Cost-effective osteopathic manipulative medicine: A literature review of cost-effectiveness analyses for osteopathic manipulative treatment

Journal of the American Osteopathic Association

Volumn 105, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 357-367

  Gamber, Russell ^a   Holland, Shane ^d   Russo, David P ^e   Cruser, Des Anges ^c   Hilsenrath, Peter E ^b  

^a University of North Texas Health Science Center   (United States)

^b School of Nursing and Mailman

^c Osteopathic Research Center   (United States)

^d EAST TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Mayo Clinic   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MANAGED CARE; MANIPULATIVE MEDICINE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDLINE; REVIEW; WORKMAN COMPENSATION;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MANIPULATION, OSTEOPATHIC; WORKERS' COMPENSATION;

EID: 24944495382     PISSN: 00986151     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Hawaii workers compensation cost analysis study. Denver, Colo: Tillinghast-Towers Perrin; 1994.
2. An independent analysis of claims for the Colorado workers' compensation claims. Denver, Colo: Milliman and Robertson; 2001.
3. Independent analyses of claims for the Colorado workers' compensation claims. Denver: Tillinghast-Towers Perrin; 1996.
4. Li Z. Texas workers' compensation medical trend analysis, 1996-1997. Paper presented at: Texas Workers' Compensation Program Conference; 1999.
5. Lipton JA, Meneses P, Martin JB, Mizera AC, Kappler R, Brooks JS, et al. Improved pain score outcomes achieved through the cooperative and cost-effective use of physical (osteopathic manipulative) medicine in the treatment of outpatient musculoskeletal complaints. Amer Acad Osteopath J. Spring 2002;12:26-32. Available at: http://www.academyofosteopathy.org/ Spring2002.pdf. Accessed August 10, 2005.
6. Cantieri MS. Inpatient osteopathic manipulative treatment; impact on length of stay. Amer Acad Osteopath J. Winter 1997;7:25-29.
7. Hess JA, Mootz RD. Comparison of work and time estimates by chiropractic physicians with those of medical and osteopathic providers. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999;22:280-291.
8. Swords WJ. Low back pain: cost and treatment. Amer Acad Osteopath J. Winter 2000;10:22-30.
9. Andersson GB, Lucente T, Davis AM, Kappler RE, Lipton JA, Leurgans S. A comparison of osteopathic spinal manipulation with standard care for patients with low back pain [published correction appears in N Engl J Med. 2000;342:817]. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1426-1431. Abstract available at: http://content.nejm. org/cgi/content/abstract/341/19/1426. Accessed August 10, 2005.
10. Klock GB. The impact of osteopathic manipulative medicine on inpatient outcomes. Amer Acad Osteopath J. Spring 2002;12:33-38. Available at: http://www.academyofosteopathy.org/Spring2002.pdf. Accessed August 10, 2005.
11. Radjieski JM, Lumley MA, Cantieri MS. Effect of osteopathie manipulative treatment on length of stay for pancreatitis: a randomized pilot study [published correction appears in J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1998;98:408]. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1998;98:264-272.
12. Noll DR, Shores JH, Gamber RG, Herron KM, Swift J Jr. Benefits of osteopathic manipulative treatment for hospitalized elderly patients with pneumonia. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2000;100:776-782. Available at: http://www.jaoa.org/cgi/reprint/100/12/776. Accessed August 10, 2005.
13. Licciardone JC, Gamber RG, Russo DP. Quality of life in referred patients presenting to a specialty clinic for osteopathic manipulative treatment. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2002;102:151-155. Available at: http://www.jaoa. org/cgi/reprint/102/31151. Accessed August 10, 2005.
14. Licciardone J, Gamber R, Cardarelli K. Patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes associated with osteopathic manipulative treatment. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2002;102:13-20. Available at: http://www.jaoa.org/cgi/reprint/102/1/13. Accessed August 10, 2005.
15. Gamber RG, Shores JH, Russo DP, Jimenez C, Rubin BR. Osteopathic manipulative treatment in conjunction with medication relieves pain associated with fibromyalgia syndrome: results of a randomized clinical pilot project. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2002;102:321-325. Available at: http://www.jaoa.org/cgi/ reprint/102/6/321. Accessed August 10, 2005.
16. Knebl JA, Shores JH, Gamber RG, Gray WT, Herron KM. Improving functional ability in the elderly via the Spencer technique, an osteopathic manipulative treatment: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2002; 102:387-396. Available at: http://www.jaoa.org/cgi/reprint/102/7/387. Accessed August 10, 2005.
17. Weinstein MC, Siegel JE, Gold MR, Kamlet MS, Russell LB. Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine [review]. JAMA. 1996;276:1253-1258.
18. Hsiao W, Braun P, Kelly NL, Becker ER. Results, potential effects, and implementation issues of the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale. JAMA. 1988;260:2429-2438.
19. Assendelft WJ, Bouter LM. Does the goose really lay golden eggs? A methodological review of Workmen's Compensation studies [review]. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993;16:161-168.
20. Wolk S. An analysis of Florida workers' compensation medical claims for back-related injuries. ACA J Chiropr. 1988;27:50-59.
21. Johnson MR, Schultz MK, Ferguson AC. A comparison of chiropractic, medical and osteopathic care for work-related sprains and strains. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1989;12:335-344.
22. Stano M. A comparison of health care costs for chiropractic and medical patients. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993;16:291-299.
23. Maniadakis N, Gray A. The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain. 2000;84:95-103.
24. American Medical Association. ICD-9-CM 2002: International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification. Vols 1 and 2. 9th rev. 4th ed. Chicago, III: American Medical Association; 2001.
25. Hsiao WC, Braun P, Dunn DL, Becker ER, Yntema D, Verrilli DK, et al. An overview of the development and refinement of the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale: the foundation for reform of U.S. physician payment [review]. Med Care. 1992;30(11 Suppl):NS1-12.
26. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I: Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-483.
27. Ware JE Jr, Snyder MK, Wright WR, Davies AR. Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care. Eval Program Plann 1983;6:247-263.
28. Katz LK, Rosen HS, eds. Microeconomics. 3rd ed. Boston, Mass: Irwin McGraw-Hill; 1998.