Adaptive distributed data management with weak consistent replicated data

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing

Volumn Part F128723, Issue , 1996, Pages 178-185

  Lenz, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Coherency control; Consistency island; Distributed data management; Need To know principle; Weak consistency replication

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY;

ADAPTIVE STRUCTURE; APPLICATION-ORIENTED; CONSISTENCY ISLAND; DATA AVAILABILITY; DATA REPLICATION; DISTRIBUTED DATA MANAGEMENTS; NEED-TO-KNOW PRINCIPLE; WEAK CONSISTENCY;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 24944507965     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/331119.331171     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Alonso, G.; Abbadi, A.: Partitioned Objects in Distributed Databases. In: Distributed and Parrallel Databases, Vol. 3, 1995, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1995, pp. 5-35
2. Alonso, R.; Barbara, D.; Garcia-Molina, H.: Quasi-Copies: Efficient Data Sharing for Information Retrieval Systems. In: Schmidt, J.W.; Ceri, S.; Missikoff, M. (Eds.): Advances in Database Technology-EDBT '88, Venice, March, 1988. Proceedings, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988, pp. 443-468
3. Adiba, M.; Lindsay, B.: Database Snapshots. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Montreal, Canada, 1980, pp. 86-91
4. Barbara, D.; Garcia-Molina, H.: The Case for Controlled Inconsistency in Replicated Data. In: Proceedings of the first Workshop on the Management of Replicated Data, Nov 8-9, 1990, pp. 35-38
5. Bernstein, P.A.; Hadzilacos, V; Goodman, N.: Concurrency Control and Recovery in Database Systems. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1987
6. Ceri, S. et. al.: A Classification of Update Methods for Replicated Databases, Research Report STAN-CS-91-1932, Stanford University, October 1991
7. Ceri, S.; Houtsma, M. A. W.; Keller, A. M.; Samarati, P.: Independent Updates and Incremental Agreement in Replicated Databases. In: Distributed and Parallel Databases 3 (1995), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1995, S. 225-246
8. Chen, S.; Pu, G: An Analysis of Replica Control. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on the Management of Replicated Data, Monterey, California, November 1992, pp. 22-25
9. Gallersdörfer, R.; Nicola, M.: Improving Performance in Replicated Databases through Relaxed Coherency. In: Proceedings of the 21" International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Zürich, Schweiz, September, 1995
10. [lOjGolding R. A.: Weak-consistency group communication and membership. PhD thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz, December 1992.
11. Goldring R.: Things every update replication customer should know. In: Proceedings of the 1995 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, San Jose, May 22-25, 1995, 439-440
12. Gray, J.; Reuter, A.: Transaction Processing-Concepts and Techniques, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1993
13. Jablonski, S.: Datenverwaltung in verteilten Systemen, Informatik-Fachbericht 233, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1990
14. Lenz, R.: Distributed Data Management with Weak Consistent Replicated Data-A System Architecture Proposal. In: Thomas Ruf (Hrsg.): Redundancy-Based Query Optimization in Database Systems. Bericht 95/2 des Sonderforschungsbereichs 182, Teilprojekt B4, zugleich Arbeitsbericht des IMMD, Band 28, Nr. 6, August 1995
15. Lenz, R.; Kirsche. T.; Reinwald B.: ASPECT-Specifying Consistency Requirements for Replicated Data. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing Systems, Las Vegas, October 1994
16. Ladin, R.; Liskov, B.; Shrira, L.: Lazy Replication: exploiting the semantics of distributed services. Position Paper for 4th ACM-SIGOPS European Workshop, Bologna. Published as Operating Systems Review, 25(1), January 1991, pp. 49-55
17. 0'Neil, P.E.: The Escrow Transactional Method. In: ACM Transactions on Database Systems 11 (4), 1986, pp. 405-430
18. [18JÖZSU, M.; Valduriez, P.: Principles of Distributed Databse Systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (NJ), 1991
19. Pu, G; Hseush, W.; Kaiser, G.; Wu, K.; Yu, P.: Divergence Control for Distributed Database Systems. In: Distributed and Parrallel Databases, Vol. 3, 1995, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1995, pp. 85-109
20. Pu, G, Leff, A.: Epsilon-Serializability. Technical Report No. CUCS-054-90, Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, New York, January 1991
21. Pu, G, Leff, A.: Replica control in distributed systems: An asynchronous approach. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD, 1991, pp. 377387
22. Ramamritham, K., Chrysanthis, P.: In Search of Acceptability Criteria: Database Consistency Requirements and Transaction Correctness Properties. In Distributed Object Management, Ed.: Ozsu, Dayal and Val-duirez. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1992
23. Sheth, A.; Rusinciewicz, M: Management of interdependent data: Specifying dependency and consistency requirements. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Management of Replicated Data, pp. 133-136, Houston, Texas, November 1990
24. Sheth, A.; Leu, Y.; Elmagarmid, A.: Maintaining consistency of interdependent data in Multidatabase Systems. Technical Report CSD-TR-91-016, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, March 1991
25. Wedekind, H.: Ubiquity and Need-to-Know: Two Principles of Data Distribution. In Operating Systems Review, Vol. 22, No. 4, October 1988
26. Wiederhold, G.; Qian, X.: Modeling asynchrony in distributed data-bases. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Data Engineering, pp. 246-250, February 1987
27. Wiederhold, G.; Qian, X.; Consistency control of replicated data in federated databases. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Management of Replicated Data, pp. 130-132, Houston, Texas, November 1990