Anchors and democratic change

Comparative Political Studies

Volumn 38, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 743-770

  Morlino, Leonardo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Anchoring; Change; Consolidation; Crisis; Legitimacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 24944508751     PISSN: 00104140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0010414004274401     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (2002). Incorporating the irrelevant: Anchors in judgments of belief and value. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 120-138). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Collier, B. R., & Collier, D. (1991). Shaping the political arena: Critical junctures, labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3. Dawisha, K., & Parrott, B. (Eds.). (1997). The consolidation of democracy in East-Central Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Diamond, L. (1999). Developing democracy toward consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
5. Di Maggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational life. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 377-391.
6. Dogan, M. (Ed.). (1988). Comparing pluralist democracies: Strains on legitimacy. Boulder, CO: Westview.
7. Eulau, H., & Prewitt, K. (1973). Labyrinths of democracy. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
8. European Commission. (1976-1990). Eurobarometer: Public opinion in the European Union. Brussels, Belgium: Directorate General Press, European Commission.
9. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
10. Fox, C. R., & Tversky, A. (1995). Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 585-603.
11. Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. (Eds.). (2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Gunther, R., & Montero, J. R. (2001). The anchors of partisanship: A comparative analysis of voting behavior in four Southern European democracies. In N. P. Diamandouros & R. Gunther (Eds.), Parties, politics, and democracy in the new Southern Europe (pp. 83-152). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
13. Gunther, R., Diamandouros, N. P., & Puhle, H. J. (Eds.). (1995). The politics of democratic consolidation: Southern Europe in comparative perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14. Higley, J., & Gunther, R. (Eds.). (1992). Elites and democratic consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Huntington, S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (2000). Choices, values and frames. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18. Katz, R. S. (1990). Party as linkage: A vestigial function? European Journal of Political Research, 24(1), 143-161.
19. Klingemann, H. D., & Fuchs, D. (1995). Citizens and the state. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
20. Lau, R. R., & Sears, D. O. (Eds.). (1986). Political cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Lawson, K. (Ed.). (1980). Political party and linkage: A comparative perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22. Lawson, K. (1988). When linkage fails. In K. Lawson & P. Merkl (Eds.), When parties fail: Emerging alternative organizations (pp. 13-40). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23. Linz, J. J. (1978). Crisis, breakdown, and reequilibration. In J. J. Linz & A. Stepan (Eds.), The breakdown of democratic regimes (pp. 3-124). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
24. Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
25. Luttbeg, N. R. (Ed.). (1974). Public opinion and public policy: Models of political linkage. Ithaca, NY: F. E. Peacock.
26. Mair, P. (1997). Electoral markets and stable states. In P. Mair, Party system change: Approaches and interpretations (pp. 157-174). Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
27. March, J., & Olsen, J. (1979). Ambiguity and choices in organizations. Oslo, Norway: Universitetforlaget.
28. March, J., & Olsen, J. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York/London: Free Press/Macmillan.
29. Morlino, L. (1991). Introduzione [Introduction]. In L. Morlino (Ed.), Costruire la democrazia: Gruppi e partiti in Italia (pp. 9-39). Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino.
30. Morlino, L. (1998). Democracy between consolidation and crisis: Parties, groups, and citizens in Southern Europe. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31. Morlino, L., & Montero, J. R. (1995). Legitimacy and democracy in Southern Europe. In R. Gunther, N. Diamandouros, & H. J. Puhle (Eds.), The politics of democratic consolidation in Southern Europe (pp. 231-260). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
32. Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
33. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251-267.
34. Pierson, P., & O'Neil Trowbridge, S. (2002, August). Asset specificity and institutional development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Political Science Association, Boston.
35. Pridham, G. (2000). The dynamics of democratization: A comparative approach. New York: Continuum.
36. Rokkan, S. (1970). Citizens, elections, parties. Oslo, Norway: Universitetforlaget.
37. Rosenau, J. (Ed.). (1969). Linkage politics. London: Collier/Macmillan.
38. Roth, G. (1963). The Social Democrats in imperial Germany. Totowa, NJ: Bedminster Press.
39. Sainsbury, D. (Ed.). (1990). Party strategies and party-voter linkages [Special issue]. European Journal of Political Research, 24(1).
40. Schedler, A. (2001). Measuring democratic consolidation. Studies in Comparative International Development, 36(1), 66-92.
41. Sniderman, P. (2000). Taking sides: A fixed choice theory of political reasoning. In A. Lupia, M. McCubbins, & S. Popkin (Eds.), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice and the bounds of rationality (pp. 67-84). New York: Cambridge University Press.
42. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
43. Zielonka, J. (Ed.). (2001). Democratic consolidation in Eastern Europe. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.