Graphical user interfaces in an engineering educational environment

Computer Applications in Engineering Education

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 48-59

  Depcik, Christopher ^a   Assanis, Dennis N ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b Automotive Research Center   (Norway)

Author keywords

Classroom; Graphical user interfaces; Programming; benchmark; Visual post processing

Indexed keywords

CONFIGURATION FLEXIBILITY; INPUT PARAMETERS;

BENCHMARKING; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DATA REDUCTION; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; STUDENTS;

GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES;

EID: 24944503595     PISSN: 10613773     EISSN: 10990542     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cae.20029     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Air Force Flight Test Center History Office, Murphy's law was invented here, www.edwards.af.mil/history/docs_html/tidbits/Murphy's_law.html, 2004.
2. C. Depcik, Open-ended thermodynamic cycle simulation, M.S. thesis, Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 2000.
3. D. A. Wheeler, Ada, C, C++, and Java vs. the Steelman, www.adahome.com/History/Steelman/steeltab.htm, 1996.
4. J. R. Gary, S. G. Shasharina, J. C. Cummings, J. V. W. Reynders, and P. J. Hinker, Comparison of C++ and Fortran 90 for object-oriented scientific programming, Comput Phys Commun 105 (1997), 20-36.
5. B. Mösli, A comparison of C++, Fortran 90 and Oberon-2 for scientific programming, Proceedings of GISI 95, pp 740-748, Zürich, September 18-20, 1995.
6. J. Surveyor, Java and Visual Basic: Programming's new breed, www.hubcanada.com/story_2269_22, 1999.
7. F. Balena, Programming Microsoft Visual Basic 6.0, Microsoft Press, Washington, 1999.
8. A. M. Al-Rawi, Comparison between high level languages for power engineering education, Proceedings of the 29th Universities Power Engineering Conference, pp 894-897, Galway, September 1994.
9. C. Hirsch, Numerical computation of internal and external flows, Vol. 1: Fundamentals of Numerical Discretization, Wiley, Chichester, 1988.
10. R. P. Weicker, A detailed look at some popular benchmarks, Parallel Comput 17 (1991), 1153-1172.
11. The MathWorks, Inc., Solution Number: 1-19XG3, http://www.mathworks.com/ support/solutions/data/l-19XG3.html, The MathWorks, Nantick, MA, 2004.
12. The MathWorks, Inc., Application program interface guide, The MathWorks, Nantick, MA, 2001.
13. Microsoft Corporation, Using the classes to write applications for windows, msdn.microsoft.com/Iibrary/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vccore98/ html/_core_using_the_classes_to_write_applications_for_windows.asp, 2004.
14. J. R. Jackson and A. L. McClellan, Java by example, Sun Microsystems Press, California, 1999.
15. S. I. Feldman, D. M. Gay, M. W. Maimone, and N. L. Schryer, A Fortran-to-C converter, AT&T Bell Laboratories, Computing Science Technical Report No. 149, 1995.
16. K. Ng, W. M. Presz, Jr., and M. Khosrowjerdi, Engineering analysis and simulation using Visual Basic, Proceedings of 1994 ASME International CIE Conference, pp 897-912, Minneapolis, September 11-14, 1994.
17. A. B. Savery, Creating Windows based engineering software applications using Microsoft Visual Basic, Comput Civil Eng l (1995), 99-106.
18. D. E. Torres and J. L. Anders, Using Microsoft Visual Basic to write engineering applications, Proceedings of the Petroleum Computer Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, pp 291-299, Houston, June 11-14, 1995.
19. W. L. Whipple, Walking through an application with Visual C++, Proceedings of the ELECTRO'96, IEEE, pp 359-364, Somerset, April 30-May 2, 1996.
20. Y. Tao, Design patterns for developing GUI applications, Proc Front Educ Conf 1 (1999), 11a3-11.
21. G. Antonio, R. Fiutem, E. Merlo, and P. Tonella, Application and user interface migration from Basic to Visual C++, Proceedings of the 1995 ISEE International Conference on Software Maintenance, IEEE, pp 76-85, Opio, October 17-20, 1995.
22. C. Petzold, Programming Windows, the definitive guide to the Win32 API, Microsoft Press, Redmond, WA, 1998.
23. D. J. Kruglinski, S. Wingo, and G. Shepherd, Programming Visual C++, Microsoft Press, Redmond, WA, 1998.
24. C. Depcik, Modeling reacting gases and after treatment devices for internal combustion engines, Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 2003.
25. D. Cole, R. Wainwright, and D. Schoenefeld, Using Java to develop web based tutorials, Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, ITiCSE, pp 92-96, Atlanta, February 26-March 1, 1998.
26. S. R. Davis, Programming Microsoft Visual J++ 6.0, Microsoft Press, Redmond, WA, 1999.
27. S. Manson, C. DeMarco, R. Lasseter, and F. Alvarado, MATLAB GUI power flow, Proceedings of the 31st Universities Power Engineering Conference, pp 646-649, Iraklio, September 18-20, 1996.
28. A. Azemi and E. E. Yaz, Using graphical user interface capabilities of MATLAB in advanced engineering courses, The 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), IEEE, pp 359-363, Phoenix, December 7-10, 1999.
29. The MathWorks, Inc., Creating graphical user interfaces, The MathWorks, Nantick, MA, 2002.
30. P. Marchand, Graphics and GUIs with MATLAB, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1999.