2002. WMO/UNEP scientific assessment of ozone depletion: 2002. 18 June 2004. http://www.al.noaa.gov/WWWHD/pubdocs/Assessment02/executive-summary.html#A1.
34. Noling, J.W. and J.O. Becker. 1994. The challenge of research and extension to define and implement alternatives to methyl bromide. J. Nematol. (Suppl.)26(4S):573-586.
35. Ohr, H.D., J.J. Sims, N.M. Grech, J.O. Becker, and M.E. McGiffen, Jr. 1996. Methyl iodide, an ozone safe alternative as a soil fumigant. Plant Dis. 80:731-735.
36. Park, B.S. and P.J. Landshoot. 2003. Effect of dazomet on annual bluegrass emergence and creeping bentgrass establishment in turf maintained as a golf course fairway. Crop Sci. 43:1387-1394.
37. Roby, D.M. and M.W. Melichar. 1997. 1,3-Dichloropropene regulatory issues, p. 25-31. In: J.N. Seiber, J. A. Knuteson, J.E. Woodrow, N.L. Wolfe, M.V. Yates, and S.R. Yates (eds.). Fumigants: Environmental fate, exposure, and analysis. Amer. Chem. Soc., Wash., D.C.
38. Shaw, D.V. and K.D. Larson. 1999. A meta-analysis of strawberry yield response to preplant soil fumigation with combinations of methyl bromide-chloropicrin and four alternative systems. HortScience 34(5):839-845.
39. Strand L.L. 1994. Integrated pest management for strawberries. Univ. Calif. Statewide Integrated Pest Mgt. Project, Div. Agr. Nat. Resour. Publ. 3351.
40. U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service. 2000. Economic implications of the methyl bromide phaseout. Agr. Info. Bul. 756.
41. U.S. Department of State. 2003. Methyl bromide critical use nomination of preplant soil use on strawberry nurseries in open fields or in protected environments. 18 June 2004. http://www.epa.gov/spdpublc/mbr/ 2004_USStrawberryNursery.pdf.
42. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1993. Protection of stratospheric ozone. Fed. Reg. 58:15014-15049.
43. Voth, V. 1989. The effect of nursery location latitude on California winter planted strawberries. Acta Hort. 265:2883-2884.
44. Voth, V and RS. Bringhurst. 1990. Culture and physiological manipulation of California strawberries. HortScience 25:889-892.
45. Wilhelm, S 1966. Chemical treatments and inoculum potential of soil. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 4:53-78.
46. Wilhelm, S. and A.O. Paulus, 1980. How soil fumigation benefits the California strawberry industries. Plant Dis. 64:264-270.
47. Zhang, W.M., M.E. McGiffen, Jr., J.O. Becker, H.D. Ohr, J.J. Sims, and R.L. Kallenbach. 1997. Dose response of weeds to methyl iodide and methyl bromide. Weed Res. 37:181-189.