Phenotypic plasticity of growth trajectory and ontogenic allometry in response to density for Eucalyptus hybrid clones and families

Annals of Botany

Volumn 96, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 811-821

  Bouvet, Jean Marc ^a   Vigneron, Philippe ^a   Saya, Aubin ^b  

^a CIRAD   (France)

^b Research Unit on Plantation Productivity UR2PI   (Congo)

Author keywords

Allometry; Circumference; Clones; Correlation; Density; Eucalyptus; Full sib family; Growth trajectory; Height; Hybrid; Phenotypic plasticity; Variance components

Indexed keywords

ALLOMETRY; FOREST; HYBRID; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; POPULATION DENSITY;

ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; ECOSYSTEM; EUCALYPTUS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; PLANT STEM; TIME;

BODY SIZE; ECOSYSTEM; EUCALYPTUS; PHENOTYPE; PLANT STEMS; TIME FACTORS;

EUCALYPTUS; EUCALYPTUS GRANDIS; EUCALYPTUS HYBRIDA; EUCALYPTUS TERETICORNIS; EUCALYPTUS UROPHYLLA;

EID: 24944513395     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mci231     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Alves LF, Santos FAM. 2002. Tree allometry and crown shape of four tree species in Atlantic rain forest, south-east Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology 18: 245-260.
2. Archibald S, Bond WJ. 2003. Growing tall vs. growing wide: tree architecture and allometry of Acacia karroo in forest, savanna, and arid environments. Oikos 102: 3-14.
3. Balocchi CE, Bridgwater FE, Zobel BJ, Jahromi S. 1993. Age trends in genetic parameters for tree height in a nonselected population of loblolly pine. Forest Science 39: 231-251.
4. Becker WA. 1984. Manual of quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Pullman, WA: Academic Enterprises.
5. Bennington CC, McGraw JB. 1996. Environment-dependence of quantitative genetic parameter in Impatiens pallida. Evolution 50: 1083-1097.
6. Blows MW, Sokolowski MB. 1995. The expression of additive and nonadditive genetic variation under stress. Genetics 140: 1149-1159.
7. Bonser SP, Aarssen LW. 2003. Allometry and development in herbaceous plants: functional responses of meristem allocation to light and nutrient availability. American Journal of Botany 90: 404-412.
8. Bouillet JP, Lefevre M. 1996. Influence des éclaircies sur la forme du tronc de Pinus kesiya. Bois et Forêts des Tropiques 248: 17-30.
9. Bouvet J-M. 1991. Analyse des tests clonaux d'Eucalyptus hybrides. Réflexions sur la méthodologie de sélection. MSc Thesis, Institut National Agronomique Paris.
10. Bouvet J-M. 1995. Evolution de la variabilité avec l'âge et corrélation juvénile-adulte dans des populations d'Eucalyptus. PhD Thesis, INAPG, Paris.
11. Bouvet J-M. 1997. Effect of spacing on juvenile growth and variability of eucalyptus clones. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research, 27: 174-179.
12. Bouvet J-M, Vigneron PH. 1995. Age trends in variances and heritabilities in Eucalyptus factorial mating designs. Silvae Genetica 44: 206-216.
13. Bouvet J-M, Vigneron PH. 1996. Variance structure in Eucalyptus hybrid populations. Silvae Genetica 45: 171-177.
14. Bouvet J-M, Vigneron PH, Saya A, Gouma R. 2003. Trends in variances and heritabilities with age for growth traits in eucalyptus spacing experiments. Silvae Genetica 52: 121-132.
15. Brouard JS, John S. 1999. Tree spacing affects clonal ranking in Eucalyptus grandisxE. urophylla hybrids. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 10: 13-23.
16. Campbell RK, Echols RM, Stonecypher RW. 1986. Genetic variances and interaction in 9-year-old Douglas fir grown at narrow spacings. Silvae Genetica 35: 24-31.
17. Chen HYH, Klinka K. 1998. Survival, growth, and allometry of planted Larix occidentalis seedlings in relation to light availability. Forest Ecology and Management 106: 169-179.
18. Coomes DA, Grubb PJ. 1998. A comparison of 12 tree species of Amazonian caatinga using growth rates in gaps and understorey, and allometric relationships. Functional Ecology 12: 426-435.
19. Danjon F. 1994. Heritabilities and genetic correlations for estimated growth curve parameters in maritime pine. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 89: 911-921.
20. Dhote JF. 1997. Effets des éclaircies sur le diamètre dominant dans des futaies régulières de hêtre ou de chêne sessile. Revue Forestière Française XLIX - 6.
21. Dreyfus PH. 1990. Interaction génotype-densité et compétition dans un dispositif clinal d'épicéa commun. Annales des Sciences Forestières 47: 1-16.
22. Evert F. 1971. Spacing studies a review. In Information report FMR-X-37 of the Forest Management Institute. Canadian Forestry Services, Department of the Environment.
23. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics, Harlow: Longman Science and Technology.
24. Gallais A. 1991. Théorie de la sélection en amélioration des plantes. Paris: Editions Masson.
25. Gion J-M. 2001. Etude de l'architecture génétique de caractères quantitatifs chez l'Eucaltyptus: des marqueurs anaonymes aux gènes candidats. PhD Thesis, Université de Montpellier.
26. Hartl DL, Clark AG. 1997. Principles of population genetics, 3rd edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
27. Henson M, Smith H. 2004. Borrowed technologies: adaptation of family forestry for Eucalypts in NSW, Australia. In: Borralho NMG, Pereira JS, Marques C, Coutinho J, Madeira M, Tome M, eds. Eucalyptus in a changing world. Proceedings of the IUFRO Conference, Aveiro, 11-15 October 2004, RAIZ, Instituto Investigacao da Floresta e Papel, Portugal.
28. Kawano S, Hara T. 1995. Optimal balance between propagule output, propagule size, and cost of propagule production in plants with special reference to its evolutionary - ecological implications. Plant Species Biology 10: 119-125.
29. Kendall MG, Stuart A. 1963. The advanced theory of statistics. New York, NY: Harner Publishing Co.
30. Knapp SJ, Bridges WC Jr, Yang M-H. 1989. Non parametric confidence interval estimators for heritability and expected selection response. Genetics 121: 891-898.
31. Kusnandar D, Galwey NW, Hertzler GL, Butcher TB. 1998. Age trends in variances and heritabilities for diameter and height in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) in Western Australia. Silvae Genetica 47: 136-141.
32. Larson PR. 1963. Stem form development of forest trees. Forest Science Monograph 5: 1-31.
33. McRae T, Pilbeam D, Powell M, Dutkowski G, Joyce K, Tier B. 2004. Genetic evaluation in Eucalypt breeding programs. In: Borralho NMG, Pereira JS, Marques C, Coutinho J, Madeira M, Tome M, eds. Eucalyptus in a changing world. Proceedings of the IUFRO Conference, Aveiro, 11-15 October 2004, RAIZ, Instituto Investigacao da Floresta e Papel, Portugal.
34. Martinez AJ, Lopez-Portillo J. 2003. Allometry of Prosopis glandulosa var. torreyana along a topographic gradient in the Chihuahuan desert. Journal of Vegetation Science 14: 111-120.
35. Murren CJ. 2002. Phenotypic integration in plants. Plant Species Biology 17: 89-99.
36. Murren CJ, Kover PK. 2004. QTL mapping, a first step toward an understanding of molecular genetic mechanisms behind phenotypic complexity/integration In: Pigliucci M, Preston K, eds. Phenotypic integration. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 195-211.
37. Namkoong G, Conkle MT. 1976. Time trends in genetic control of height growth in ponderosa pine. Forest Science 22: 2-12.
38. Papoulis A. 1990. Probability and statistics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
39. Parde J, Bouchon J. 1988. Dendrométrie, 2nd edn. Nancy: ENGREF.
40. Parson PA. 1987. Evolutionary rates under environmental stress. Evolution Theory 21: 311-347.
41. Patinot-Valera F, Kageyama PY. 1995. Parametros geneticos y espaciamieto en progenie de Eucalyptus saligna Smith. Research Paper IPEF, Piracicaba 48/49: 61-76.
42. Pierik R, Voesenek LACJ, de Kroon H, Visser EJW. 2004. Density-induced plant size reduction and size inequalities in ethylene-sensing and ethylene-insensitive tobacco. Plant Biology 6: 201-205.
43. Pigliucci M. 1997. Ontogenetic phenotypic plasticity during the reproductive phase in Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 84: 887-895.
44. Pigliucci M, Schlichting CD. 1995. Ontogenic reaction norms in Lobelia siphilitica (Lobeliaceae): response to shading. Ecology 76: 2134-2144.
45. Pigliucci M, DiIorio P, Schlichting CD. 1997. Phenotypic plasticity of growth trajectories in two species of Lobelia in response to nutrient availability. Journal of Ecology 85: 265-276.
46. Pigliucci M, Pollard H, Cruzan M. 2003. Comparative studies of evolutionary responses to light environments in Arabidopsis. American Naturalist 161: 68-82.
47. Preston KA, Ackerly DD. 2003. Hydraulic architecture and the evolution of shoot allometry in contrasting climates. American Journal of Botany 90: 1502-1512.
48. Roff D. 1997. Evolutionary quantitative genetics. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.
49. Roff D. 2002. Comparing G matrices: a MANOVA approach. Evolution 56: 1286-1291.
50. Sales J, Hill WG. 1976. Effect of sampling errors on efficiency of selection indices. 1. Use of information from relatives for single trait improvement. Animal Production 22: 1-17.
51. Saint-André L, M'Bou TA, Mabiala A, Mouvondy W, Jourdan C, Roupsard O, et al. 2005. Age-related equations for above- and below-ground biomass of a Eucalyptus hybrid in Congo. Forest Ecology and Management 205: 199-214.
52. SAS Institute 1988. SAS/STAT user's guide, release 6.03 edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
53. Schlichting CD, Pigliucci M. 1998. Phenotypic evolution: a reaction norm perspective. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
54. Snedecor W, Cochran GC. 1989. Statistical methods, 8th edn. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
55. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometry - the principles and practices of statistics in biological research. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman and Co.
56. 2 and nitrogen on two different forest soils. Basic and Applied Ecology 4: 467-478.
57. Takahashi K. 1996. Plastic response of crown architecture to crowding in understorey trees of two co-dominating conifers. Annals of Botany 77: 159-164.
58. Verhaegen D, Plomion C, Gion J-M, Poitel M, Costa P, Kremer A. 1997. Quantitative trait dissection analysis in Eucalyptus using RAPD markers. 1. Detection of QTL in interspecific hybrid progeny, stability of QTL expression across different ages. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 95: 597-608.
59. Via S, Lande R. 1995. Genotype-environment interaction and the evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 39: 505-522.
60. Vigneron P, Bouvet JM. 2000. Eucalyptus. In: Charrier A, Jacquot M, Nicolas, D, eds. Collection repère du cirad. Update. Tropical plant breeding. Enfields, NH: Science Publisher.
61. Wei X, Borralho NMG. 1998. Genetic control of growth traits of Eucalyptus urophylla S.T. Blake in South East China. Silvae Genetica 47: 158-164.
62. Weiner J, Thomas SC. 1992. Competition and allometry in three species of annual plants. Ecology 73: 648-656.
63. Wright SD, McConnaughay KDM. 2002. Interpreting phenotypic plasticity: the importance of ontogeny. Plant Species Biology 17: 119-131.
64. Wu RL. 1997. Genetic control of macro- and micro-environmental sensitivities in Populus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 94: 104-114.
65. Wu R, Stettler RF. 1998. Quantitative genetics of growth and development in Populus. III. Phenotypic plasticity of crown structure and function. Heredity 81: 299-310.
66. Wu RL, Ma CX, Lou YX, Casella G. 2003. Molecular dissection of allometry, ontogeny, and plasticity: a genomic view of developmental biology. Bioscience 53: 1041-1047.
67. Zobel B, Talbert J. 1984. Applied forest tree improvement. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.