Applying authorship analysis to Arabic web content

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Volumn 3495, Issue , 2005, Pages 183-197

  Abbasi, Ahmed ^a   Chen, Hsinchun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; DATA PRIVACY; ELECTRONIC MAIL; FORMAL LANGUAGES; INTERNET; PUBLIC POLICY; SECURITY OF DATA;

AUTHORSHIP; INTERNET COMMUNICATION; POLITICAL CLIMATE; SECURITY ISSUES;

WEBSITES;

EID: 24944516697     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/11427995_15     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Adamson, George W. and J. Boreham (1974) The use of an association measure based on character structure to identify semantically related pairs of words and document titles. Information Storage and Retrieval,. Vol 10, pp 253-260
2. Al-Fedaghi Sabah S. and Fawaz Al-Anzi (1989) A new algorithm to generate Arabic root-pattern forms. Proceedings of the 11th National Computer Conference, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia., pp04-07.
3. Baayen, H., Halteren, H. v., Neijt, A., & Tweedie, F. (2002). An experiment in authorship attribution. Paper presented at the In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Statistical Analysis of Textual Data (JADT 2002).
4. Beesley, K.B. (1996) Arabic Finite-State Morphological Analysis and Generation. Proceedings of COLING-96, pp 89-94.
5. Burrows, J. F. (1987). Word patterns and story shapes: the statistical analysis of narrative style. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 2, 61-67.
6. Chen, H., Shankaranarayanan, G., Iyer, A., & She, L. (1998). A machine learning approach to inductive query by examples: an experiment using relevance feedback, ID3, Genetic Algorithms, and Simulated Annealing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(8), 693-705.
7. De Roeck, A. N. and Al-Fares, W. (2000) A morphologically sensitive clustering algorithm for identifying Arabic roots. In Proceedings ACL-2000. Hong Kong, 2000.
8. De Vel, O. (2000). Mining E-mail authorship. Paper presented at the Workshop on Text Mining, ACM International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD'2000).
9. De Vel, O., Anderson, A., Corney, M., & Mohay, G. (2001). Mining E-mail content for author identification forensics. SIGMOD Record, 30(4), 55-64.
10. Diab, Mona, Kadri Hacioglu and Daniel Jurafsky. Automatic Tagging of Arabic Text: From raw text to Base Phrase Chunks. Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2004
11. Diederich, J., Kindermann, J., Leopold, E., & Paass, G. (2000). Authorship attribution with Support Vector Machines. Applied Intelligence.
12. Dietterich, T.G., Hild, H., & Bakiri, G., (1990), A comparative study of ID3 and Back-propagation for English Text-to-Speech mapping, Machine Learning, 24-31.
13. Forsyth, R. S., & Holmes, D. I. (1996). Feature finding for text classification. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 11(4).
14. Hmeidi, I., Kanaan, G. and M. Evens (1997) Design and Implementation of Automatic Indexing for Information Retrieval with Arabic Documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48/10, pp 867-881.
15. Holmes, D. I. (1992). A stylometric analysis of Mormon Scripture and related texts. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, 155, 91-120.
16. Holmes, D. I. (1998). The evolution of stylometry in humanities. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 13(3), 111-117.
17. Hoorn, J. F., Frank, S. L., Kowalczyk, W., & Ham, F. V. D. (1999). Neural network identification of poets using letter sequences. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 14(3), 311-338.
18. Larkey, L. S. and Connell, M. E. Arabic information retrieval at UMass in TREC-10. In TREC 2001 Gaithersburg: NIST, 2001.
19. Ledger, G. R., & Merriam, T. V. N. (1994). Shakespeare, Fletcher, and the two Noble Kinsmen. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 9, 235-248.
20. Lowe, D., & Matthews, R. (1995). Shakespeare vs. Fletcher: a stylometric analysis by radial basis functions. Computers and the Humanities, 29, 449-461.
21. Martindale, C., & McKenzie, D. (1995). On the utility of content analysis in author attribution: The Federalist. Computer and the Humanities, 29(259-270).
22. Mealand, D. L. (1995). Correspondence analysis of Luke. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 10(171-182).
23. Mendenhall, T. C. (1887). The characteristic curves of composition. Science, 11(11), 237-249.
24. Mosteller, F., Frederick, & Wallace, D. L. (1964). Applied Bayesian and classical inference: the case of the Federalist papers (2 ed.): Springer-Verlag.
25. Mosteller, F., & Wallace, D. L. (1964). Inference and disputed authorship: the Federalist: Addison-Wesley.
26. Peng, F., Schuurmans, D., Keselj, V., & Wang, S. (2003). Automated authorship attribution with character level language models. Paper presented at the 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL 2003).
27. Quinlan, J. R. (1986). Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning, 1(1), 81-106.
28. Rudman, J. (1998). The state of authorship attribution studies: some problems and solutions. Computers and the Humanities, 31, 351-365.
29. Stamatatos, E., Fakotakis, N., & Kokkinakis, G. (2001). Computer-based authorship attribution without lexical measures. Computers and the Humanities, 35(2), 193-214.
30. Tweedie, F. J., Singh, S., & Holmes, D. I. (1996). Neural Network applications in stylometry: the Federalist papers. Computers and the Humanities, 30(1), 1-10.
31. Van Rijsbergen, C. J. Information retrieval. London: Butterworths, 1979.
32. Vapnik, V. (1995). The nature of statistical learning theory. New York: Springer Verlag.
33. Yule, G. U. (1938). On sentence length as a statistical characteristic of style in prose. Biometrika, 30.
34. Yule, G. U. (1944). The statistical study of literary vocabulary. Cambridge University Press.
35. Zheng, R., Qin, Y., Huang, Z., & Chen, H. (2003). Authorship Analysis in Cybercrime Investigation. Paper presented at the In Proceedings of the first NSF/NIJ Symposium, ISI2003, Tucson, AZ, USA.