Neural latencies do not explain the auditory and audio-visual flash-lag effect

Vision Research

Volumn 45, Issue 23, 2005, Pages 2917-2925

  Arrighi, Roberto ^a   Alais, David ^b   Burr, David ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c CNR Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche   (Italy)

Author keywords

Auditory motion; Cross modal; Flash lag effect; Neural latencies; Temporal integration

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLASH LAG EFFECT; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; LIGHT; MOTION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NERVE CONDUCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND; STIMULATION; TECHNIQUE; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 24944517044     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.09.020     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. D. Alais, and D. Burr The "flash-lag" effect occurs in audition and cross-modally Current Biology 13 2003 59 63
2. D. Alais, and D. Burr The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration Current Biology 14 3 2004 257 262
3. T.D. Albright Direction and orientation selectivity of neurons in visual area MT of the macaque Journal of Neurophysiology 52 1984 1106 1113
4. J.T. Brebner, and A.T. Welford Introduction: an historical background sketch A.T. Welford Reaction Times 1980 Academic Press New York 1 23
5. E. Brenner, and J.B. Smeets Motion extrapolation is not responsible for the flash-lag effect Vision Research 40 13 2000 1645 1648
6. K.H. Britten, M.N. Shadlen, W.T. Newsome, and J.A. Movshon The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance Journal of Neuroscience 12 12 1992 4745 4765
7. R.L. Butler, and R.A. Humanski Localization of sounds in the vertical plane with and without high-frequency spectral cues Perception Psychophysics 51 1992 182 186
8. S. Carlile The physical and the psychophysical basis of sound S. Carlie Virtual auditory space: generation and applications 1996 Lindens Austin TX Ch 2
9. D.M. Eagleman, and T.J. Sejnowski Motion integration and postdiction in visual awareness Science 287 5460 2000 2036 2038
10. D.M. Eagleman, and T.J. Sejnowski Flash-lag effect: differential latency, not postdiction. Response Science 2000 290,1051a
11. F. Galton On instruments for (1) testing perception of differences of tint and for (2) determining reaction time Journal of the Anthropological Institute 19 1899 27 29
12. B. Krekelberg, and M. Lappe A model of the perceived relative positions of moving objects based upon a slow averaging process Vision Research 40 2 2000 201 215
13. B. Krekelberg, and M. Lappe Neuronal latencies and the position of moving objects Trends Neuroscience 24 6 2001 335 339
14. T.D. Lamb, and E.N. Pugh Jr. A quantitative account of the activation steps involved in phototransduction in amphibian photoreceptors Journal of Physiology 449 1992 719 758
15. D.M. Mackay Perceptual stability of a stroboscopically lit visual field containing self-luminous objects Nature 181 4607 1958 507 508
16. S. Mateeff, and J. Hohnsbein Perceptual latencies are shorter for motion towards the fovea than for motion away Vision Research 28 6 1988 711 719
17. W. Metzger Versuch einer gemeinsamen Theorie der Phänomene Fröhlichs und Hazelhoffs und Kritik ihrer Verfahren zur Messung der Empfindungszeit Psychologische Forschung 16 1932 176 200
18. I. Murakami A flash-lag effect in random motion Vision Research 41 24 2001 3101 3119
19. R. Nijhawan Motion extrapolation in catching Nature 370 6487 1994 256 257
20. R.J. Snowden, and O.J. Braddick The temporal integration and resolution of velocity signals Vision Research 31 5 1991 907 914
21. S. Soto-Faraco, J. Lyons, M. Gazzaniga, C. Spence, and A. Kingstone The ventriloquist in motion: illusory capture of dynamic information across sensory modalities Brain Research Cognition Brain Research 14 1 2002 139 146
22. R.J. van Beers, D.M. Wolpert, and P. Haggard Sensorimotor integration compensates for visual localization errors during smooth pursuit eye movements Journal of Neurophysiology 85 5 2001 1914 1922
23. A.B. Watson, and D.G. Pelli QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method Perception Psychophysics 33 2 1983 113 120
24. A.T. Welford Choice reaction time: basic concepts A.T. Welford Reaction Times 1980 Academic Press New York 73 128
25. D. Whitney, and I. Murakami Latency difference, not spatial extrapolation Nature Neuroscience 1 8 1998 656 657
26. D. Whitney, I. Murakami, and P. Cavanagh Illusory spatial offset of a flash relative to a moving stimulus is caused by differential latencies for moving and flashed stimuli Vision Research 40 2 2000 137 149