Performance evaluation of consistent recovery protocols using MPICH-GF

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Volumn 3463, Issue , 2005, Pages 167-178

  Woo, Namyoon ^a   Jung, Hyungsoo ^a   Shin, Dongin ^a   Han, Hyuck ^a   Yeom, Heon Y ^a   Park, Taesoon ^a,b  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Sejong University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; DATABASE SYSTEMS; EVALUATION; PARALLEL PROCESSING SYSTEMS; PERFORMANCE; SUPERVISORY AND EXECUTIVE PROGRAMS;

ABSTRACT DEVICES; DATASETS; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; RECOVERY PROTOCOLS;

COMPUTER SYSTEM RECOVERY;

EID: 24944503591     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/11408901_12     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. L. Alvisi, E. N. Elnozahy, S. Rao, S. A. Husain, and A. D. Mel: An Analysis of Communication Induced Checkpointing. FTCS-29, The 29th International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing, pp. 242-249
2. L. Alvisi, and K. Marzullo: Trade-Offs in Implementing Causal Message Logging Protocols. Proceedings of the 15th ACM Annual Symposium on the Principles of Distributed Computing, pp.58-67, May 1996.
3. A. Agbaria and R. Friedman: Starfish: Fault-tolerant dynamic MPI programs on clusters of workstations. Proc. IEEE Symp. on High Performance Distributed Computing, pp. 167-176, August 1999.
4. A. Bouteiller, P. Lemarinier, G. Krawezik, and F. Cappello: Coordinated check-point versus message log for fault-tolerant MPI. In proceedings of Cluster 2003, pp. 242-250, December 2003.
5. K.M. Chandy and L. Lamport: Distributed snapshots: Determining global states of distributed systems. ACM Trans. on Computing Systems, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 63-75, Aug. 1985.
6. E. N. Elnozahy, L. Alvisi, Y.-M. Wang, and D. B. Johnson: A survey of rollback-recovery protocols in message-passing systems. ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 375-408, 2002.
7. W. Gropp, E. Lusk, N. Doss, and A. Skjellum: A high-performance, portable implementation of the MPI Message Passing Interface Standard. Parallel Computing, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 789-828, 1996.
8. N. T. Karnois, B. Toonen, and I. Foster: MPICH-G2: A grid-enabled implementation of the message passing interface. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 551-563, May 2003.
9. NASA Ames Research Center: Nas parallel benchmarks. Technical report, http://science.nas.nasa.gov/Software/NPB/, 1997.
10. N. Neves and W. K. Fuchs: RENEW: A tool for fast and efficient implementation of checkpoint protocols. Symp. on Fault-Tolerant Computing, pp. 58-67, 1998.
11. A. Nguyen-Tuong: Integrating Fault-Tolerance Techniques in Grid Applications. PhD thesis, University of Virginia, USA, 2000.
12. G. T. Nguyen, V. D. Tran, and M. Kotocová: Application recovery in parallel programming environment. European PVM/MPI, pp. 234-242, 2002.
13. J. S. Plank, M. Beck, G. Kingsley, and K. Li: Libckpt: Transparent checkpointing under unix. USENIX Winter 1995 Technical Conference, Jan. 1995.
14. J. S. Plank, K. Li, and M. A. Puening: Diskless checkpointing. IEEE Trans. on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 972-986, 1998.
15. S. Rao, L. Alvisi, and H. M. Vin: The cost of recovery in message logging protocols. IEEE Transaction on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 160-173, Mar./Apr. 2000.
16. S. Rao, L. Alvisi, and H. M. Vin: Egida: An extensible toolkit for low-overhead fault-tolerance. Symp. on Fault-Tolerant Computing, pp. 48-55, 1999.
17. S. H. Russ, J. Robinson, B. K. Flachs, and B. Heckel: The Hector distributed run-time environment. IEEE Trans. on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1102-1114, Nov. 1998.
18. G. Stellner: CoCheck: Checkpointing and process migration for MPI. Proc. the Int'l Parallel Processing Symp., pp. 526-531, Apr. 1996.
19. V. Zandy: ckpt library, http://www.cs.wisc.edu/zandy/ckpt/.
20. W. Zwaenepoel and E. N. Elnozahy: Manetho: Transparent rollback-recovery with low overhead, limited rollback, and fast output commit. IEEE Transactions on Computers, Vol. C-41, No. 5, pp. 526-531, May 1992.